Root Perforation at the Bifurcation Area
Conditions
Brief summary
This is a study aimed to compare two materials: (1) Biodentine and (2) MTA. These two materials are going to be tested in sealing accidental root perforations at the bifurcation areas. The study is going to be conducted as a randomized controlled trial.
Interventions
DRUGBiodentine
Biodentine is going to be used as the sealing agent for the perforation.
DRUGMTA
MTA is going to be used as the sealing agent for the perforation.
Sponsors
Damascus University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. vital molars (upper or lower ) 2. suffered from perforation in the bifurcation area of the roots through a process of open access cavity, taking into account the location and size of perforation 3. Perforation should not exceed the size of 3 mm 4. Perforation and must also take into account the time of perforation.
Exclusion criteria
1. If the molar not vital. 2. If the perforation not in bifurcation root or extended inside the canals. 3. Size of perforation larger than 3 mm. 4. A long time ago on the occurrence of perforation with resorption in tooth structure.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Success at 3 months following root sealing | The success of treatment is assessed at three months following the application of the material | Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of the tooth are sound 100%. |
| Success at 6 months following root sealing | The success of treatment is assessed at 6 months following the application of the material | Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of the tooth are sound 100%. |
| Success at 9 months following root sealing | The success of treatment is assessed at 9 months following the application of the material | Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of the tooth are sound 100%. |
| Success at 12 months following root sealing | The success of treatment is assessed at 12 months following the application of the material | Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of the tooth are sound 100%. |
| Success at 18 months following root sealing | The success of treatment is assessed at 18 months following the application of the material | Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of the tooth are sound 100%. |
| Success at 24 months following root sealing | The success of treatment is assessed at 24 months following the application of the material | Case is considered successful if clinical and radiographic examinations of the tooth are sound 100%. |
Countries
Syria
Outcome results
None listed