Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Cannulation
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare landmark-subclavian venous access to ultrasound-guided axillary venous access when performed by pediatric anesthesiologists.
Detailed description
Objective: Subclavian vein catheterization may cause various complications. The investigators will compare the real-time ultrasound-guided axillary venous access vs. the landmark method- subclavian venous access in pediatric paticipants. (the needle insertion point of ultrasound-guided axillary venous is axillary vein. and the needle insertion point of landmark method is infraclavicular subclavian vein) Design: Prospective randomized study. Setting: Operating room of a tertiary medical center. Interventions: The investigators will compare the ultrasound-guided axillary vein cannulation (66 paticipants) vs. the landmark method (66 pa- ticipants).
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* surgery under general anesthesia require central venous catheterization
Exclusion criteria
* hematoma in central vein central vein anomaly catheterization site infection
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 2nd access success rate | interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1st access success rate | interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds |
| 3rd access success rate | interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds |
| total time | interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after central line insertion, an expected average of 120 seconds |
Countries
South Korea