Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Conditions
Keywords
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, Tripterygium, Administration, Topical
Brief summary
Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (TwHF), a traditional Chinese herb, is widely used in China for treating Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), but limited only for elderly RA patients because of its reproductive system toxicity. The investigators are inspired by Chinese external therapy, an immemorial therapy for thousands of years, and take its advantage to make TwHF topically in order to get an effective and safe treatment for active RA patients.
Interventions
DRUGTopical tripterygium gel
DRUGPlacebo gel
Sponsors
Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Documented diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, as defined by the American Rheumatism Association 1987 Revised Criteria. * Documented diagnosis of damp-heat syndrome according to Traditional Chinese Medicine. * Patients, men and women, must age from 18 to 65 years old. * Patients must have moderately active RA based on the criteria of the DAS-28 score from 3.2 to 5.1. * If patients are receiving Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), then the doses should have been kept stable for at least 12 weeks. * If patients are receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or orally Chinese herbal medicine, then the doses should have been kept stable for at least 4 weeks.
Exclusion criteria
* Skin allergies or broken skin; * Taking TwHF agents, glucocorticoids and biological agents; * Female patients who are pregnant, breast-feeding or planed to be pregnant; * Subjects suffering serious hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, gastrointestinal problems or liver and renal failure.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Twenty percent improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria | Week 8. | a patient must have 20% or greater improvement in both tender and swollen joints (28 tender and 28 swollen joints were assessed) and 20% or greater improvement in 3 or more of the following: the physician's or patient's assessment of global health status, the patient's assessment of pain on a visual analogue scale, the patient's assessment of function using a modified version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Fifty percent improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria | Week 4 and week 8. | a patient must have 50% or greater improvement in both tender and swollen joints (28 tender and 28 swollen joints were assessed) and 50% or greater improvement in 3 or more of the following: the physician's or patient's assessment of global health status, the patient's assessment of pain on a visual analogue scale, the patient's assessment of function using a modified version of the HAQ), and the ESR or CRP level. |
| The changes of the 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | Week 4 and week 8. | — |
| The change of knee synovitis classification as assessed by musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) | Week 2, 4, and 8. | Synovitis classification is specific as follows: 0 level, no doppler signal; level 1: three independent point or 2 successive or 1 and 2 in independent dot doppler signal; level 2: doppler signal \< 50% of the synovial membrane area; level 3 doppler signal is the synovium in \> 50% of the area. |
| The changes of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score | Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. | — |
| The change of knee articular cavity effusion as assessed by MSUS | Week 2, 4, and 8. | Articular cavity effusion adopts binary evaluation, namely: 0: normal, 1: abnormal. |
| The change of knee bone erosion classification as assessed by MSUS | Week 2, 4, and 8. | Bone erosion classification adopts binary evaluation, namely: 0: normal, 1: abnormal. |
| The change of knee synovial hyperplasia classification as assessed by MSUS | Week 2, 4, and 8. | Synovial hyperplasia classification is specific as follows: 0 level, no synovial hyperplasia; level 1: synovial hyperplasia of mild, not more than bone surface high attachment; level 2: synovial hyperplasia more than bone surface high wire, but not more than the backbone; level 3: synovial hyperplasia more than bone surface peak wires, and extends along the backbone of the side. |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed