Skip to content

Videothoracoscopic (VATS) vs. Robotic Approach for Lobectomy or Anatomical Segmentectomy

Prospective, Randomized, Multicentric Study On Videothoracoscopic (Vats) Vs Robotic Approach For Lobectomy Or Anatomical Segmentectomy In Patients Affected By Early Lung Cancer (ROMAN)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02804893
Acronym
ROMAN
Enrollment
300
Registered
2016-06-17
Start date
2017-03-06
Completion date
2023-03-06
Last updated
2018-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer

Keywords

Lung cancer, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Brief summary

This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study on 300 patients (150 VATS lobectomies and 150 robotic lobectomies) affected by early stage (I-II) lung cancer. The expected recruitment is one year and two year follow up. Surgeons should have a minimum of 30 major lung resections performed using one of the two techniques for participation in the study. Each participating centers should have the possibility to offer both techniques (Robotics and Vats). The primary end point is a combination of conversion and complication rate. The presence of at least one of the two events is considered a failure. Considering the rate of failure of 35% in the VATS arm, we want to see a failure rate not over 20% in the robot arm, so with a power of 80% and an alpha error of 5%, we need a total of 300 patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREVATS

Thorax thoracoscopic surgery (lobectomy)

PROCEDURERATS

Thorax robotic surgery (lobectomy)

Sponsors

Fondazione Umberto Veronesi
CollaboratorOTHER
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age older than 18 years old * Known or suspected lung cancers * Patients in clinical stage T1-T2, N0-N1 candidate to surgery lobectomy or anatomical segmentectomy * ASA-1-2-3

Exclusion criteria

* Clinical stage \>II * Severe heart disease * Alcohol abuse * Renal impairment (creatinine \>2.5) * Presence of serious comorbidities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intraoperative complications: conversion rate, defined as procedures that start with minimally invasive access and are converted to open surgery due to different reasons (bleeding, anatomical reasons, oncological reasons, technical reasons, other)date of Surgery
Postoperative complications: surgical complications, higher or equal grade II assessed by Clavien-Dindo scale, within 90 dayswithin 90 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients who undergo complete resection during the proceduredate of Surgery
Postoperative hospital stay2 weeks
Postoperative pain: daily evaluation with visual numeric scale before and after surgery until discharge2 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Quality of life by EORTC QOL-C302 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Duration of surgerydate of Surgery
Postoperative respiratory function: FEV 1, PEF and CV6 month postoperatively
Rate of local and distant recurrence and disease free survival24 months
Patient's immune response: analysis of PCR, serum interleukins, lymphocytes subpopulationsbefore surgery, 2 hours after surgery and at 3rd and 14th postoperative day
Duration of analgesic use after discharge and time to return to normal daily activitywithin 90 days
Number of resected lymph nodes and upstagingdate of Surgery

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026