Skip to content

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Nebulization Bronchodilators Under High Nasal Flow Humidified

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Nebulization Bronchodilators Under High Nasal Flow Humidified Compared to a Usual Method

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02812979
Acronym
AirvoNEB
Enrollment
25
Registered
2016-06-24
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
2018-04-27
Last updated
2025-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Brief summary

The principal objective is to show noninferiority of nebulized salbutamol through the high flow nasal system moistened AIRVO ™ 2 in terms of reversibility of airflow obstruction compared to nebulization by the usual method (spray mask).

Detailed description

Randomized, comparative, non inferiority study between two nebulization strategies bronchodilators, one according to the method tested namely the spray - in across the top humidified nasal flow system and the other according to a customary procedure, through a mask. A third arm will be evaluated (control arm) to overcome a possible own bronchodilator effect of high flow nasal humidified.

Interventions

DEVICEAirvo2 with Aerogen Solo

Nebulization of salbutamol with Airvo 2 and Aerogen solo

DEVICEMask

Usual nebulization of salbutamol with mask

DEVICEarm control Airvo2 without nebulization of salbutamol

Airvo2 with Aerogen Solo. No nebulization of salbutamol

Sponsors

University Hospital, Tours
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adults * Patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease * Patients, when performing lung function tests performed outside of the study : 1. A report FEV / FVC less than 60% prior to bronchodilator treatment AND 2. A positive reversal test defined by FEV variation of over 12 % and 200 mL after administration of inhaled salbutamol * Patients affiliated to social security scheme * Informed consent signed by the patient

Exclusion criteria

* Exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during * Uncontrolled asthma * Pneumothorax current or recent ( \< 2 months) * Pleural aspiration or biopsy , trans - bronchial biopsies and / or bronchoalveolar lavage in the preceding 48h * hemoptysis in progress * Patient under guardianship or trusteeship safeguard justice * Pregnant or breastfeeding women or parturient woman * Known allergy or intolerance to salbutamol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Increased expiratory volume in one second ( FEV )measured before and after nebulization of salbutamol at 0 minute and 15 minutes after nebulization of salbutamol

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
clinical data (FVC) on the physiological effects of high nasal flowbefore and after treatment with humidified high nasal flow at 0 minute and 30 minutes after the treatment with humidified high nasal flow
clinical data (FEV) on the physiological effects of high nasal flowbefore and after treatment with humidified high nasal flow at 0 minute and 30 minutes after the treatment with humidified high nasal flow
clinical data (FEV / FVC) on the physiological effects of high nasal flowbefore and after treatment with humidified high nasal flow at 0 minute and 30 minutes after the treatment with humidified high nasal flow

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026