Skip to content

Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/Ritonavir, Ombitasvir, + Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C in Romania

Real World Evidence of the Effectiveness of Paritaprevir/r - Ombitasvir, + Dasabuvir, ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C - An Observational Study in Romania

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02807402
Enrollment
522
Registered
2016-06-21
Start date
2016-07-14
Completion date
2017-08-04
Last updated
2019-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hepatitis C

Keywords

Chronic Hepatitis C, Paritaprevir, Ombitasvir, Dasabuvir, HCV

Brief summary

This study seeks to provide evidence of the effectiveness and obtain patient reported outcome (PRO) data for the interferon-free regimen of paritaprevir (PTV)/ritonavir (r) + ombitasvir (OBV), + dasabuvir (DSV), +/- ribavirin (RBV) in participants with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in a real life setting across clinical practice patient populations in Romania.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

IST GmbH, Germany
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Treatment-naïve or -experienced adult male or female patients with confirmed CHC, genotype 1, receiving combination therapy with the interferon-free paritaprevir/ritonavir and ombitasvir with dasabuvir ± RBV according to standard of care and in line with the current local label If RBV is co-administered with the paritaprevir/ritonavir and ombitasvir with dasabuvir, it has been prescribed in line with the current local label (with special attention to contraception requirements and contraindication during pregnancy) Patients must voluntarily sign and date a patient authorization to use and/or disclose his/her anonymized health data prior to inclusion into the study Patient must not be participating or intending to participate in a concurrent interventional therapeutic trial

Exclusion criteria

None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virological Response 12 Weeks Post-treatment (SVR12)12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants in the Core Population With Sufficient Follow-up Data for SVR12 Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response 12 Weeks Post-treatment12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. The core population with sufficient follow-up data regarding SVR12 included all core population participants who * had evaluable HCV RNA data ≥ 70 days after the last actual dose of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir and dasabuvir * or a HCV RNA value ≥ 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline * or had HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline, but no HCV RNA measurement ≥ 70 days after the last actual dose of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir with dasabuvir due to reasons related to safety (e.g. dropped out due to adverse event) or virologic failure.
Percentage of Participants With RelapseEnd of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen) and up to 24 weeks after the end of treatment.Relapse was defined as participants with a virologic response (VR; HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL) at end of treatment (EOT) followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL at any time after the end of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Breakthrough12 or 24 weeks (depending on the treatment regimen)Breakthrough was defined as at least one documented HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL during treatment.
Percentage of Participants in Each Non-response Category 12 Weeks Post-treatment12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)SVR12 non-response was categorized according to the following: * On-treatment virologic failure (breakthrough \[at least one documented HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL during treatment\] or failure to suppress \[each measured on-treatment HCV RNA value ≥ 50 IU/mL\]); * Relapse, defined as HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL at EOT followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL post-treatment in patients who completed treatment (not more than 7 days shortened); * Death; * Premature treatment discontinuation with no on-treatment virological failure; * Missing SVR12 data and/or none of the above criteria.
Assigned Treatment RegimenBaselineTreatment regimen was assigned by the physician according to local practice and label. Participants could receive three direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs (paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir) with or without RBV for 12 or 24 weeks.
Percentage of the Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of DAAFrom first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen.Adherence to study treatment was calculated as: Cumulative dose taken / (initial prescribed dose \* planned duration)
Percentage of the Ribavirin Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of RibavirinFrom first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimenAdherence to study treatment was calculated as: Cumulative dose taken / (initial prescribed dose \* planned duration)
Percentage of Ribavirin (RBV) Treatment Days in Relation to the Target Number of Ribavirin Treatment DaysFrom first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen.
Number of Participants With ComorbiditiesBaseline
Percentage of Participants Achieving Virological Response at End of TreatmentEnd of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)Virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL.
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index ScoreBaseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatmentThe EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status. The 5 items in the EQ-5D-5L comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on 5 levels of severity (1: indicating no problem, 2: indicating slight problems, 3: indicating moderate problems, 4: indicating severe problems, 5: indicating extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS). Responses to the 5 dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score by applying country-specific weights.The range for EQ-5D-5L index score is 0 to 1 where '0' is defined as a health state equivalent to being dead and '1' is full health.The higher the score the better the health status.
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) VAS ScoreBaseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatmentThe EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status. with a separate visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS assesses overall health on a scale from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): AbsenteeismBaseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatmentThe WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity. Absenteeism indicates the percentage of work time missed due to health problems.
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): PresenteeismBaseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatmentThe WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity. Presenteeism indicates the percentage of impairment while working due to health problems.
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Work Productivity Impairment (TWP)Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatmentThe WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity. Total work productivity impairment (TWP) indicates the percentage of overall work impairment due to health problems.
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Activity ImpairmentBaseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatmentThe WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity. Total activity impairment (TAI) indicates the percentage of general (non-work) activity impairment due to health problems.
Change From Baseline in Patient Activation Measure 13 (PAM-13)Baseline and end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)PAM 13 is a measure used to assess the patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management, consisting of 13 questions. Each of the 13 items can be answered with one of four possible response options, which are disagree strongly (1), disagree (2), agree (3), agree strongly (4). Scores were summed to calculate the overall raw score, then transformed to a scale with a theoretical range 0 to 100, based on calibration tables, with higher PAM scores indicating higher patient activation
Change From Baseline in Beliefs Medication Questionnaire - (18-item BMQ)Baseline and end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)The BMQ consists of 2 sections and 18 questions to screen for patients' beliefs, attitudes and concerns about their medication. The BMQ-Specific section comprises two 5-item subscales assessing the necessity of and concerns about the prescribed medication (Specific-Necessity and Specific-Concerns). The BMQ-General section comprises two 4-item subscales assessing beliefs that medicines are harmful and overused by doctors in general (General-Harm and General-Overuse). The 18 items are rated on a Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Each subscale score ranges from 1 to 5. High scores in the Specific-Concerns scale represent the notion that adverse reactions are potentially harmful when taking medication on a regular basis, and high scores in the Specific-Necessity scale indicate the patient's need to adhere to medication to maintain health. High scores in the General-Harm and General-Overuse scales represent an overall negative perception of medication.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, or PregnanciesFrom first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose (16 or 28 weeks depending on the treatment regimen). The over all median (minimum, maximum) duration of treatment was 84 (28, 175) days.
Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant MedicationsFrom first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimenConcomitant medication other than for chronic hepatitis C used from the time when the decision was made to initiate treatment with paritaprevir/ritonavir and ombitasvir with or without dasabuvir until after the last dose.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

In this prospective, multi-center observational study a total of 522 adult patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 were enrolled by 22 centers in Romania.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin
Participants in this observational study received treatment with paritaprevir/ritonavir (r) and ombitasvir with or without dasabuvir ± ribavirin (RBV) for 12 or 24 weeks for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC), according to hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype/subtype and stage of liver disease. The prescription of treatment regimen was at the discretion of the physician in accordance with local clinical practice and label, and was made independently from this observational study and preceded the decision to offer the patient the opportunity to participate in this study.
522
Total522

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath3
Overall StudyFailure to Return1
Overall StudyOther2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParitaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin
Age, Continuous60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
Age, Customized
18-65 years
374 Participants
Age, Customized
66-84 years
147 Participants
Age, Customized
>=85 years
1 Participants
Cirrhosis Status
Cirrhosis
481 Participants
Cirrhosis Status
No cirrhosis
9 Participants
Cirrhosis Status
Transition to cirrhosis
32 Participants
HCV Genotype
Genotype 1a
4 Participants
HCV Genotype
Genotype 1b
517 Participants
HCV Genotype
Genotype 1, Subtype Unknown
1 Participants
HCV RNA5.87 log10 IU/mL
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
522 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
283 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
239 Participants
Years Since Diagnosis of HCV Infection6.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.69

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30 / 733 / 446
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 30 / 7344 / 446
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 33 / 7317 / 446

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virological Response 12 Weeks Post-treatment (SVR12)

Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug.

Time frame: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype). Three participants with genotype 1 prescribed paritaprevir/r and ombitasvir instead of paritaprevir/r, ombitasvir and dasabuvir (3DAA) were excluded.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virological Response 12 Weeks Post-treatment (SVR12)98.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Assigned Treatment Regimen

Treatment regimen was assigned by the physician according to local practice and label. Participants could receive three direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs (paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir) with or without RBV for 12 or 24 weeks.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype).

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinAssigned Treatment Regimen3 DAA without RBV (12 weeks)73 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinAssigned Treatment Regimen3 DAA + RBV (12 weeks)438 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinAssigned Treatment Regimen3 DAA + RBV (24 weeks)8 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Beliefs Medication Questionnaire - (18-item BMQ)

The BMQ consists of 2 sections and 18 questions to screen for patients' beliefs, attitudes and concerns about their medication. The BMQ-Specific section comprises two 5-item subscales assessing the necessity of and concerns about the prescribed medication (Specific-Necessity and Specific-Concerns). The BMQ-General section comprises two 4-item subscales assessing beliefs that medicines are harmful and overused by doctors in general (General-Harm and General-Overuse). The 18 items are rated on a Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Each subscale score ranges from 1 to 5. High scores in the Specific-Concerns scale represent the notion that adverse reactions are potentially harmful when taking medication on a regular basis, and high scores in the Specific-Necessity scale indicate the patient's need to adhere to medication to maintain health. High scores in the General-Harm and General-Overuse scales represent an overall negative perception of medication.

Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype) with available data at baseline and end of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Beliefs Medication Questionnaire - (18-item BMQ)Specific Concerns-0.26 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Beliefs Medication Questionnaire - (18-item BMQ)Specific Necessity-0.07 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Beliefs Medication Questionnaire - (18-item BMQ)General Overuse0.01 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Beliefs Medication Questionnaire - (18-item BMQ)General Harm-0.02 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Beliefs Medication Questionnaire - (18-item BMQ)General Harm0.10 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Beliefs Medication Questionnaire - (18-item BMQ)Specific Concerns0.06 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Beliefs Medication Questionnaire - (18-item BMQ)General Overuse0.01 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Beliefs Medication Questionnaire - (18-item BMQ)Specific Necessity-0.21 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score

The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status. The 5 items in the EQ-5D-5L comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on 5 levels of severity (1: indicating no problem, 2: indicating slight problems, 3: indicating moderate problems, 4: indicating severe problems, 5: indicating extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS). Responses to the 5 dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score by applying country-specific weights.The range for EQ-5D-5L index score is 0 to 1 where '0' is defined as a health state equivalent to being dead and '1' is full health.The higher the score the better the health status.

Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype) and with available data at baseline and each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index ScoreEnd of Treatment0.07 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score12 weeks post treatment0.09 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score24 weeks post treatment0.09 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index ScoreEnd of Treatment0.04 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score12 weeks post treatment0.08 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score24 weeks post treatment0.10 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) VAS Score

The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status. with a separate visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS assesses overall health on a scale from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).

Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype) and with available data at baseline and each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) VAS ScoreEnd of Treatment10.9 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) VAS Score12 weeks post treatment13.9 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) VAS Score24 weeks post treatment18.8 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) VAS ScoreEnd of Treatment8.36 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) VAS Score12 weeks post treatment12.7 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) VAS Score24 weeks post treatment15.2 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Activation Measure 13 (PAM-13)

PAM 13 is a measure used to assess the patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management, consisting of 13 questions. Each of the 13 items can be answered with one of four possible response options, which are disagree strongly (1), disagree (2), agree (3), agree strongly (4). Scores were summed to calculate the overall raw score, then transformed to a scale with a theoretical range 0 to 100, based on calibration tables, with higher PAM scores indicating higher patient activation

Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype) with available data at baseline and end of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Patient Activation Measure 13 (PAM-13)-3.94 units on a scale
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Patient Activation Measure 13 (PAM-13)-4.00 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Absenteeism

The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity. Absenteeism indicates the percentage of work time missed due to health problems.

Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype). Participants who were employed with available data at baseline and each time point are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): AbsenteeismEnd of Treatment-1.3 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 3.1
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Absenteeism12 weeks post treatment-15.4 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 37.4
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Absenteeism24 weeks post treatment-7.5 percent impairment
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): AbsenteeismEnd of Treatment-1.4 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 11
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Absenteeism12 weeks post treatment-3.8 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 29
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Absenteeism24 weeks post treatment-8.7 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 34.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Presenteeism

The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity. Presenteeism indicates the percentage of impairment while working due to health problems.

Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype). Participants who were employed with available data at baseline and each time point are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): PresenteeismEnd of Treatment-23.3 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 29.4
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Presenteeism12 weeks post treatment-16.7 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 30.1
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Presenteeism24 weeks post treatment-70.0 percent impairment
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): PresenteeismEnd of Treatment-8.5 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 27.1
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Presenteeism12 weeks post treatment-10.4 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 31.3
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Presenteeism24 weeks post treatment-9.3 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 21.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Activity Impairment

The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity. Total activity impairment (TAI) indicates the percentage of general (non-work) activity impairment due to health problems.

Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype) with available data at baseline and each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Activity ImpairmentEnd of Treatment-2.9 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 29.7
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Activity Impairment12 weeks post treatment-9.5 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 31
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Activity Impairment24 weeks post treatment-8.9 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 49.9
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Activity ImpairmentEnd of Treatment-10.4 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 33.7
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Activity Impairment12 weeks post treatment-10.5 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 36.6
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Activity Impairment24 weeks post treatment-11.5 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 37.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Work Productivity Impairment (TWP)

The WPAI Hepatitis C V2.0 is an HCV specific questionnaire used to measure work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and daily activity impairment. Respondents were asked about time missed from work and time while at work during which productivity was impaired in the past seven days. Results of WPAI are expressed as a percentage of impairment from 0 to 100, with higher percentages indicating greater impairment and less productivity. Total work productivity impairment (TWP) indicates the percentage of overall work impairment due to health problems.

Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen), and at 12 and 24 weeks after end of treatment

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype). Participants who were employed with available data at baseline and each time point are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Work Productivity Impairment (TWP)End of Treatment-18.5 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 30.5
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Work Productivity Impairment (TWP)12 weeks post treatment-17.0 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 30.6
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Work Productivity Impairment (TWP)24 weeks post treatment-72.3 percent impairment
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Work Productivity Impairment (TWP)End of Treatment-8.7 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 25.4
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Work Productivity Impairment (TWP)12 weeks post treatment-11.5 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 39.4
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Total Work Productivity Impairment (TWP)24 weeks post treatment-20.7 percent impairmentStandard Deviation 31.4
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Medications

Concomitant medication other than for chronic hepatitis C used from the time when the decision was made to initiate treatment with paritaprevir/ritonavir and ombitasvir with or without dasabuvir until after the last dose.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen

Population: Enrolled patients who received at least one dose of paritaprevir/ritonavir and ombitasvir with or without dasabuvir.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinNumber of Participants Who Received Concomitant Medications263 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, or Pregnancies

Time frame: From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose (16 or 28 weeks depending on the treatment regimen). The over all median (minimum, maximum) duration of treatment was 84 (28, 175) days.

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of paritaprevir/ritonavir and ombitasvir with or without dasabuvir.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, or PregnanciesPregnancies0 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, or PregnanciesSerious adverse events0 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, or PregnanciesAny adverse event0 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, or PregnanciesPregnancies0 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, or PregnanciesAny adverse event6 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, or PregnanciesSerious adverse events3 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, or PregnanciesSerious adverse events17 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, or PregnanciesAny adverse event82 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir With RBVNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, or PregnanciesPregnancies0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Comorbidities

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesAny comorbidity or coinfection335 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesAny coinfection9 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesCoinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV4 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesCoinfection with hepatitis B virus6 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Virological Response at End of Treatment

Virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL.

Time frame: End of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen)

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of Participants Achieving Virological Response at End of Treatment99.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Each Non-response Category 12 Weeks Post-treatment

SVR12 non-response was categorized according to the following: * On-treatment virologic failure (breakthrough \[at least one documented HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL during treatment\] or failure to suppress \[each measured on-treatment HCV RNA value ≥ 50 IU/mL\]); * Relapse, defined as HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL at EOT followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL post-treatment in patients who completed treatment (not more than 7 days shortened); * Death; * Premature treatment discontinuation with no on-treatment virological failure; * Missing SVR12 data and/or none of the above criteria.

Time frame: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of Participants in Each Non-response Category 12 Weeks Post-treatmentOn-treatment virologic failure0.2 percentage of participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of Participants in Each Non-response Category 12 Weeks Post-treatmentRelapse0.8 percentage of participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of Participants in Each Non-response Category 12 Weeks Post-treatmentDeath0.6 percentage of participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of Participants in Each Non-response Category 12 Weeks Post-treatmentPremature treatment discontinuation0.2 percentage of participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of Participants in Each Non-response Category 12 Weeks Post-treatmentNone of the above criteria0.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the Core Population With Sufficient Follow-up Data for SVR12 Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response 12 Weeks Post-treatment

Sustained virologic response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) levels less than 50 IU/mL 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. The core population with sufficient follow-up data regarding SVR12 included all core population participants who * had evaluable HCV RNA data ≥ 70 days after the last actual dose of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir and dasabuvir * or a HCV RNA value ≥ 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline * or had HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL at the last measurement post-baseline, but no HCV RNA measurement ≥ 70 days after the last actual dose of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir with dasabuvir due to reasons related to safety (e.g. dropped out due to adverse event) or virologic failure.

Time frame: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug (week 24 or 36 depending on the treatment regimen)

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype), and with sufficient follow-up data regarding SVR12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of Participants in the Core Population With Sufficient Follow-up Data for SVR12 Who Achieved Sustained Virological Response 12 Weeks Post-treatment98.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Breakthrough

Breakthrough was defined as at least one documented HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL during treatment.

Time frame: 12 or 24 weeks (depending on the treatment regimen)

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype) with virological response on-treatment and with at least one on-treatment measurement (including EOT) thereafter.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of Participants With Breakthrough0.00 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Relapse

Relapse was defined as participants with a virologic response (VR; HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL) at end of treatment (EOT) followed by HCV RNA ≥ 50 IU/mL at any time after the end of treatment.

Time frame: End of treatment (week 12 or 24 depending on the treatment regimen) and up to 24 weeks after the end of treatment.

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics, and with VR at EOT and who completed treatment, and had ≥ 1 HCV RNA measurement ≥ 70 days post-treatment and were a treatment failure between EOT and post-treatment day 70.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of Participants With Relapse0.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Ribavirin (RBV) Treatment Days in Relation to the Target Number of Ribavirin Treatment Days

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen.

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype), who were prescribed ribavirin.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of Ribavirin (RBV) Treatment Days in Relation to the Target Number of Ribavirin Treatment Days94.5 percentage of daysStandard Deviation 19.12
Secondary

Percentage of the Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of DAA

Adherence to study treatment was calculated as: Cumulative dose taken / (initial prescribed dose \* planned duration)

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen.

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype).

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of the Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of DAA> 105%6 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of the Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of DAA> 95% to ≤ 105%483 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of the Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of DAA> 80% to ≤ 95%28 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of the Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of DAA> 50% to ≤ 80%1 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of the Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of DAA≤ 50%1 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of the Ribavirin Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of Ribavirin

Adherence to study treatment was calculated as: Cumulative dose taken / (initial prescribed dose \* planned duration)

Time frame: From first dose of study drug to end of treatment, 12 to 24 weeks depending on the treatment regimen

Population: Enrolled participants who were adequately treated according to the standard of care and within local label recommendations for their specific disease characteristics (cirrhotic status, genotype), who were prescribed ribavirin, and with available data.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of the Ribavirin Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of Ribavirin> 105%6 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of the Ribavirin Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of Ribavirin> 95% to ≤ 105%349 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of the Ribavirin Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of Ribavirin> 80% to ≤ 95%39 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of the Ribavirin Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of Ribavirin> 50% to ≤ 80%22 Participants
Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RibavirinPercentage of the Ribavirin Dose Taken in Relation to the Target Dose of Ribavirin≤ 50%29 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026