Skip to content

Labial Alveolar Bone Thickness and Apical Root Resorption Changes Associated With Self-ligating Versus Conventional Brackets

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Labial Alveolar Bone Thickness and Apical Root Resorption Between Two Kinds of Brackets Using CBCT

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02816489
Enrollment
21
Registered
2016-06-28
Start date
2016-05-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Apical Root Resorption, Labial Alveolar Bone Thickness

Brief summary

Labial alveolar bone thickness and apical root resorption changes associated with self-ligating versus conventional brackets. The aim of this study will be to compare labial alveolar bone thickness and apical root resorption changes associated with self-ligating versus conventional brackets.

Detailed description

Labial alveolar bone thickness and apical root resorption changes associated with self-ligating versus conventional brackets. Protocol submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirements of Master Degree in Orthodontics. The initial stage of treatment crowding permanent teeth orthodontically is worried about teeth leveling and alignment. The accuracy of this procedure depends on various variables. Friction is generated upon the materialistic composition of different bracket and archwire types, and the technique of ligature between them. Several self-ligating brackets have been grown since 1935. Self-ligation doesn't need for an elastomeric attachment to catch the archwire, so it is related with a highly reduced friction with many different types of archwires, therefore less force required. It is valuable to evaluate any appliance system for its capability to align teeth with minimal injurious effects to the oral tissues. The aim of this study will be to compare labial alveolar bone thickness and apical root resorption changes associated with self-ligating versus conventional brackets. Subjects and method Study design: Randomized controlled clinical trial Study setting and population: The sample of this study will be consisted of twenty one patients selected from Outpatient Clinic, Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University. Interventions: The patients will be divided randomly into two groups and will be treated separately as follows: * Group I: will be treated using passive self-ligating ceramic orthodontic brackets with stainless steel archwire slot liner. * Group II: will be treated using conventional stainless steel orthodontic brackets ligated with elastomeric ligature. The patients will be treated orthodontically within the initial leveling and alignment for the 6 month duration beginning with the same sequence of 0.014, 0.016, 0.016 × 0.022 inch nickel-titanium archwires and 0.016 × 0.022 inch stainless-steel archwire. Each archwire will be remained for 1.5 months, and it will be replaced with the previously mentioned sequence. For group II, the archwires will be attached to the brackets by using an elastomeric ligature. CBCT will be obtained in two time intervals, before beginning the orthodontic treatment and 6 months after it. Dental stripping and extraction of premolars will be eliminated. Records: For all patients the following records will be taken before and after leveling and alignment: 1. Standardized upper and lower study casts. 2. Standardized periapical radiograph. 3. Standardized extra-oral and intra-oral photographs. 4. Standardized cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Observations: Sagittal cuts of upper and lower incisors in the center of the long axis will be selected. The labial alveolar bone thickness (LABT) of each incisor will be determined at the site neighboring to the widest point of the labiopalatal root in two levels separated by 3 mm (L1 and L2, respectively); these levels will be set along the long axis of the incisor and located every 3 mm from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) level. Labial alveolar bone thickness will be assessed at the cervical level (L1) and midroot level (L2) at T0 and T1. Furthermore, the apical root resorption (ARR) will be calculated by determining the difference in the total tooth length, which will be measured in millimeters from the incisal border to the root apex, between T0 and T1 (T1-T0). Ethical consideration: All patients will receive information about the future clinical trial study and give their consent by signing an informed consent. Data management and analysis: All statistical analysis will be performed with SPSS software. Differences will be considered significant at P values less than 0.05.

Interventions

DEVICEClarity SL MBT brackets; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA

(passive self-ligating ceramic orthodontic brackets with stainless steel archwire slot liner)

DEVICEGemini MBT brackets; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA

(conventional stainless steel orthodontic brackets ligated with elastomeric ligature)

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ranged between 14-20 years. 2. Complete permanent dentition (excluding third molars). 3. Angle Class I malocclusion. 4. Crowding anteriorly ranging from 2 to 4 mm. 5. Healthy young patients.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with signs of apical root resorption detected at the first examination by periapical radiographs. 2. Blocked-out or High-up canines. 3. Patients who went to previous orthodontic treatment. 4. Evidence of periodontal or gingival problems. 5. Endodontic treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Labial alveolar bone thicknessChange from baseline in Labial alveolar bone thickness at 6 monthsLabial alveolar bone thickness will be measured in millimeters using CBCT at the site neighboring to the widest point of the labiopalatal root in two levels separated by 3 mm (L1 and L2, respectively); these levels were set along the long axis of the incisor and located every 3 mm from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) level. Labial alveolar bone thickness was assessed at the cervical level (L1) and midroot level (L2) at T0 and T1.
Apical root resorptionChange from baseline in Apical root resorption at 6 monthsApical root resorption will be measured in millimeters using CBCT by determining the difference in the total tooth length, which was measured from the incisal border to the root apex, between T0 and T1 (T1-T0).

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactDr. Shaza M. Hammad, Associate Professor
shazamohammad@yahoo.com00201014910066

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026