HIV, Sexual Behaviour, Violence
Conditions
Brief summary
Female sex workers (FSWs) frequently experience violence from their intimate partners (non-paying lovers), which compromises their health and increases their the risk of infection with HIV or other sexually transmitted infections. Samdevena Plus is a complex multi-level intervention that works with FSWs, their intimate partners, the sex worker community and the general population. The intervention aims to reduce partner violence and increase consistent condom use within these relationships. The intervention consists of: (i) couples counselling sessions between FSWs and their intimate partners; (ii) separate group work among FSWs and intimate partners to increase self-esteem and encourage reflection about violence; (iii) strengthening supportive crisis management systems that address domestic and sex worker violence; (iv) training male 'champions' to encourage action against violence; and (v) training media to promote informed discussions about violence and HIV risk.The program involves changing perceptions on acceptability of physical violence as a form of discipline, challenging assumptions that give men authority over women, and working with men and women to encourage new relationship models based on equality and respect. The intervention will reach 800 FSWs and their intimate partners living in 47 villages in north Karnataka, India. The evaluation uses a cluster-randomized control trial design that introduces the intervention into half of villages for the first 24 months and the remaining half receive the intervention thereafter. The primary outcomes of the trial are: the proportion of FSWs who report: i) consistent condom use in their intimate relationship; and ii) experiencing partner violence within the past 6 months.
Detailed description
Female sex workers (FSWs) are at increased risk of HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STI) compared to women in the general population, and frequently experience violence in their working and domestic lives from a variety of perpetrators, which can enhance this risk. While progress has been made in addressing violence by police and clients, little work has been done to understand and prevent violence by intimate partners (IPs) among FSW populations. Samvedana Plus is a multi-level intervention programme that works with FSWs, their IPs, the sex worker community, and the general population, and aims to reduce violence and increase consistent condom use within these 'intimate' relationships. The programme involves shifting norms around the acceptability of beating as a form of discipline, challenging gender roles that give men authority over women, and working with men and women to encourage new relationship models based on gender equity and respect. The programme will aim to cover 800 FSWs and their IPs living in 47 villages in Bagalkot district, northern Karnataka. The study is designed to assess three primary outcomes: the proportion of FSWs who report: (i) any physical or sexual partner violence; (ii) severe/moderate physical or sexual partner violence in the last 6 months; and iii) consistent condom use in their intimate relationship. The evaluation will employ a cluster-randomised controlled trial design, with 50% of the village clusters (n=24) randomly selected to receive the intervention for the first 24 months and the remaining 50% (n=23) receiving the intervention thereafter. Statisticians will be blinded to treatment arm allocation. The evaluation will use an adjusted, individual-level intention to treat analysis, comparing outcomes in intervention and control villages at endline (24 months) using a mixed effects logistic model. We will adjust for confounders in two ways: i) outcome variables are adjusted for at a cluster level using the mean baseline summaries; ii) other variables will be adjusted for an at an individual level using endline data. We will include all women survey at endline. We will also report cluster-level summaries by trial arm for each primary and secondary outcome to double check our analyses. The evaluation design will involve quantitative and qualitative assessments with (i) all FSWs who report an IP (ii) IPs; and process/ implementation monitoring. This is an innovative intervention programme that aims to address violence by IPs as part of HIV prevention programming with FSWs. Reducing violence is expected to reduce vulnerability to HIV acquisition, and help women to work and live without fear of violence.
Interventions
At the individual level, the intervention will focus on: (i) structured reflection groups for FSWs to enhance self-esteem, encourage critical reflection around gender norms and violence, and build individual and collective efficacy; (ii) separate sessions for intimate partners to discuss issues around violence and condom use as well as gender, equity, respect and responsibility; (iii) skills building around female condoms (iv) access to individual and couples-based counselling. At the community level, the intervention will focus on: (i) strengthening the supportive crisis management systems so that they are able to address 'domestic' as well as 'work-place' violence among FSWs and (ii) building an environment that encourages action against violence from intimate partners by training male champions and developing folk media troops to generate discussion around gender, masculinity, violence and HIV risk behaviours.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Female Sex Workers who engage in commercial sex and who currently have an intimate partner or have had an intimate partner in the last 6 months, living in any of the 47 villages.
Exclusion criteria
* Female sex workers aged younger than 18 years, who do not have an intimate partner or have not had one in the last 6 months, or who live outside of the villages.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Intimate Partner Violence | 27 months after implementing the intervention | Proportion of FSWs who report experiencing any intimate partner violence in the last 6 months |
| Severe Intimate Partner Violence | 27 months after implementing the intervention | Proportion of sex workers experienced severe physical and/or sexual violence from intimate partners in the past 6 months |
| Condom Use | 27 months after implementing the intervention | Proportion of sex workers who report consistent condom use in their intimate relationship in the last 30 days |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Acceptance of Violence | 27 months after implementing the intervention | Change in the proportion of FSWs who report violent actions from intimate partners to be unacceptable |
| Changes in Solidarity Among FSWs Around Violence | 27 months after implementing the intervention | Change in proportion of FSWs who support their peers to reduce incidences of violence among FSWs |
| Change in Disclosure of Violence From Intimate Partners | 27 months after implementing the intervention | Change in proportion of FSWs who are willing to disclose incidences of violence by their intimate partner |
| Changes in Self-efficacy | 27 months after implementing the intervention | Proportion of FSWs who report ability to negotiate condom use and HIV/STI testing by their IP |
Countries
India
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Samvedana Plus Multi-level Intervention Multi-level intervention working with sex workers, their intimate partners and communities to reduce intimate partner violence (IPV) and increase condom use | 328 |
| Wait-list Control Wait list control. | 292 |
| Total | 620 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline (3 Months) | migration, refusal, not available | 77 | 112 |
| Endline (3 Months) | migration, refusal, not available | 35 | 87 |
| Midline (3 Months) | migration, refusal, not available | 30 | 34 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Samvedana Plus Multi-level Intervention | Wait-list Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 33.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 | 35.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 | 34.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3 |
| Cluster level mean of acceptance IPV from their intimate partners | 59.2 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.8 | 55.1 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.5 | 57.2 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.1 |
| Cluster level mean of any IPV (physical or sexual violence) in past 6 months | 31.4 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.4 | 45.0 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.6 | 38.0 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.2 |
| Cluster level mean of consistent condom use within the past 30 days | 38.9 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.7 | 46.0 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.2 | 42.4 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.8 |
| Cluster level mean of disclosure of IPV | 46.3 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.5 | 52.1 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.9 | 49.1 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.6 |
| Cluster level mean of knowledge of self-protection strategies against IPV | 6.2 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 | 7.0 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | 6.6 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 |
| Cluster level mean of self-efficacy to negotiate condom use with intimate partner | 19.9 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9 | 20.0 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.3 | 20.0 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.4 |
| Cluster level mean of severe IPV (physical and/or sexual violence) in the past 6 months | 23.7 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.1 | 33.8 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.9 | 28.6 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.8 |
| Cluster level mean of sex work population size | 17.2 Number of sex workers STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7 | 16.9 Number of sex workers STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8 | 17.0 Number of sex workers STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1 |
| Cluster level mean of solidarity around issues of IPV | 15.0 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 20 | 22.0 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.3 | 18.4 Mean percentage of participants STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.2 |
| Cluster level mean of village population size | 4121 Number of residents STANDARD_DEVIATION 2694.3 | 3755 Number of residents STANDARD_DEVIATION 2350.1 | 3942 Number of residents STANDARD_DEVIATION 2511 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment India | 328 Participants | 292 Participants | 620 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Female | 328 Participants | 292 Participants | 620 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 328 | 0 / 292 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 328 | 0 / 292 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 328 | 0 / 292 |
Outcome results
Condom Use
Proportion of sex workers who report consistent condom use in their intimate relationship in the last 30 days
Time frame: 27 months after implementing the intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Samvedana Plus Multi-level Intervention | Condom Use | 165 Participants |
| Wait List Control | Condom Use | 162 Participants |
Intimate Partner Violence
Proportion of FSWs who report experiencing any intimate partner violence in the last 6 months
Time frame: 27 months after implementing the intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Samvedana Plus Multi-level Intervention | Intimate Partner Violence | 26 Participants |
| Wait List Control | Intimate Partner Violence | 21 Participants |
Severe Intimate Partner Violence
Proportion of sex workers experienced severe physical and/or sexual violence from intimate partners in the past 6 months
Time frame: 27 months after implementing the intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Samvedana Plus Multi-level Intervention | Severe Intimate Partner Violence | 25 Participants |
| Wait List Control | Severe Intimate Partner Violence | 18 Participants |
Change in Disclosure of Violence From Intimate Partners
Change in proportion of FSWs who are willing to disclose incidences of violence by their intimate partner
Time frame: 27 months after implementing the intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Samvedana Plus Multi-level Intervention | Change in Disclosure of Violence From Intimate Partners | 21 Participants |
| Wait List Control | Change in Disclosure of Violence From Intimate Partners | 15 Participants |
Changes in Acceptance of Violence
Change in the proportion of FSWs who report violent actions from intimate partners to be unacceptable
Time frame: 27 months after implementing the intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Samvedana Plus Multi-level Intervention | Changes in Acceptance of Violence | 193 Participants |
| Wait List Control | Changes in Acceptance of Violence | 188 Participants |
Changes in Self-efficacy
Proportion of FSWs who report ability to negotiate condom use and HIV/STI testing by their IP
Time frame: 27 months after implementing the intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Samvedana Plus Multi-level Intervention | Changes in Self-efficacy | 170 Participants |
| Wait List Control | Changes in Self-efficacy | 163 Participants |
Changes in Solidarity Among FSWs Around Violence
Change in proportion of FSWs who support their peers to reduce incidences of violence among FSWs
Time frame: 27 months after implementing the intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Samvedana Plus Multi-level Intervention | Changes in Solidarity Among FSWs Around Violence | 112 Participants |
| Wait List Control | Changes in Solidarity Among FSWs Around Violence | 81 Participants |