Skip to content

Single v Dual-Operator Ultrasound Technique for Peripheral Vascular Access in the Emergency Department

Single v Dual-Operator Ultrasound Technique for Peripheral Vascular Access in the Emergency Department

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02806180
Enrollment
128
Registered
2016-06-20
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2017-07-31
Last updated
2016-06-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients With Difficult Vascular Access.

Brief summary

This is a randomized controlled trial comparing the success of US guided peripheral IV placement between single vs dual-operator technique among a convenience sample of patients with moderate or difficult vascular access in a tertiary care Emergency Department.

Detailed description

Gaining intravenous (IV) access is a common and important procedure in the emergency department (ED). IV access is needed to deliver drugs, enable fluid resuscitation and sample blood, and delays in gaining access can lead to patient harm. Ultrasound (US) is a commonly used tool in the ED, and the utility of ultrasound in the placement of IVs in patients with difficult access has been well described. This study aims to further guide the use of this evidence based tool by ED Registered Nurses. The focus will be comparing single-operator technique, in which the same provider manipulates the ultrasound probe while simultaneously placing the IV, to a dual-operator technique whereby a second provider manipulates the probe. Any measured advantage has implications in guiding education and practice, as well as informing future ED policy.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDual Operator Ultrasound Guided IV placement

Second operator holds ultrasound probe.

PROCEDURESingle Operator Ultrasound Guided IV placement

Single operator holds ultrasound probe and places IV.

Sponsors

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult (18 years and older) patients predicted to require intravenous cannulas and identified at triage as having moderate or difficult access based on the following criteria: Moderate: peripheral vein is visible or palpable but difficulty is expected based on patient characteristics both clinical and historical. Difficult: No peripheral veins visible or palpable, or two failed attempts by traditional landmarking (LM).

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First Pass SuccessTotal procedure time (<15 minutes)The proportion of patients in whom vascular access is obtained on the first attempt with a single skin puncture.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall SuccessTotal procedure time (<15 minutes)The proportion of patients in whom vascular access is achieved within a maximum of three attempts at US guided placement.
Number of AttemptsTotal procedure time (<15 minutes)Total number of individual skin punctures that a patient receives.
Time to CanulationTotal procedure time (<15 minutes)Measured as the time from when the Registered Nurse operator first picks up the ultrasound probe to the time when 'flashback' is seen to confirm placement.
Patient Pain ScoreTotal procedure time (<15 minutes)To be completed by the patient immediately after the procedure: 10cm visual analogue scale from 'painless' to 'very painful'.
Operator Ease of Use ScoreTotal procedure time (<15 minutes)To be completed by the Registered Nurse operator immediately after the procedure: 10cm visual analogue scale from 'very easy' to 'very difficult'.

Contacts

Primary ContactCraig Brick, MD
craig.brick@mail.utoronto.ca6473281755
Backup ContactJordan Chenkin, MD, FRCPC
jordan.chenkin@utoronto.ca416-480-6100

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026