Skip to content

Bone Health in Aging HIV Infected Women

Bone Health in Aging HIV Infected Women: Improvement or Prevention of Changes in Bone Mineral Density by Switching Antiretroviral Agents. Is There an Optimal Time to Intervene?

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02815566
Acronym
BEING
Enrollment
34
Registered
2016-06-28
Start date
2017-09-12
Completion date
2021-02-25
Last updated
2024-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis, HIV, Menopause

Keywords

kidney, antiretroviral agent, tenofovir, osteoporosis, women

Brief summary

Design: Open-label randomised multicenter international strategic trial of older women on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) containing tenofovir-emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) with HIV RNA suppression for \> 6 months to : 1. Immediate switch of TDF/FTC to tenofovir alafenamide-emtricitabine (TAF/FTC) while continuing the third antiretroviral agent.; 2. Delayed switch; with switch of TDF/FTC to TAF/FTC at 48 weeks while continuing the third agent. Follow up of all subjects to 96 weeks. Subject Population: The anticipated sample size is 128 HIV infected women aged 45-55 years (peri or early post menopause). . Primary endpoint: Percentage change from baseline bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine at weeks 48 and 96. Secondary Endpoints: BMD change at hip, trabecular bone score, estimated bone strength by high resolution peripheral quantitative computerized tomography (HR-pQCT), muscle quality, geriatric assessment; biomarkers of bone, immune activation and inflammation; HIV viral suppression; safety, lipid and renal function, cardiovascular risk scores at weeks 48 and 96. Expected Outcomes: To determine if a switch from TDF/FTC to TAF?FTC improves BMD to a degree correlating with a decreased risk of fragility fracture in aging HIV infected women. Secondary outcomes will assess bone strength using new imaging modalities, timing of switch, and renal health. This data will be used by health policy makers and providers to determine the proper use of TAF/FTC in the aging HIV population.

Detailed description

A Randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) of immediate vs delayed switch from TDF/FTC to TAF/FTC to define the impact of switching ARV on BMD in different stages of the aging trajectory in HIV infected women. Included is a geriatric assessment based on the conceptualization of health transition across menopause. Study Hypothesis: The primary hypothesis is that switching from TDF/FTC will improve BMD to a degree that correlates with a lower fracture risk in aging HIV+ women. We will further explore our theory that the impact is greater in those in the early stages of menopause and in those who also receive a protease inhibitor (PI) as the third antiretroviral agent (ARV). Primary objectives: To determine if: 1. Switching HIV+ women on TDF/FTC to TAF/FTC increases BMD at the spine at 48 weeks relative to those who continue TDF/FTC 2. To determine if any observed improvements continue or stabilize in the year after switch. Hypothesis generating objectives: To determine if the effect of switching from TDF/FTC to TAF/FTC on BMD varies by stage of menopause and by third ARV. Study design: This study is double blind placebo controlled randomised, 1:1, multicentre strategic trial. Patients will be randomised to immediate vs delayed switch, with randomization allocation arranged to minimize differences between treatment group with respect to stage of menopause (peri- menopause vs early post menopause) and site. Study population: HIV positive women who are in the peri-menopausal period or those within 10 years post menopause to capture those with greatest risk of BMD loss. As menopause typically occurs earlier in HIV + women we include those aged 45-55 years. They must be on a cART regimen containing TDF/FTC with HIV RNA \<50 c/ml for at least 6 months. Intervention: 1. Immediate switch of TDF/FTC to TAF/FTC while maintaining the third ARV agent. 2. Delayed switch of TDF/FTC to TAF/FTC at 48 weeks while maintaining the third ARV agent. Randomization: A computer-generated randomization list will be prepared prior to study onset by a statistician unassociated with the study. Randomization will be stratified by study centre. Primary endpoint: Comparison of the immediate vs delayed group in the % change from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine at week 48 and 96. Secondary endpoints: Will compare changes between the immediate and delayed group from data collected at screening or baseline and weeks 48 and 96. * change from baseline in BMD at hip Changes in Bone architecture as determined by Trabecular bone scan (TBS) and HRpQCT (high resolution peripheral quantitative computerized tomography) (Toronto site) Changes in 10 year fracture risk determined by country specific FRAX® (fracture risk assessment) calculator * with HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/ml Change from baseline in geriatric functional measures: frailty, performance and balance Change from baseline in muscle quality: Sarcopenia - grip strength measured by a Dynamometer Change from baseline in lipid values and Framingham cardiovascular risk scores Changes in renal tubular and glomerular function: GFR (glomerular filtration rate), Creatinine, urine albumin /creatinine and protein/creatinine, glucosuria Safety (clinical and laboratory adverse events) Changes in biomarkers of inflammation, coagulation and bone metabolism Tolerability (EuroQoL questionnaire)

Interventions

DRUGtenofovir-alafenamide-emtricitabine

comparison of tenofovir-emtricitabine and tenofovir-alafenamide-emtricitabine on bone mineral density

comparison of tenofovir-emtricitabine and tenofovir-alafenamide-emtricitabine on bone mineral density

Sponsors

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
CollaboratorOTHER
San Raffaele University Hospital, Italy
CollaboratorOTHER
Gilead Sciences
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network
CollaboratorNETWORK
University Health Network, Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Biological female aged 40-60 2. Documented HIV-1 infection 3. Peri-menopausal ( as documented by history). 4. Signed Informed Consent Form and willing to comply with the protocol. 5. Receiving a cART regimen containing a ritonavir boosted PI (darunavir, atazanavir, lopinavir,) or an NNRTI (efavirenz, nevirapine or rilpivirine) or an integrase inhibitor (dolutegravir or raltegravir or elvitegravir) in combination with TDF-FTC for \> 24 weeks. 6. Stable viral suppression (plasma HIV-RNA\<50 copies/mL for \> 24 weeks). Single viral blip \<500/ml allowed if re-suppresses. 7. If of childbearing potential, is using effective birth control methods and is willing to continue during the trial. 8. Women will be assessed for vitamin D and calcium dietary intake; if inadequate for age, supplements will be recommended.

Exclusion criteria

1. HIV-2 2. High 10-year fracture risk at baseline ( \> 20%) based on country specific FRAX 3. Current treatment with active bone medications- bisphosphonates, denosumab, calcitonin, raloxifene, teriparatide, strontium 4. Current use of systemic steroids ( inhaled steroids permitted) or chemotherapeutic agents 5. Acute viral hepatitis 6. Chronic hepatitis C with liver transaminases \>5 x ULN or expected to require treatment for hepatitis C during the trial period. 7. Any investigational ARV within 30 days. 8. Dialysis or renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \< 50ml/min) 9. History of decompensated liver disease (AST or ALT≥5x the upper limit of normal (ULN) or ALT ≥ 3 x ULN and bilirubin ≥ 1.5 x ULN with \> 35% direct bilirubin), or the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal or gastric varices. 10. Pregnant or breastfeeding 11. Screening blood result with any grade 3/4 toxicity according to Division of AIDS (DAIDS) grading scale, except: asymptomatic grade 3 amylase, creatinine phosphokinase, or lipid elevation. 12. Any condition (including illicit drug use or alcohol abuse) or lab results which, in the investigator's opinion, interfere with assessments or completion of the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density From Baseline at the Lumbar SpineBaseline, 48 weeks and 96 weeksThe outcome measures presented are descriptive as enrollment in the clinical trial did not reach the target number of subjects needed to achieve target power and was insufficient to produce statistically reliable results. There are limited results at the week 48 timepoint due to the COVID pandemic.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
% Change in Bone Mineral Density From Baseline at the Femoral NeckBaseline, 48 weeks and 96 weeksThe outcome measures presented are descriptive as enrollment in the clinical trial did not reach the target number of subjects needed to achieve target power and was insufficient to produce statistically reliable results. There are limited results at the week 48 timepoint due to the COVID pandemic.

Countries

Canada, Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Immediate Switch
Open label tenofovir-alafenamide (25/10mg)-emtricitabine (200mg) tablet once daily by mouth for 96 weeks tenofovir-alafenamide-emtricitabine: comparison of tenofovir-emtricitabine and tenofovir-alafenamide-emtricitabine on bone mineral density
19
Delayed Switch
Open-label tenofovir (300mg)-emtricitabine (200mg) tablet once daily by mouth for 48 weeks followed by open label tenofovir-alafenamide (25/10mg)-emtricitabine (200mg) tablet once daily by mouth for an additional 48 weeks tenofovir-emtricitabine: comparison of tenofovir-emtricitabine and tenofovir-alafenamide-emtricitabine on bone mineral density
15
Total34

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalImmediate SwitchDelayed Switch
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
34 Participants19 Participants15 Participants
Age, Continuous50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
52.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
48.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
20 Participants10 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
24 Participants13 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
10 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants19 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 150 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 150 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 190 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density From Baseline at the Lumbar Spine

The outcome measures presented are descriptive as enrollment in the clinical trial did not reach the target number of subjects needed to achieve target power and was insufficient to produce statistically reliable results. There are limited results at the week 48 timepoint due to the COVID pandemic.

Time frame: Baseline, 48 weeks and 96 weeks

Population: Thirty-four women enrolled: 19 in the immediate and 15 in the delayed switch arm between Sept 2017 and April 2019; 30 completed the 96-week protocol. The study closed to follow up March 2021. Two participants in the delayed arm inadvertently switched to TAF at baseline and one participant in the delayed arm remained on TDF for the entire 96 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Immediate SwitchPercent Change in Bone Mineral Density From Baseline at the Lumbar Spine48 weeks1.97 Percent Change
Immediate SwitchPercent Change in Bone Mineral Density From Baseline at the Lumbar Spine96 weeks2.33 Percent Change
Delayed SwitchPercent Change in Bone Mineral Density From Baseline at the Lumbar Spine48 weeks-2.32 Percent Change
Delayed SwitchPercent Change in Bone Mineral Density From Baseline at the Lumbar Spine96 weeks0.7 Percent Change
Secondary

% Change in Bone Mineral Density From Baseline at the Femoral Neck

The outcome measures presented are descriptive as enrollment in the clinical trial did not reach the target number of subjects needed to achieve target power and was insufficient to produce statistically reliable results. There are limited results at the week 48 timepoint due to the COVID pandemic.

Time frame: Baseline, 48 weeks and 96 weeks

Population: Thirty-four women enrolled: 19 in the immediate and 15 in the delayed switch arm between Sept 2017 and April 2019; 30 completed the 96-week protocol. The study closed to follow up March 2021. Two participants in the delayed arm inadvertently switched to TAF at baseline and one participant in the delayed arm remained on TDF for the entire 96 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Immediate Switch% Change in Bone Mineral Density From Baseline at the Femoral Neck48 weeks1.46 Percent Change
Immediate Switch% Change in Bone Mineral Density From Baseline at the Femoral Neck96 weeks2.33 Percent Change
Delayed Switch% Change in Bone Mineral Density From Baseline at the Femoral Neck48 weeks0.22 Percent Change
Delayed Switch% Change in Bone Mineral Density From Baseline at the Femoral Neck96 weeks0.70 Percent Change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026