Skip to content

Effects of Long-term Foam Rolling Compared to Static Stretching on Hamstring Muscle Flexibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02808923
Enrollment
45
Registered
2016-06-22
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Muscle Hypertonia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study to to compare the long-term effects of foam rolling in comparison to static stretching and a control group on hamstring flexibility. The investigators hypothesize that participants in the foam rolling and static stretching group will demonstrate increased flexibility to the control group, but will a difference will not be observed between the foam rolling and static stretching groups.

Interventions

Participants will perform unilateral hamstring rolling for 2 repetitions of 1 minute with 15 second rest breaks on each leg with a 6x 36 foam roller.

OTHERStatic Stretching

Participants will perform supine static hamstring stretch on a wall for 2 repetitions of 1 minute with 15 second rest breaks on each leg. When the position no longer causes a moderate stretching sensation to the hamstring, subjects will move their bodies closer to the wall to intensify the stretch.

Sponsors

Creighton University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Active 90/90 hamstring length goniometric measurement of greater than 10 degrees at baseline * Active straight leg raise of less than 90 degrees

Exclusion criteria

* History of lower extremity injury including but not limited to sprain, strain, fracture, or any surgical intervention that lead to a decrease in activity greater than two weeks within the last six months * Current involvement in a lower extremity flexibility program outside of their regular activity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in 90/90 hamstring lengthBaseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeksParticipant is supine, hip flexed to 90 degrees, knee extension range of motion measured actively from 90 degree starting position with a standard goniometer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Active straight leg raise - Range of motionBaseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeksParticipant is supine, with contralateral leg straight the participant will actively raise the leg until end of range with hip flexion being measured by goniometer
Change in Active straight leg raise - Functional Movement ScreenBaseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeksParticipant is supine, with contralateral leg straight the participant will actively raise the leg until end of range. This end range will be compared to a standardized position using a dowel and will be scored according to the functional movement screen.
Change in Sit-and-reachBaseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeksUsing a standardized sit-and-reach box, participants will sit with legs together, knees extended, and hands overlapped and extended in front of the body. The subject will forward flex until end range of motion measured in centimeters.

Contacts

Primary ContactTrevor Schongalla, DPT
trevorschongalla@creighton.edu541-777-0686

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026