Skip to content

Comparison of the Analgesic Effect Between the Motor Cortex Stimulation and the Trans-spinal Stimulation in the Algoneurodystrophy.

Comparison of the Analgesic Effect Between the Motor Cortex Stimulation (tDCS and rTMS) and the Trans-spinal Stimulation (tsDCS ) in the Algoneurodystrophy of Members. A Randomised Clinical Trial. tDCS : Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation rTMS : Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation tsDCS : Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02817880
Acronym
ALGOSTIM
Enrollment
36
Registered
2016-06-29
Start date
2016-07-25
Completion date
2022-02-22
Last updated
2025-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Algoneurodystrophy

Keywords

rTMS, tDCS, tsDCS, pain, algoneurodystrophy , neurostimulation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic effectiveness of two motor cortex neurostimulations (tDCS and rTMS) and the trans-spinal neurostimulation (tsDCS ) in the algoneurodystrophy.

Detailed description

* Entry into the study : After informed consent, patients will be randomised into three groups : tDCS, rTMS, tsDCS. The physician responsible for conducting neurostimulation sessions will make the randomization via an interactive web response system (IWRS). * Baseline : Participants, will record on a book, a daily Visual Numeric Scale(VNS) of Pain Intensity for 1 month. * The beginning of the treatment : after the baseline, sessions of neurostimulation will begin. Sessions of neurostimulation will have a decreasing rhythm. Five sessions per week during the two first weeks, two sessions per week during the third week, one session during the fourth week and then two sessions per month for four months. * After the end of neurostimulation sessions, patients will be followed for 1month. Throughout their participation in the study, patients will complete their VNS report book (1month of baseline before the treatment, 3 months during neurostimulation, 1 month after neurostimulation). Patients will have 5 evaluation examinations: * The first, one just before the beginning of the neurostimulation, * The second, 1 month after the beginning of neurostimulation * The third, 3 months after the beginning of neurostimulation * And the last one, 1 month after the end of neurostimulation.

Interventions

DEVICErTMS
DEVICEtDCS
DEVICEtsDCS

Sponsors

University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient's written consent * Patient suffering from an algoneurodystrophy for more than a year. * Diagnosis of algoneurodystrophy confirmed by an osseous scintigraphy * Stable treatment for at least 1 month * Patient non-responsive to pharmacological treatments * VNS \> 3 at the time of screening

Exclusion criteria

* Drug addiction * History of epilepsy, head trauma, Psychiatric pathology likely to hamper the progress of the study. * Intracranial ferromagnetic material or an implanted stimulator * MRI contraindication * Algoneurodystrophy due to a nervous lesion * Pregnant women, parturient women, breast-feeding mother. Lack of effective contraception

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Visual numeric scale of pain between the three groupsBaseline to 1 month

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The SF12 quality of life questionnaire between the three groupsBaseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD) between the three groupsBaseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
The Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) between the three groupsBaseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
Evolution of the conductance of feet and hands by using SudoscanBaseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)The body conductance will be used to assess the evolution of the Impact of the neurostimulation on the sympathetic nervous system and on the small fiber neuropathy.
Modifications of the sensori-motor cortical cards by using a MRIBaseline, and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)
The Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory scale (NPSI) between the three groupsBaseline, 3 months after the beginning of the treatment (day 90), and 1 month after the end of the treatment (Day 180)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026