Skip to content

Comparison of Anorectal Manometry and 3D Manometry in Diagnosis of Functional Disorders in Children

Comparison of High-resolution Anorectal Manometry and 3D High-definition Anorectal Manometry in Diagnosis of Functional Disorders in Children

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02812823
Enrollment
100
Registered
2016-06-24
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
2019-03-31
Last updated
2018-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Children, Constipation, Fecal Incontinence

Keywords

manometry, children, constipation, functional disorders

Brief summary

Pressures measured by manometric solid-state catheters may differ according to the type of the catheter and specific anatomy and physiology of anorectum. The aim of the study is to establish the difference in recordings between 2 types of anorectal catheters used in pediatric patients and to validate the most appropriate way to diagnose of functional disorders.

Detailed description

Patients enrolled in study will be investigated by both types of anorectal catheters, first by anorectal high resolution flexible, thinner, solid-state catheter and after that with rigid, thicker, solid-state catheter. Both procedures will be undertaken during one session. There will be used standard protocol of the procedure that measures conventional manometric parameters (resting pressure, squeeze pressure, bear down manoeuver, thresholds of sensation and recto anal inhibitory reflex threshold.

Interventions

Recording of conventional manometric parameters after insertion of the catheters.

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Medical University of Warsaw
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Months to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Functional Constipation * Fecal Incontinence * Parental Agreement

Exclusion criteria

* After surgery on lower gastrointestinal tract * Diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disorders * Diagnosis of other disorders present in anorectal area, that may influence anorectal pressures * Lack of parental agreement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Resting pressure of the anorectal area20 secondsResting pressure will be measured after insertion catheter into anorectum. The software automatically record pressure while patient is lying on the bed. The parameter is recorded with 2 different types of anorectal catheters and the difference is evaluated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum squeeze pressure1 minPressure is recorded after the patient is asked to squeeze anorectum for 20 s (repeated 3 times).
Bear down manoeuver1 minPressures are recorded after the patient is asked to bear down for 20 s (repeated 2 times)
Thresholds of sensation1 minThe balloon at the top of the catheter is being filled with air until a patient is able to report sensation, urge and discomfort.
Recto anal inhibitory reflex5 minThe balloon at the top of the catheter is being filled with air until the relaxation of anal sphincter is observed.

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactMarcin Banasiuk, PhD
mbanasiu@tlen.pl+48223179463

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026