Skip to content

Ultrasound Guided Axillary Venous Cannulation in Pediatrics

Real-time Ultrasound-guided Axillary Venous Catheterization in Pediatric Patients: Comparison With the Landmark Technique Subclavian Vein Catheterization

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02806401
Enrollment
132
Registered
2016-06-20
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
2017-08-31
Last updated
2018-09-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Cannulation

Brief summary

The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare landmark-subclavian venous access to ultrasound-guided axillary venous access when performed by pediatric anesthesiologists.

Detailed description

Objective: Subclavian vein catheterization may cause various complications. The investigators will compare the real-time ultrasound-guided axillary venous access vs. the landmark method- subclavian venous access in pediatric paticipants. (the needle insertion point of ultrasound-guided axillary venous is axillary vein. and the needle insertion point of landmark method is infraclavicular subclavian vein) Design: Prospective randomized study. Setting: Operating room of a tertiary medical center. Interventions: The investigators will compare the ultrasound-guided axillary vein cannulation (66 paticipants) vs. the landmark method (66 pa- ticipants).

Interventions

DEVICElandmark
DEVICEUS_Ax

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 7 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* surgery under general anesthesia require central venous catheterization

Exclusion criteria

* hematoma in central vein central vein anomaly catheterization site infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
2nd access success rateinterval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1st access success rateinterval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds
3rd access success rateinterval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds
total timeinterval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026