Skip to content

Cyclobenzaprine HCl Extended Release 15 mg Versus Placebo in Treatment of Cervical and/or Lower Back Pain Due to Muscle Spasms of Local Origin

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Cyclobenzaprine HCl Extended Release (CER) 15 mg in Subjects With Acute Cervical and/or Lower Back Pain Due to Muscle Spasms of Local Origin

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02814565
Enrollment
180
Registered
2016-06-27
Start date
2016-10-12
Completion date
2017-03-14
Last updated
2019-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain, Neck Pain, Spasm

Keywords

Drug therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride (HCl) extended release (CER) 15 mg capsule once daily in participants with muscle spasms associated with acute painful musculoskeletal conditions.

Detailed description

The drug being tested in this study was cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride (HCl) extended-release (CER). CER was being tested to treat participants who had muscle spasms associated with acute painful musculoskeletal conditions. This study looked at medication helpfulness, relief from muscle spasms and pain, and improvement in range of motion and daily living activities. The study enrolled 180 participants. Participants were randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to one of the two treatment groups which remained undisclosed to the participant and study doctor during the study: * CER 15 mg * Placebo (dummy inactive pill) - this was a capsule that looks like the study drug but had no active ingredient All participants were asked to take one capsule at the same time each day throughout the study. This multi-center trial was conducted in the Russian Federation. The overall time to participate in this study was up to 45 days. Participants made multiple visits to the clinic, and were contacted by telephone after the last dose of study drug for a follow-up assessment.

Interventions

Cyclobenzaprine HCl extended-release capsules

DRUGPlacebo

Cyclobenzaprine HCl extended release placebo-matching capsules

Sponsors

Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. In the opinion of the investigator, the participant is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements. 2. Signs and dates a written, informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures. 3. Is experiencing for no more than 14 days cervical or lower back pain (as assessed by the participant) due to muscle spasms (confirmed by the physician) associated with acute, painful musculoskeletal conditions. 4. Is male or female and aged 18 to 50 years, inclusive. 5. Female participants require to be either 2 years postmenopausal or surgically sterile by bilateral tubal ligation, hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy, or, if premenopausal, had to be using an approved contraceptive method. 6. Female participants of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) test result for pregnancy at study entry. 7. After signing the informed consent form, the participant agrees not to make changes to dietary, exercise, or smoking habits and not to enter a weight loss program during his/her participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Has muscular pain secondary to acute trauma or fractures (e.g., due to osteoporosis). Such conditions could have been ruled out based on medical history, x-ray, or physical examination. 2. Has received any investigational compound within 30 days prior to Screening. 3. If female, the participant is pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant before, during, or within 1 month after participating in this study; or intending to donate ova during such time period. 4. Has a history of drug abuse or recent (within the last 12 months) history of excessive alcohol consumption defined as \>2 drinks/day (\>90 ml of 80 proof alcohol or equivalent). 5. Has mild, moderate, severe liver impairment. 6. Is an immediate family member, study site employee, or is in a dependent relationship with a study site employee who is involved in conduct of this study (eg, spouse, parent, child, sibling) or may consent under duress. 7. Takes any concomitant medication including over-the-counter and herbal products for muscle spasms. If a participant is taking such medications, the medications has to be discontinued before starting the study. 8. Takes or took within last 14 days medications, such as: 1. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs); 2. serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs); 3. tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs); 4. monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors; 5. tramadol; 6. bupropion; 7. meperidine; 8. verapamil; 9. non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); 10. topical anti-inflammatory medications 9. Has a history or clinical manifestations of significant medical condition, such as: 1. hyperthyroidism; 2. acute recovery phase of myocardial infarction; 3. arrhythmias, heart block or conduction disturbances; 4. congestive heart failure; 5. angle-closure glaucoma; 6. urinary retention; 7. increased intraocular pressure. 10. Has abnormal physical findings or a medical condition that might have placed the participant at risk or interfered with the participant's ability to participate in the study. 11. Has any known condition or disorder that might have affected absorption of the study drug. 12. Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergies to cyclobenzaprine and/or tricyclic antidepressants or any of their components. 13. Has a history of hypersensitivity to any NSAIDs including salicylate sensitivity. 14. Has a history of thrombocytopenia. 15. Has a history of gastro-intestinal bleeding, cerebrovascular bleeding or other bleeding disorders. 16. Had active or history of recurrent peptic ulcer/haemorrhage (two or more distinct episodes of proven ulceration or bleeding) 17. Has a history of severe renal impairment 18. Had a major surgery during the 6 months preceding study entry. 19. Has a language barrier or any other problems precluding good communication or cooperation. 20. Has any reason to believe that he/she would not be able to complete the evaluations needed in this study. 21. Has a known history of positive screen for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody. 22. Drug abuse in anamnesis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3Participants assessed the study medication helpfulness on a daily basis (in the daily diary), using the following 5-point rating scale: How would you rate this study medication in improving your condition? 0 = poor, 1 = fair, 2 = good, 3 = very good, 4 = excellent.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3The investigator assessed their clinical global impression of change compared to Baseline, based on physical examination, degree of muscle spasm (presence of muscle spasm assessment), reaction to palpation (presence of local pain assessment), limitation of range of motion, and evaluation of the patient's reported functional assessment (limitation of activities of daily living assessment). The following 5-point rating scale was used: 1 = worse, 2 = no change, 3 = slight improvement, 4 = moderate improvement, 5 = marked improvement.
Percentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDays 7 and 15The investigator assessed their clinical global impression of change compared to Baseline, based on physical examination, degree of muscle spasm (presence of muscle spasm assessment), reaction to palpation (presence of local pain assessment), limitation of range of motion, and evaluation of the patient's reported functional assessment (limitation of activities of daily living assessment). The following 5-point rating scale was used: 1 = worse, 2 = no change, 3 = slight improvement, 4 = moderate improvement, 5 = marked improvement.
Percentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDays 3, 7, and 14Participants assessed their clinical global impression based on relief from local pain, restriction in activities of daily living, restriction of movement and intensity of local pain on a daily basis. The following 5-point rating scale was used: 1 = worse, 2 = no change, 3 = slight improvement, 4 = moderate improvement, 5 = marked improvement.
Percentage of Responders on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDays 3, 7, and 14A responder was defined as a participant who had both a rating of either very good or excellent for the participant's rating of medication helpfulness.
Percentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDays 7 and 14Participants assessed the study medication helpfulness on a daily basis (in the daily diary), using the following 5-point rating scale: How would you rate this study medication in improving your condition? 0 = poor, 1 = fair, 2 = good, 3 = very good, 4 = excellent.
Percentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDays 3, 7, and 15The investigator assessed local pain based on physical examination, reaction to palpation (presence of local pain assessment). The following 5-point rating scale was used: 1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = moderately severe, 5 = severe.
Percentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDays 3, 7, and 15The investigator assessed limitation of range of motion. The following 5-point rating scale was used: 1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = moderately severe, 5 = severe.
Percentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDays 3, 7, and 15The investigator assessed limitation of activities based on evaluation of the patient's reported functional assessment. The following 5-point rating scale was used: 1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = moderately severe, 5 = severe.
Percentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDays 3, 7, and 15The investigator assessment based on physical examination, presence of muscle spasm (presence of muscle spasm assessment). The following 5-point rating scale was used: 1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = moderately severe, 5 = severe.

Countries

Russia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 10 investigative sites in the Russian Federation from 12 October 2016 to 14 March 2017.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with a diagnosis of acute cervical and/or lower back pain due to muscle spasms of local origin were enrolled equally in one of two treatment groups: Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mg or placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mg
Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride (HCl) extended-release, 15 mg capsules, orally, once daily for 14 days.
90
Placebo
Cyclobenzaprine HCl extended release placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for 14 days.
90
Total180

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy01
Overall StudySubject decision, caused by AE Influenza11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboCyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mg
Age, Continuous32.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
31.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
33.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Height170.5 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
169.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
171.8 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
European (Caucasian)
180 Participants90 Participants90 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
180 Participants90 Participants90 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
110 Participants62 Participants48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
70 Participants28 Participants42 Participants
Smoking Status
Current smoker
19 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
Smoking Status
Former smoker
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Smoking Status
Never smoked
157 Participants79 Participants78 Participants
Weight68.64 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.25
66.22 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.61
71.05 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.53

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 900 / 90
other
Total, other adverse events
21 / 9012 / 90
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 900 / 90

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Day 3 of Treatment

Participants assessed the study medication helpfulness on a daily basis (in the daily diary), using the following 5-point rating scale: How would you rate this study medication in improving your condition? 0 = poor, 1 = fair, 2 = good, 3 = very good, 4 = excellent.

Time frame: Day 3

Population: FAS included participants who received at least one dose of investigation product, analyzed according to original treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 1=fair60.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 3=very good3.3 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 2=good16.7 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 4=excellent0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 0=poor20.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 4=excellent0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 0=poor28.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 1=fair46.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 2=good22.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 3=very good2.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: The 2-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.6179Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of Treatment

The investigator assessed limitation of activities based on evaluation of the patient's reported functional assessment. The following 5-point rating scale was used: 1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = moderately severe, 5 = severe.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, and 15

Population: FAS included participants who received at least one dose of investigation product, analyzed according to original treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 5=severe0.0 percentage of percentage
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 4=moderately severe1.1 percentage of percentage
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 2=mild46.7 percentage of percentage
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 5=severe0.0 percentage of percentage
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 1=none18.9 percentage of percentage
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 1=none50.0 percentage of percentage
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 4=moderately severe2.2 percentage of percentage
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 2=mild45.6 percentage of percentage
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 2=mild62.2 percentage of percentage
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 3=moderate4.4 percentage of percentage
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 3=moderate46.7 percentage of percentage
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 4=moderately severe0.0 percentage of percentage
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 3=moderate17.8 percentage of percentage
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 5=severe0.0 percentage of percentage
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 1=none4.4 percentage of percentage
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 5=severe0.0 percentage of percentage
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 1=none5.6 percentage of percentage
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 2=mild50.0 percentage of percentage
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 3=moderate38.9 percentage of percentage
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 4=moderately severe5.6 percentage of percentage
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 5=severe0.0 percentage of percentage
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 1=none10.0 percentage of percentage
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 2=mild63.3 percentage of percentage
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 3=moderate26.7 percentage of percentage
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 4=moderately severe0.0 percentage of percentage
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 5=severe0.0 percentage of percentage
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 1=none41.1 percentage of percentage
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 2=mild53.3 percentage of percentage
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 3=moderate5.6 percentage of percentage
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Activities of Daily Living on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 4=moderately severe0.0 percentage of percentage
Comparison: Day 3. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.692Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Comparison: Day 7. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.0749Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Comparison: Day 15. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.2371Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of Treatment

The investigator assessed limitation of range of motion. The following 5-point rating scale was used: 1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = moderately severe, 5 = severe.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, and 15

Population: FAS included participants who received at least one dose of investigation product, analyzed according to original treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 4=moderately severe0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 2=mild40.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 1=none22.2 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 1=none44.4 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 4=moderately severe5.6 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 2=mild48.9 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 2=mild51.1 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 3=moderate6.7 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 3=moderate47.8 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 4=moderately severe0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 3=moderate26.7 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 1=none6.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 1=none4.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 2=mild37.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 3=moderate52.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 4=moderately severe5.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 1=none13.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 2=mild51.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 3=moderate35.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 4=moderately severe0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 1=none38.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 2=mild47.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 3=moderate13.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Limitation of Range of Motion on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 4=moderately severe0.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 3. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.5275Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Comparison: Day 7. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.088Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Comparison: Day 15. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.2542Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of Treatment

The investigator assessed local pain based on physical examination, reaction to palpation (presence of local pain assessment). The following 5-point rating scale was used: 1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = moderately severe, 5 = severe.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, and 15

Population: FAS included participants who received at least one dose of investigation product, analyzed according to original treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 4=moderately severe1.1 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 2=mild24.4 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 1=none6.7 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 1=none35.6 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 4=moderately severe7.8 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 2=mild51.1 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 2=mild55.6 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 3=moderate12.2 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 3=moderate66.7 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 4=moderately severe1.1 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 3=moderate36.7 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 1=none1.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 1=none1.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 2=mild21.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 3=moderate66.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 4=moderately severe11.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 1=none2.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 2=mild50.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 3=moderate46.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 4=moderately severe1.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 1=none25.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 2=mild50.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 3=moderate24.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Local Pain on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 4=moderately severe0.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 3. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.4428Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Comparison: Day 7. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.1163Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Comparison: Day 15. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.0489Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of Treatment

The investigator assessment based on physical examination, presence of muscle spasm (presence of muscle spasm assessment). The following 5-point rating scale was used: 1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = moderately severe, 5 = severe.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, and 15

Population: FAS included participants who received at least one dose of investigation product, analyzed according to original treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 4=moderately severe0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 2=mild27.8 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 1=none14.4 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 1=none48.9 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 4=moderately severe7.8 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 2=mild37.8 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 2=mild47.8 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 3=moderate13.3 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 3=moderate62.2 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 4=moderately severe0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 3=moderate37.8 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 1=none2.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 1=none2.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 2=mild21.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 3=moderate66.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 4=moderately severe10.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 3, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 1=none5.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 2=mild53.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 3=moderate38.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 4=moderately severe2.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 5=severe0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 1=none32.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 2=mild47.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 3=moderate20.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician Rated Assessment of Presence of Muscle Spasm on Days 3, 7, and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 4=moderately severe0.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 3. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.302Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Comparison: Day 7. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.2367Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Comparison: Day 15. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.025Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Day 3 of Treatment

The investigator assessed their clinical global impression of change compared to Baseline, based on physical examination, degree of muscle spasm (presence of muscle spasm assessment), reaction to palpation (presence of local pain assessment), limitation of range of motion, and evaluation of the patient's reported functional assessment (limitation of activities of daily living assessment). The following 5-point rating scale was used: 1 = worse, 2 = no change, 3 = slight improvement, 4 = moderate improvement, 5 = marked improvement.

Time frame: Day 3

Population: FAS included participants who received at least one dose of investigation product, analyzed according to original treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 2=no change52.2 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 4=moderate improvement11.1 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 3=slight improvement35.6 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 5=marked improvement0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 1=worse1.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 5=marked improvement2.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 1=worse0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 2=no change68.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 3=slight improvement25.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Day 3 of TreatmentDay 3, 4=moderate improvement3.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.0393Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of Treatment

The investigator assessed their clinical global impression of change compared to Baseline, based on physical examination, degree of muscle spasm (presence of muscle spasm assessment), reaction to palpation (presence of local pain assessment), limitation of range of motion, and evaluation of the patient's reported functional assessment (limitation of activities of daily living assessment). The following 5-point rating scale was used: 1 = worse, 2 = no change, 3 = slight improvement, 4 = moderate improvement, 5 = marked improvement.

Time frame: Days 7 and 15

Population: FAS included participants who received at least one dose of investigation product, analyzed according to original treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 1=worse2.2 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 2=no change8.9 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 3=slight improvement52.2 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 4=moderate improvement27.8 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 5=marked improvement8.9 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 1=worse1.1 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 2=no change5.6 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 3=slight improvement27.8 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 4=moderate improvement30.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 5=marked improvement35.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 3=slight improvement34.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 1=worse0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 1=worse1.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 2=no change26.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 5=marked improvement21.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 3=slight improvement44.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 2=no change11.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 4=moderate improvement24.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 15, 4=moderate improvement32.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Physician's Clinical Global Assessment on Days 7 and 15 of TreatmentDay 7, 5=marked improvement4.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 7. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.033Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Comparison: Day 15. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.0262Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of Treatment

Participants assessed their clinical global impression based on relief from local pain, restriction in activities of daily living, restriction of movement and intensity of local pain on a daily basis. The following 5-point rating scale was used: 1 = worse, 2 = no change, 3 = slight improvement, 4 = moderate improvement, 5 = marked improvement.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, and 14

Population: FAS included participants who received at least one dose of investigation product, analyzed according to original treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 3, 5=marked improvement0.0 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 4=moderate improvement22.2 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 3, 2=no change45.6 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 5=marked improvement7.8 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 1=worse4.4 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 1=worse1.1 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 3, 4=moderate improvement3.3 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 2=no change14.4 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 2=no change13.3 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 3=slight improvement24.4 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 3, 3=slight improvement47.8 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 4=moderate improvement27.8 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 3=slight improvement52.2 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 5=marked improvement32.2 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 3, 1=worse3.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 5=marked improvement23.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 3, 1=worse1.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 3, 2=no change56.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 3, 3=slight improvement33.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 3, 4=moderate improvement7.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 3, 5=marked improvement1.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 1=worse1.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 2=no change25.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 3=slight improvement43.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 4=moderate improvement25.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 5=marked improvement4.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 1=worse1.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 2=no change26.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 3=slight improvement20.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject-Rated Global Impression on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 4=moderate improvement28.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 3. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.5756Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Comparison: Day 7. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.4395Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Comparison: Day 14. The 2-sample Wilcoxon sum rank test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.0905Wilcoxon Sum Rank Test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of Treatment

Participants assessed the study medication helpfulness on a daily basis (in the daily diary), using the following 5-point rating scale: How would you rate this study medication in improving your condition? 0 = poor, 1 = fair, 2 = good, 3 = very good, 4 = excellent.

Time frame: Days 7 and 14

Population: FAS included participants who received at least one dose of investigation product, analyzed according to original treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 0=poor7.8 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 1=fair41.1 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 2=good35.6 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 3=very good13.3 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 4=excellent2.2 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 0=poor8.9 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 1=fair25.6 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 2=good25.6 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 3=very good22.2 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 4=excellent17.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 2=good28.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 0=poor16.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 0=poor14.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 1=fair34.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 4=excellent11.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 2=good34.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 1=fair25.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 3=very good11.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 14, 3=very good20.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Subject's Rating of Medication Helpfulness Impression on Days 7 and 14 of TreatmentDay 7, 4=excellent3.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 7. The 2-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.4338Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Day 14. The 2-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.1657Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Secondary

Percentage of Responders on Days 3, 7, and 14 of Treatment

A responder was defined as a participant who had both a rating of either very good or excellent for the participant's rating of medication helpfulness.

Time frame: Days 3, 7, and 14

Population: FAS included participants who received at least one dose of investigation product, analyzed according to original treatment assignment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Responders on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 33.3 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Responders on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 715.6 percentage of participants
Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mgPercentage of Responders on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 1440.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 32.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 714.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders on Days 3, 7, and 14 of TreatmentDay 1431.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: Day 3. A two-tailed Fisher's exact test to compare the number of responders between the Placebo and the Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mg treatment group to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Comparison: Day 7. A two-tailed Fisher's exact test to compare the number of responders between the Placebo and the Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mg treatment group to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Comparison: Day 14. A two-tailed Fisher's exact test to compare the number of responders between the Placebo and the Cyclobenzaprine HCl 15 mg treatment group to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance.p-value: 0.2757Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026