Skip to content

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Functional Electrical Stimulation for Upper-limb Rehabilitation After Stroke

Association Between the Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) for Upper-limb Rehabilitation After Stroke - A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02818608
Enrollment
51
Registered
2016-06-30
Start date
2017-08-14
Completion date
2019-01-15
Last updated
2019-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Cerebrovascular Accident, Cerebrovascular Stroke, Cerebral Stroke

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to verify the effectiveness of tDCS combined with FES on upper limb rehabilitation of post-stroke subjects with moderate and severe compromise.

Interventions

Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) + Sham Transcranial direct brain stimulation (tDCS)

DEVICECombination of Transcranial direct brain stimulation (tDCS) and FES

Real Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) + Real Transcranial direct brain stimulation (tDCS)

Sponsors

Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke diagnosis and moderate or severe hemiparesis (chronic stroke - at least 6 months of disease) * Ability to reach 60 degrees in the shoulder flexion * Minimal cognitive ability to understand commands * No current use of antiepileptic drugs for seizures

Exclusion criteria

* Painful shoulder, adhesive capsulitis or glenohumeral subluxation * Contraindication for electrical stimulation (presence of metallic implants) or risks for the tDCS, as evaluated by means of a standard questionnaire

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Upper-limb reaching analysis evaluated by means of the 3-D motion analysis system (BTS SMART DX 400)Change from Pre to Post 1 (after the 10th session) and Post 3 (3 months follow-up)3-D motion analysis system

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Grip force assessed by means of dynamometerChange from Pre to Post 1 (after the 10th session) and Post 3 (3 months follow-up)Evaluated by means of dynamometer (Jamar)
Manual dexterity assessed by means of the block and box testChange from Pre to Post 1 (after the 10th session) and Post 3 (3 months follow-up)Block and box test
Quality of life assessed by means of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SSQOL)Change from Pre to Post 1 (after the 10th session) and Post 3 (3 months follow-up)Questionnaire
Muscular tone assessed by the Modified Ashworth ScaleChange from Pre to Post 1 (after the 10th session) and Post 3 (3 months follow-up)Modified Ashworth Scale
Assessment of Sensorimotor Recovery After Stroke by the Fugl-Meyer scaleChange from Pre to Post 1 (after the 10th session) and Post 3 (3 months follow-up)Fugl-Meyer scale

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026