Skip to content

Treatment of Wounds With a New Adhesive Foam Dressing

A Prospective, Open Study to Evaluate the Clinical Performance of a New Adhesive Foam Dressing in the Treatment of Partial Thickness Burns, Acute and Chronic Wounds.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02807584
Enrollment
25
Registered
2016-06-21
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2016-07-31
Last updated
2018-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burns, Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

Wound, burns, acute, chronic, foam, adhesive, dressing

Brief summary

This study will look at whether ELECT, a new adhesive foam dressing, can offer an alternative to traditional wound care methods. Patients will be treated with ELECT for 14 days. Data relating to wound healing, the performance of the dressing and the opinion of the doctor will be collected. The hypothesis of this study is that the ELECT foam adhesive dressing is 'fit for purpose' and will be effective at treating a variety of wounds.

Interventions

DEVICEELECT

Sponsors

Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participants must be ≥1 years old 2. Males and females (females must not be pregnant and must use contraception if of child bearing potential) 3. Participant must have a partial thickness burn, acute or chronic wound that would benefit from the application of an advanced wound dressing to help facilitate moist wound healing 4. Presence of a suitable wound which can be treated with the available sizes of the ELECT Adhesive Foam Dressing (7.5cm x 7.5cm, 12.5cm x 12.5cm, 15cm x 15cm and 17.5cm x 17.5cm) 5. Participant is under the direct observation of the investigator for the duration of the study (i.e the participant's wound must not be treated by another clinician throughout the duration of the study). 6. The participant or the participant's legal representative is able to understand and is willing to consent to the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Participants with a known history of poor compliance with treatment (including if the participant has a known , diagnosed emotional or neurological condition such as mental disorders/illnesses, mental retardation, drug or alcohol abuse, that would pre-empt their ability to understand and consent) 2. Participants who are unable to understand the aims and objectives of the study. 3. Participant is a prisoner. 4. Participants with a known sensitivity to any of the constituents of the evaluation products, including polyester, polyurethane, and acrylic adhesive 5. Participants with facial wounds as the reference wound 6. Participants with confirmed or suspected clinically infected reference wounds (unless wounds are being treated per standard protocol for wound infection) 7. Participant is likely to undergo foreseeable definitive surgery within 2 weeks from screening 8. Participants where a reference wound cannot be treated in isolation from other wounds 9. Participants who have participated in this evaluation previously and closed/100% healed, or have been withdrawn from the study, or any previous studies 10. Participant who are employees of Smith & Nephew group companies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound progression, (percentage change in area) using a wound imaging measurement and wound documentation system14 daysusing a wound imaging, measurement and wound documentation system

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage change in wound volume14 days
Duration of dressing wear14 days
The proportion of wounds that have 100% healed or closed by secondary intention.14 days
Assessment of exudate type and amount14 daysAssessment using a modified Bates-Jensen Would Assessment Tool1 and T.I.M.E.2,3)
Assessment of Condition of the peri-wound skin14 daysAssessment using a modified Bates-Jensen Would Assessment Tool1 and T.I.M.E.2,3)
Assessment of the amount of tissue and skin colour14 daysAssessment using a modified Bates-Jensen Would Assessment Tool1 and T.I.M.E.2,3)
Percentage change in wound depth14 days
Pain on application and removal of dressing (using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) or FLACC scale)14 days
Reason for dressing change14 days
Ease of application and removal of the ELECT dressing using the visual analogue scale14 days
Overall clinician acceptability with the new dressing14 daysMeasured using a questionnaire
Clinician acceptability with dressing performance parameters14 daysMeasured using a questionnaire
Safety in use - all adverse events that occur during the study will be recorded14 days
Assessment of infection/clinical signs of infection14 daysAssessment using Normal Clinical practice

Countries

South Africa

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026