Skip to content

Laparoscopic Surgery and Abdominal Compliance

Laparoscopic Surgery and Abdominal Compliance Factors Including Neuromuscular Blocking Agents

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02816567
Acronym
COELIOCUR
Enrollment
180
Registered
2016-06-28
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients Ongoing Elective Abdominal Laparoscopy

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to describe factors influencing abdominal compliance during laparoscopic surgery, including neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA). The use of NMBA is randomized and blinded from the surgeons and the anesthesiologist. The abdominal compliance is measured by pressure/volume relationship.

Detailed description

Background and rationale. Abdominal laparoscopic surgery is widely used. The meet good conditions, the surgeons need a large enough workspace. Carbonic gaz is insufflated in the intraperitoneal space but limited by the induced pressure which usually must not be above 15mm mercury (Hg) because of subsequent organ failures. The relationship between pressure and gaz volume insufflated defines the abdominal compliance (ΔV/ΔP). The use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) is often used during abdominal laparoscopic surgery in order to reduce abdominal tonus, create a sufficient laparoscopic workspace hence improving abdominal compliance. However, considering good working conditions could be achieved by the use of NMBA, other factors could be considered like body weight, length, BMI, surgical abdominal history, parity. Main objective : To compare the working surgical conditions and the pneumoperitoinea volume obtained during abdominal laparoscopic surgery with and without initial NMBA use. Hypothesis: The use of NMBA improve the incidence of good surgical working conditions. Study Design : Randomized blinded clinical trial. Two patients groups are compared, one receiving NMBA and one receiving a placebo. Randomisation will be realised by 1/1 ratio in blocks of 4. The primary outcome is a composite criteria : the obtention of laparoscopic workspace greater than 3 liters associated with an abdominal pressure lesser than 15mmHg and a good surgical rating scale. A statistical analysis reveal that 90 patients in each group need to be included from estimated 90% satisfying surgical conditions in NMBA group and 70% in placebo group. In the placebo group, when surgical conditions are not correct (insufflated volume lesser than 3 liters or surgeon dissatisfaction), NMBA are used. This define the secondary use of NMBA. Methods : Anesthesia will be induced in all patients by target controlled infusions of propofol and sufentanil respectively with initial targets of 6 microgram/ml and 0,4 ng/ml. The initial NMBA bolus in the NMBA group is 0,15 mg/kg of cisatracurium. A similar volume of isotonic saline serum is used in the placebo group. The abdomen is inflated to 5, 10 and 15 mmHg and volumes at each pressure level are measured in order to evaluate the abdominal compliance. After those measures, the anesthesiologist is unblinded of NMBA use. If the workspace volume is lesser than 3 liters, or, in case of surgeon dissatisfaction (using the surgical rating scale), NMBA can be used, defining secondary NMBA used. Anesthesia is maintained by continous infusions of propofol and sufentanil aiming BIS target of 40 to 60. When used, curarisation is maintained by a continuous infusion of cisatracurium (0,06 to 0,12 mg/kg/h) targetting 0 or 1 TOF response. Safety issues : During anesthesia induction, if ventilation or tracheal intubation difficulties were to happen, the anesthesiologist is unblinded and any anesthesia protocol can be used.

Interventions

DRUGpropofol
DRUGNMBA - cisatracurium
DRUGplacebo - isotonic saline serum
DRUGsufentanil
PROCEDURElaparoscopic surgery

Sponsors

CHU de Reims
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* elective abdominal laparoscopy (cholecystectomy, colectomy, gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, hepatic resection, splenectomy, hernial surgery, explorative laparoscopy) * \>18 yo * patients who accept the protocol and sign it * patients affiliated at the social security

Exclusion criteria

* formal indication of NMBA use (predictive difficult tracheal intubation, predictive difficult facial ventilation) * patients who needs a crush induction * NMBA allergia * patients who present a contraindication to the propofol or sufentanil * pregnancy * breastfeeding womens * patients protected by the law

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Volume of pneumoperiteum laparoscopic workspaceDay 0 (after anesthesia induction)laparoscopic workspace assessed by volume of pneumoperiteum \> 3 Liters
score SRS (Surgical Rating Scale)Day 0 (after anesthesia induction)

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactBeny Charbit
bcharbit@chu-reims.fr326787029

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026