Skip to content

I-scan for Adenoma Detection

I-scan Versus Standard High-Definition White Light for the Detection of Adenomatous Polyps

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02811419
Enrollment
740
Registered
2016-06-23
Start date
2017-02-01
Completion date
2018-01-31
Last updated
2019-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Adenomatous Polyps

Brief summary

This study is a randomized controlled trial to determine whether i-scan can improve the detection of conventional adenomas and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps.

Detailed description

This is a randomized controlled trial comparing the use of i-scan (digital surface and contrast enhancement of the mucosa) versus standard high-definition white light for the detection of conventional adenomas and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps. Recent studies have indicated that colonoscopy is more effective in preventing cancer in the left side of the colon than the right side of the colon. The reasons for this difference may be partly biologic, in that a special group of polyps known as sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA) are located primarily proximal to the splenic flexure. Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps share molecular features with a group of cancers that occur primarily in the proximal colon. These molecular features include CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and microsatellite instability. These lesions are endoscopically subtle in that they are often flat, have the same color as the surrounding mucosa, and are hard to differentiate from normal mucosa. Recent studies have shown that image enhanced endoscopy can highlight the appearance of these lesions. This study will test whether i-scan increases the detection of conventional adenomas and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps in a randomized controlled trial.

Interventions

DEVICEi-scan

examination will be performed with i-scan digital enhancement

DEVICEstandard high-definition white light

examination will be performed with high-definition white light

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 50-75 * Intact colon and rectum * Willing to sign an informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects less than 50 years of age or greater than 75 years of age * Subjects who are in the inpatient unit * Subjects with diverticulitis, * Subjects with inflammatory bowel disease * Subjects with polyposis syndromes * Subjects with previous surgical resection of any portion of the colon or rectum * Subjects referred for endoscopic resection of previously diagnosed colorectal polyp

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants With Conventional Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detected12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants With Conventional Adenoma Detected12 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
I-scan
Inspection with i-scan surface enhancement i-scan: examination will be performed with i-scan digital enhancement
369
Standard High-definition White Light
Inspection with standard high-definition white light (usual care) standard high-definition white light: examination will be performed with high-definition white light
371
Total740

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicI-scanStandard High-definition White LightTotal
Age, Continuous61.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
body mass index27.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
26.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
26.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
369 Participants371 Participants740 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
369 participants371 participants740 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
185 Participants187 Participants372 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
184 Participants184 Participants368 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3690 / 371
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3690 / 371
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3690 / 371

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Conventional Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detected

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Intervention (I-scan)Number of Participants With Conventional Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detected208 Participants
Control (HDWL)Number of Participants With Conventional Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detected171 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Conventional Adenoma Detected

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Intervention (I-scan)Number of Participants With Conventional Adenoma Detected174 Participants
Control (HDWL)Number of Participants With Conventional Adenoma Detected140 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026