Skip to content

A Study to Compare Administration Schedules of G-CSF (Filgrastim) for Primary Prophylaxis of Febrile Neutropenia

A Multi Centre Study to Compare Administration Schedules of G-CSF (Filgrastim) for Primary Prophylaxis of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia in Early Stage Breast Cancer (REaCT-G2)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02816164
Acronym
REaCT-G2
Enrollment
324
Registered
2016-06-28
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2019-02-28
Last updated
2019-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Early Stage Breast Cancer

Brief summary

In patients with early-stage breast cancer, chemotherapy has substantially improved survival rates. Improvements in outcomes, however, are compromised by the considerable toxicities associated with chemotherapy, the most notable being neutropenia. Neutropenia is the presence of abnormally few white blood cells, leading to increase susceptibility to infection and can require hospitalization and need for intravenous antibiotics and is sometimes fatal. Febrile neutropenia (FN) can also be associated with treatment delays and dose reductions, potentially compromising treatment efficacy. Patients can receive medication to reduce the risk of FN such as Neupogen (filgrastim) as a daily injection for 5, 7 or 10 days. Since there is genuine uncertainty among healthcare professionals as to which administration schedule of Neupogen is the best for patients, the investigators are performing a randomized study for which patients will receive either 5, 7 or 10 days of Neupogen. Neupogen can cost approximately $200/injection, so if a physician prescribes 10 days for 8 cycles of treatment, this can cost $16,000 compared to a 5 day treatment which would cost half this. In addition to cost savings, many patients are not able to give themselves injections on a daily basis and require nursing resources which are utilized at high cost. This study will use an oral consent model to compare 5, 7 and 10 days of Neupogen to evaluate rates of febrile neutropenia and hospitalization.

Interventions

Subcutaneous injections

Sponsors

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed primary breast cancer * Planned to start docetaxel component of FEC-D or AC-D, or first cycle of; dose-dense AC-T, TC, FEC-D or TAC chemotherapy * ≥19 years of age * Able to provide verbal consent

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to Filgrastim

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Febrile neutropenia2 yearsNumber of participants with febrile neutropenia
Treatment-related hospitalization2 yearsNumber of participants admitted to emergency for treatment-related reasons

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Chemotherapy dose delay2 yearsNumber of participants who experience a dose delay with their chemotherapy treatment
Chemotherapy dose reduction2 yearsNumber of participants who experience a dose reduction in their chemotherapy treatment
Chemotherapy discontinuation2 yearsNumber of participants who stop chemotherapy for any reason

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026