Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate Steroid-free Treatment for Standard-Risk aGVHD (BMT CTN 1501)

A Randomized, Phase II, Multicenter, Open Label, Study Evaluating Sirolimus and Prednisone in Patients With Refined Minnesota Standard Risk, Ann Arbor 1/2 Confirmed Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (BMT CTN 1501)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02806947
Enrollment
127
Registered
2016-06-21
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2019-02-19
Last updated
2021-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute GVHD

Keywords

Acute GVHD, Standard-Risk, Sirolimus, Refined Minnesota Risk Criteria, Ann Arbor, Biomarker, Steroid-Free

Brief summary

The study is a Phase II randomized, open label, multicenter trial designed to identify whether sirolimus is a potential alternative to prednisone as an up-front treatment for patients with standard-risk acute GVHD defined according to clinical and biomarker-based risk stratification. This trial incorporates both a novel up front GVHD therapy (sirolimus) as well as a novel BMT CTN developed acute GVHD biomarker test.

Detailed description

The study is a Phase II randomized, open label, multicenter trial designed to identify whether sirolimus is a potential alternative to prednisone as an up-front treatment for patients with standard-risk acute GVHD defined according to clinical and biomarker-based risk stratification. Patients with previously untreated, standard-risk acute GVHD, according to the refined Minnesota Criteria, who are in need of systemic therapy, will have a 5 mL blood sample collected prior to randomization to assess their biomarker Ann Arbor Risk status. Ann Arbor scoring results will be provided 48-72 hours after randomization. Patients will begin their study treatment assignments within 24 hours of randomization. Those with biomarker results of combined AA1/2 risk will continue on their randomized study treatment and will be included for primary endpoint analysis (Day 28 complete or partial response) and all planned study procedures and assessments. In contrast, patients with AA3 biomarker risk and those patients with missing biomarker results may continue on their randomized therapies or start another therapy at their physicians' discretion. In addition, AA3 risk patients and those with missing results will not be considered in primary endpoint analysis, but will be included in a subset analysis.

Interventions

DRUGSirolimus

Sirolimus will be administered with a starting dose of 6 mg for patients older than 12 years, or 5 mg/m\^2 for patients ≤ 12 years. Trough levels will be routinely measured and sirolimus will be kept at maintenance dosing for target therapeutic levels for minimum duration through Day 56 post-randomization.

DRUGPrednisone

Prednisone will be administered at 2mg/kg/day x 3 days, and then tapered according to individual treating clinician judgment.

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network
CollaboratorNETWORK
National Marrow Donor Program
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical College of Wisconsin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with standard-risk acute GVHD, according to refined Minnesota Criteria. Refined Minnesota Criteria are available at https://redcap.ahc.umn.edu/surveys/?s=bNmFhseJIf. Standard-risk acute GVHD according to the refined Minnesota Risk Criteria requires meeting one of the criteria below: 1. Single organ involvement (Stage 1-3 skin, Stage 1 upper GI, or Stage 1-2 lower GI) 2. Multiple organ involvement (Stage 1-3 skin plus stage 1 upper GI, Stage 1-3 skin plus stage 1 lower GI, Stage 1-3 skin plus stage 1 lower GI plus stage 1 upper GI, Stage 1-3 skin plus stage 1-4 liver, or Stage 1 lower GI plus stage 1 upper GI) 2. Acute Minnesota Standard Risk GVHD requiring systemic immune suppressive therapy. 3. Acute GVHD developing after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation using either bone marrow, peripheral blood, or umbilical cord blood. Recipients of non-myeloablative, reduced intensity conditioning and myeloablative transplants are eligible. All allogeneic donor sources are permitted, including siblings, unrelated donors, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical related donors and umbilical cord blood. 4. Patients NOT receiving systemic immune suppressive therapy for treatment of active GVHD (topical skin and GI corticosteroids are allowed). 5. Ability to tolerate oral or enterically-administered medications. 6. Patients of all ages. 7. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than 500/µL. 8. Biopsy confirmation of GVHD is not required. Enrollment should not be delayed for biopsy or pathology results unless local institutional practice mandates biopsy confirmation to make a GVHD treatment decision. 9. Written informed consent and/or assent from patient, parent or guardian. 10. Collection of a 5 ml blood sample (red top for serum) from the patient for Ann Arbor Scoring and ready to be shipped immediately after randomization.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients receiving sirolimus (for any indication including GVHD prophylaxis) within 14 days of screening for enrollment. 2. Relapsed, progressing or persistent malignancy requiring withdrawal of systemic immune suppression. 3. Patients with acute GVHD developing after a donor lymphocyte infusion. 4. Active or recent (within 7 days) episode of transplant associated microangiopathy. 5. Patients with uncontrolled infections will be excluded. Infections are considered controlled if appropriate therapy has been instituted and, at the time of enrollment, no signs of progression are present. Progression of infection is defined as hemodynamic instability attributable to sepsis, new symptoms, worsening physical signs or radiographic findings attributable to infection. Persisting fever without other signs or symptoms will not be interpreted as progressing infection. 6. Patients unlikely to be available for evaluation at the transplant center on Day 28 and 56 of therapy. 7. A clinical presentation resembling de novo chronic GVHD or overlap syndrome developing before or present at the time of enrollment. 8. Patients receiving corticosteroids for any indication within 7 days before the onset of acute GVHD, except the following: Stable replacement doses of corticosteroids for adrenal insufficiency are permitted (e.g. hydrocortisone total dose of 10-12 mg/m\^2/day or prednisone 5-7.5mg daily or equivalent). Corticosteroids administered as premedication before transfusion of blood products or before intravenous medications to prevent infusion reactions are allowed. 9. Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding. 10. Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) or a man who has sexual contact with a FCBP and is unwilling to use effective birth control for the duration of the study. 11. Patients on dialysis. 12. Patients on mechanical ventilation. 13. Patients with severe hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome who in the judgment of the treating physician are not expected to have normalized bilirubin by Day 56 after enrollment. 14. Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to sirolimus or any component of the formulation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) to Acute GVHD TreatmentDays 28 and 56 Post-randomizationScoring of CR/PR is in comparison to the participant's acute GVHD status at randomization. Complete response (CR) is defined as staging of 0 for in all target organs for GVHD - skin, GI tract, and liver. Partial response (PR) is defined as improvement in some target organ(s) without worsening in others. Death and initiation of systemic acute GVHD treatment beyond randomized treatment are considered failures for this endpoint. Organ staging is defined below: Skin stage: 0: No rash 1. Rash \<25% of body surface area (BSA) 2. Rash on 25-50% of BSA 3. Rash on \>50% of BSA 4. Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation Liver stage (based on bilirubin level): 0: \<2 mg/dL 1. 2-3 mg/dL 2. 3.01-6 mg/dL 3. 6.01-15.0 mg/dL 4. \>15 mg/dL GI stage: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea \<500 mL/day 1. Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD 2. Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day 3. Diarrhea \>1500 mL/day 4. Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute GVHD ResponseDays 28 and 56 Post-randomizationAcute GVHD response is classified as CR, PR, mixed response (MR), no response (NR), and progression and scored by comparison to acute GVHD status at randomization. MR is defined as improvement in some organ(s) with worsening in another, progression as worsening in some organ(s) without improvement in others, and NR as absence of any improvement or worsening. Death and initiation of systemic acute GVHD treatment beyond randomized treatment are classified as NR. Organ staging is defined as: Skin stage: 0: No rash 1. Rash \<25% of body surface area (BSA) 2. Rash 25-50% of BSA 3. Rash \>50% of BSA 4. Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation Liver stage (based on bilirubin level in mg/dL): 0: \<2 1. 2-3 2. 3.01-6 3. 6.01-15.0 4. \>15 GI stage: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea \<500 mL/day 1. Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD 2. Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day 3. Diarrhea \>1500 mL/day 4. Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus
Percentage of Participants With Treatment FailureDays 28 and 56 Post-randomizationTreatment failure is defined as either no response (NR) or progression and scored by comparison to acute GVHD status at randomization. Progression is defined as worsening in some target organ(s) without improvement in others and NR is defined as absence of any improvement or worsening in target organs. Death and initiation of systemic acute GVHD treatment beyond randomized treatment are classified as NR. Organ staging is defined as: Skin stage: 0: No rash 1. Rash \<25% of body surface area (BSA) 2. Rash 25-50% of BSA 3. Rash \>50% of BSA 4. Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation Liver stage (based on bilirubin level in mg/dL): 0: \<2 1. 2-3 2. 3.01-6 3. 6.01-15.0 4. \>15 GI stage: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea \<500 mL/day 1. Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD 2. Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day 3. Diarrhea \>1500 mL/day 4. Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival6 and 12 Months Post-randomizationOverall survival is defined as survival of death from any cause.
Percentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival6 and 12 Months Post-randomizationDisease-free survival is defined as freedom from death and relapse of the underlying malignancy.
Proportion of Participants With Event-free Survival6 and 12 Months Post-randomizationEvent-free survival is defined as freedom from acute GVHD progression, chronic GVHD, malignancy relapse, and death.
Percentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) and Steroid Dose Less Than 0.25 mg/kg Per DayDay 28 Post-randomizationThe proportion of patients with CR/PR and on a prednisone-equivalent steroid dose of 0.25 mg/kg/day or less is evaluated. CR/PR scoring is in comparison to acute GVHD status at randomization. CR is defined as staging of 0 in all target organs. PR is defined as improvement in some organ(s) without worsening in others. Death and initiation of steroid-free, systemic acute GVHD treatment beyond randomized therapy are considered failures for this endpoint. Organ staging is defined as: Skin stage: 0: No rash 1. Rash \<25% of body surface area (BSA) 2. Rash 25-50% of BSA 3. Rash \>50% of BSA 4. Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation Liver stage (based on bilirubin level in mg/dL): 0: \<2 1. 2-3 2. 3.01-6 3. 6.01-15.0 4. \>15 mg/dL GI stage: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea \<500 mL/day 1. Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD 2. Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day 3. Diarrhea \>1500 mL/day 4. Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus
Percentage of Participants With Malignancy Relapse6 and 12 Months Post-randomizationThe cumulative incidence of relapse of the primary malignancy is described, with death treated as a competing risk.
Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD6 and 12 Months Post-randomizationChronic GVHD is classified per 2005 NIH Consensus Criteria (Filipovich et al. 2005) into categories of severity: none, mild, moderate, and severe. Occurrence of chronic GVHD is defined as the occurrence of mild, moderate, or severe chronic GVHD per this classification. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD is described, with death and malignancy relapse treated as competing risks.
Percentage of Participants With GVHD-free Survival6 and 12 Months Post-randomizationGVHD-free survival is defined as freedom from acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and death. The proportion of participants alive and free of both acute and chronic GVHD are described at 6 and 12 months post-randomization.
Percentage of Participants With Serious Infections6 and 12 Months Post-randomizationThe cumulative incidence of serious infections (Grade 2 or 3 per BMT CTN MOP) is described, with death treated as a competing risk.
Percentage of Participants With Non-relapse Mortality6 and 12 Months Post-randomizationNon-relapse mortality is defined as death due to any cause other than relapse of the underlying malignancy. The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality is described, with malignancy relapse treated as a competing risk.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The primary analysis population includes only participants with an AA score of 1 or 2 (n=64 on the prednisone arm, n=58 on the sirolimus arm). Three participants on the prednisone arm and two on the sirolimus arm were excluded because they had an AA score of 3 or missing.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sirolimus
Sirolimus, a steroid-free therapy, will be administered after a diagnosis of standard-risk aGVHD is clinically established. Sirolimus: Sirolimus will be administered with a starting dose of 6 mg for patients older than 12 years, or 5 mg/m\^2 for patients ≤ 12 years. Trough levels will be routinely measured and sirolimus will be kept at maintenance dosing for target therapeutic levels for minimum duration through Day 56 post-randomization.
58
Prednisone
Prednisone, standard of care therapy for GVHD, will be administered after a diagnosis of standard-risk aGVHD is clinically established. Prednisone: Prednisone will be administered at 2mg/kg/day x 3 days, and then tapered according to individual treating clinician judgment.
64
Total122

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject51

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSirolimusTotalPrednisone
Age, Continuous58.0 years54.6 years52.4 years
Ann Arbor Biomarker Risk Score
1
38 Participants83 Participants45 Participants
Ann Arbor Biomarker Risk Score
2
20 Participants39 Participants19 Participants
Liver Abnormalities at Enrollment
Bilirubin 2.0-3.0mg/dL
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Liver Abnormalities at Enrollment
Bilirubin <2.0mg/dL
58 Participants121 Participants63 Participants
Lower GI Abnormalities at Enrollment
Adult: 1000-1500mL/day, Child: 20-30mL/kg/day
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Lower GI Abnormalities at Enrollment
Adult: 500-999mL/day, Child: 10-19.9mL/kg/day
2 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Lower GI Abnormalities at Enrollment
Adult: <500 mL/day, Child: <10mL/kg/day
3 Participants13 Participants10 Participants
Lower GI Abnormalities at Enrollment
No Diarrhea
53 Participants99 Participants46 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian / Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiracial
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
55 Participants114 Participants59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants52 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
37 Participants70 Participants33 Participants
Skin Abnormalities at Enrollment
Maculopapular Rash 25-50% body surface area
14 Participants27 Participants13 Participants
Skin Abnormalities at Enrollment
Maculopapular Rash <25% body surface area
8 Participants19 Participants11 Participants
Skin Abnormalities at Enrollment
Maculopapular Rash >50% body surface area
16 Participants37 Participants21 Participants
Skin Abnormalities at Enrollment
No active GVHD rash
20 Participants39 Participants19 Participants
Upper GI Abnormalities at Enrollment
No or Intermittent Nausea, Vomiting, or Anorexia
32 Participants68 Participants36 Participants
Upper GI Abnormalities at Enrollment
Persistent Nausea, Vomiting, or Anorexia
26 Participants54 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
12 / 5817 / 64
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 580 / 64
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 583 / 64

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) to Acute GVHD Treatment

Scoring of CR/PR is in comparison to the participant's acute GVHD status at randomization. Complete response (CR) is defined as staging of 0 for in all target organs for GVHD - skin, GI tract, and liver. Partial response (PR) is defined as improvement in some target organ(s) without worsening in others. Death and initiation of systemic acute GVHD treatment beyond randomized treatment are considered failures for this endpoint. Organ staging is defined below: Skin stage: 0: No rash 1. Rash \<25% of body surface area (BSA) 2. Rash on 25-50% of BSA 3. Rash on \>50% of BSA 4. Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation Liver stage (based on bilirubin level): 0: \<2 mg/dL 1. 2-3 mg/dL 2. 3.01-6 mg/dL 3. 6.01-15.0 mg/dL 4. \>15 mg/dL GI stage: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea \<500 mL/day 1. Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD 2. Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day 3. Diarrhea \>1500 mL/day 4. Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus

Time frame: Days 28 and 56 Post-randomization

Population: CR/PR was evaluated in participants remaining on study until the assessment time point. At Day 28, one prednisone and four sirolimus arm participants were excluded from the analysis due to prior study withdrawal. At Day 56, one prednisone and five sirolimus arm participants were excluded from the analysis due to prior study withdrawal.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) to Acute GVHD TreatmentCR/PR at Day 28Yes35 Participants
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) to Acute GVHD TreatmentCR/PR at Day 28No19 Participants
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) to Acute GVHD TreatmentCR/PR at Day 56Yes34 Participants
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) to Acute GVHD TreatmentCR/PR at Day 56No19 Participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) to Acute GVHD TreatmentCR/PR at Day 56No13 Participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) to Acute GVHD TreatmentCR/PR at Day 28Yes46 Participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) to Acute GVHD TreatmentCR/PR at Day 56Yes50 Participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) to Acute GVHD TreatmentCR/PR at Day 28No17 Participants
Comparison: The primary objective of this Phase II trial was to describe the proportion of patients with Day 28 CR/PR in each treatment arm and to estimate the risk difference of these rates using a point estimate and 90% confidence interval. These estimates are used to inform about the efficacy of sirolimus in contrast to prednisone for potential future research.90% CI: [-0.223, 0.059]
Comparison: A secondary objective of this Phase II trial was to describe the proportion of patients with Day 56 CR/PR in each treatment arm and to estimate the risk difference of these rates using a point estimate and 95% confidence interval. These estimates are used to inform about the efficacy of sirolimus in contrast to prednisone for potential future research.95% CI: [-0.315, 0.011]
Secondary

Acute GVHD Response

Acute GVHD response is classified as CR, PR, mixed response (MR), no response (NR), and progression and scored by comparison to acute GVHD status at randomization. MR is defined as improvement in some organ(s) with worsening in another, progression as worsening in some organ(s) without improvement in others, and NR as absence of any improvement or worsening. Death and initiation of systemic acute GVHD treatment beyond randomized treatment are classified as NR. Organ staging is defined as: Skin stage: 0: No rash 1. Rash \<25% of body surface area (BSA) 2. Rash 25-50% of BSA 3. Rash \>50% of BSA 4. Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation Liver stage (based on bilirubin level in mg/dL): 0: \<2 1. 2-3 2. 3.01-6 3. 6.01-15.0 4. \>15 GI stage: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea \<500 mL/day 1. Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD 2. Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day 3. Diarrhea \>1500 mL/day 4. Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus

Time frame: Days 28 and 56 Post-randomization

Population: Acute GVHD response was evaluated in participants remaining on study until the assessment day. At Day 28, one prednisone and four sirolimus arm participants were excluded from the analysis due to prior study withdrawal. At Day 56, one prednisone and five sirolimus arm participants were excluded from the analysis due to prior study withdrawal.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SirolimusAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 28Complete Response (CR)30 Participants
SirolimusAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 28Partial Response (PR)5 Participants
SirolimusAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 28Mixed Response (MR)1 Participants
SirolimusAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 28No Response (NR)16 Participants
SirolimusAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 28Progression2 Participants
SirolimusAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 56Complete Response (CR)30 Participants
SirolimusAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 56Partial Response (PR)4 Participants
SirolimusAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 56Mixed Response (MR)0 Participants
SirolimusAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 56No Response (NR)19 Participants
SirolimusAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 56Progression0 Participants
PrednisoneAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 56Mixed Response (MR)0 Participants
PrednisoneAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 28Complete Response (CR)39 Participants
PrednisoneAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 56Complete Response (CR)48 Participants
PrednisoneAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 28Partial Response (PR)7 Participants
PrednisoneAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 56Progression3 Participants
PrednisoneAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 28Mixed Response (MR)5 Participants
PrednisoneAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 56Partial Response (PR)2 Participants
PrednisoneAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 28No Response (NR)11 Participants
PrednisoneAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 56No Response (NR)10 Participants
PrednisoneAcute GVHD ResponseAcute GVHD Response at Day 28Progression1 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in classification of acute GVHD response at Day 28 post-randomization between participants on the sirolimus and prednisone arms. These classifications were compared between treatment arms using Fisher's exact test, due to the presence of small numbers of participants in some categories.p-value: 0.32Fisher Exact
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in classification of acute GVHD response at Day 56 post-randomization between participants on the sirolimus and prednisone arms. These classifications were compared between treatment arms using Fisher's exact test, due to the presence of small numbers of participants in some categories.p-value: 0.014Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD

Chronic GVHD is classified per 2005 NIH Consensus Criteria (Filipovich et al. 2005) into categories of severity: none, mild, moderate, and severe. Occurrence of chronic GVHD is defined as the occurrence of mild, moderate, or severe chronic GVHD per this classification. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD is described, with death and malignancy relapse treated as competing risks.

Time frame: 6 and 12 Months Post-randomization

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Chronic GVHDChronic GVHD at 6 Months25.7 percentage of participants
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Chronic GVHDChronic GVHD at 12 Months31.4 percentage of participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Chronic GVHDChronic GVHD at 6 Months31.2 percentage of participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Chronic GVHDChronic GVHD at 12 Months40.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of participants with chronic GVHD between the sirolimus and prednisone arms during the 12 month period post-randomization, with death and malignancy relapse treated as competing risks for chronic GVHD. These proportions were compared between treatment arms using Gray's test.p-value: 0.296Gray's test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) and Steroid Dose Less Than 0.25 mg/kg Per Day

The proportion of patients with CR/PR and on a prednisone-equivalent steroid dose of 0.25 mg/kg/day or less is evaluated. CR/PR scoring is in comparison to acute GVHD status at randomization. CR is defined as staging of 0 in all target organs. PR is defined as improvement in some organ(s) without worsening in others. Death and initiation of steroid-free, systemic acute GVHD treatment beyond randomized therapy are considered failures for this endpoint. Organ staging is defined as: Skin stage: 0: No rash 1. Rash \<25% of body surface area (BSA) 2. Rash 25-50% of BSA 3. Rash \>50% of BSA 4. Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation Liver stage (based on bilirubin level in mg/dL): 0: \<2 1. 2-3 2. 3.01-6 3. 6.01-15.0 4. \>15 mg/dL GI stage: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea \<500 mL/day 1. Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD 2. Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day 3. Diarrhea \>1500 mL/day 4. Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus

Time frame: Day 28 Post-randomization

Population: The endpoint was evaluated only in participants that remained on study until Day 28. One participant on the prednisone arm and four on the sirolimus arm were deemed unevaluable at Day 28 due to prior study withdrawal.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) and Steroid Dose Less Than 0.25 mg/kg Per DayYes36 Participants
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) and Steroid Dose Less Than 0.25 mg/kg Per DayNo18 Participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) and Steroid Dose Less Than 0.25 mg/kg Per DayYes20 Participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (CR/PR) and Steroid Dose Less Than 0.25 mg/kg Per DayNo43 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of participants with CR/PR and steroid dose of 0.25mg/kg/day or less at Day 28 post-randomization between the sirolimus and prednisone arms. These proportions were compared between treatment arms using a Z test of the difference of binomial proportions.p-value: <0.001Z test comparing binomial proportions
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival

Disease-free survival is defined as freedom from death and relapse of the underlying malignancy.

Time frame: 6 and 12 Months Post-randomization

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Disease-free SurvivalDisease-free Survival at 6 Months72.8 percentage of participants
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Disease-free SurvivalDisease-free Survival at 12 Months61.6 percentage of participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Disease-free SurvivalDisease-free Survival at 6 Months78.1 percentage of participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Disease-free SurvivalDisease-free Survival at 12 Months70.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of participants with disease-free survival between the sirolimus and prednisone arms during the 12 month period post-randomization. These proportions were compared between treatment arms using a log rank test.p-value: 0.34Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With GVHD-free Survival

GVHD-free survival is defined as freedom from acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and death. The proportion of participants alive and free of both acute and chronic GVHD are described at 6 and 12 months post-randomization.

Time frame: 6 and 12 Months Post-randomization

Population: GVHD-free survival was evaluated only in participants that remained on study until the assessment time point. One participant on the prednisone arm and five on the sirolimus arm were excluded from the analysis at 6 and 12 months due to prior study withdrawal.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With GVHD-free SurvivalGVHD-free Survival at 6 Months45.3 percentage of participants
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With GVHD-free SurvivalGVHD-free Survival at 12 Months50.9 percentage of participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With GVHD-free SurvivalGVHD-free Survival at 6 Months46.0 percentage of participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With GVHD-free SurvivalGVHD-free Survival at 12 Months46.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of participants with GVHD-free survival at 6 months post-randomization between the sirolimus and prednisone arms. These proportions were compared between treatment arms using a Z test of the difference of binomial proportions.p-value: 0.936Z test comparing binomial proportions
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of participants with GVHD-free survival at 6 months post-randomization between the sirolimus and prednisone arms. These proportions were compared between treatment arms using a Z test of the difference of binomial proportions.p-value: 0.598Z test comparing binomial proportions
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Malignancy Relapse

The cumulative incidence of relapse of the primary malignancy is described, with death treated as a competing risk.

Time frame: 6 and 12 Months Post-randomization

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Malignancy RelapseMalignancy Relapse at 6 Months14.5 percentage of participants
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Malignancy RelapseMalignancy Relapse at 12 Months21.9 percentage of participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Malignancy RelapseMalignancy Relapse at 6 Months12.5 percentage of participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Malignancy RelapseMalignancy Relapse at 12 Months15.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of participants with malignancy relapse between the sirolimus and prednisone arms during the 12 month period post-randomization, with death treated as a competing risk for malignancy relapse. These proportions were compared between treatment arms using Gray's test.p-value: 0.402Gray's test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Non-relapse Mortality

Non-relapse mortality is defined as death due to any cause other than relapse of the underlying malignancy. The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality is described, with malignancy relapse treated as a competing risk.

Time frame: 6 and 12 Months Post-randomization

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Non-relapse MortalityNon-relapse Mortality at 6 Months12.7 percentage of participants
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Non-relapse MortalityNon-relapse Mortality at 12 Months16.5 percentage of participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Non-relapse MortalityNon-relapse Mortality at 6 Months9.4 percentage of participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Non-relapse MortalityNon-relapse Mortality at 12 Months14.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of participants with non-relapse mortality between the sirolimus and prednisone arms during the 12 month period post-randomization, with malignancy relapse treated as a competing risk for non-relapse mortality. These proportions were compared between treatment arms using Gray's test.p-value: 0.726Gray's test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as survival of death from any cause.

Time frame: 6 and 12 Months Post-randomization

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Overall SurvivalOverall Survival at 6 Months81.9 percentage of participants
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Overall SurvivalOverall Survival at 12 Months76.3 percentage of participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Overall SurvivalOverall Survival at 6 Months82.7 percentage of participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Overall SurvivalOverall Survival at 12 Months73.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of participants with overall survival between the sirolimus and prednisone arms during the 12 month period post-randomization. These proportions were compared between treatment arms using a log rank test.p-value: 0.785Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Serious Infections

The cumulative incidence of serious infections (Grade 2 or 3 per BMT CTN MOP) is described, with death treated as a competing risk.

Time frame: 6 and 12 Months Post-randomization

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Serious InfectionsSeirious Infections at 6 Months30.4 percentage of participants
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Serious InfectionsSeirious Infections at 12 Months39.6 percentage of participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Serious InfectionsSeirious Infections at 6 Months43.8 percentage of participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Serious InfectionsSeirious Infections at 12 Months51.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of participants with serious infections between the sirolimus and prednisone arms during the 12 month period post-randomization, with death treated as a competing risk for serious infection. These proportions were compared between treatment arms using Gray's test.p-value: 0.221Gray's test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure

Treatment failure is defined as either no response (NR) or progression and scored by comparison to acute GVHD status at randomization. Progression is defined as worsening in some target organ(s) without improvement in others and NR is defined as absence of any improvement or worsening in target organs. Death and initiation of systemic acute GVHD treatment beyond randomized treatment are classified as NR. Organ staging is defined as: Skin stage: 0: No rash 1. Rash \<25% of body surface area (BSA) 2. Rash 25-50% of BSA 3. Rash \>50% of BSA 4. Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation Liver stage (based on bilirubin level in mg/dL): 0: \<2 1. 2-3 2. 3.01-6 3. 6.01-15.0 4. \>15 GI stage: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea \<500 mL/day 1. Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD 2. Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day 3. Diarrhea \>1500 mL/day 4. Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus

Time frame: Days 28 and 56 Post-randomization

Population: Treatment failure was evaluated in participants remaining on study until the assessment day. At Day 28, one prednisone and four sirolimus arm participants were excluded from the analysis due to prior study withdrawal. At Day 56, one prednisone and five sirolimus arm participants were excluded from the analysis due to prior study withdrawal.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Treatment FailureTreatment Failure at Day 28Yes18 Participants
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Treatment FailureTreatment Failure at Day 28No36 Participants
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Treatment FailureTreatment Failure at Day 56Yes19 Participants
SirolimusPercentage of Participants With Treatment FailureTreatment Failure at Day 56No34 Participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Treatment FailureTreatment Failure at Day 56No50 Participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Treatment FailureTreatment Failure at Day 28Yes12 Participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Treatment FailureTreatment Failure at Day 56Yes13 Participants
PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Treatment FailureTreatment Failure at Day 28No51 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of participants with treatment failure at Day 28 post-randomization between the sirolimus and prednisone arms. These proportions were compared between treatment arms using a Z test of the difference of binomial proportions.p-value: 0.078Z test comparing binomial proportions
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of participants with treatment failure at Day 56 post-randomization between the sirolimus and prednisone arms. These proportions were compared between treatment arms using a Z test of the difference of binomial proportions.p-value: 0.068Z test comparing binomial proportions
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Event-free Survival

Event-free survival is defined as freedom from acute GVHD progression, chronic GVHD, malignancy relapse, and death.

Time frame: 6 and 12 Months Post-randomization

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SirolimusProportion of Participants With Event-free SurvivalEvent-free Survival at 6 Months47.3 percentage of participants
SirolimusProportion of Participants With Event-free SurvivalEvent-free Survival at 12 Months35.9 percentage of participants
PrednisoneProportion of Participants With Event-free SurvivalEvent-free Survival at 6 Months43.7 percentage of participants
PrednisoneProportion of Participants With Event-free SurvivalEvent-free Survival at 12 Months31.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportions of participants with event-free survival between the sirolimus and prednisone arms during the 12 month period post-randomization. These proportions were compared between treatment arms using a log rank test.p-value: 0.713Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026