Skip to content

A Comparison of Three Different Entry Points to Establish the Pneumoperitoneum

A Comparison of Three Different Puncture Points to Establish the Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02804529
Enrollment
90
Registered
2016-06-17
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2018-09-30
Last updated
2018-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopic Entry Technique

Keywords

Laparoscopic entry, Meng's point, Veress needle

Brief summary

The Palmer's point and periumbilical region are the common laparoscopic entry site to establish the pneumoperitoneum. In the present study, the investigators assess the safety and feasibility of Meng's point as a new laparoscopic entry site in cases to perform the gastrointestinal surgery. This prospective and randomized study will compare the three entry techniques with regard to: * Complications related to the entry technique * Time taken to enter the abdomen. * The number of attempts taken to enter the abdomen

Detailed description

Patients of China-Japan Friendship Hospital that are having a laparoscopic surgery for general surgery purposes will participate in the study. Patients with previous abdominal surgeries will be excluded from the study. A patient information sheet will be provided and written consent will be obtained. Patients who give written consent will be randomized into the three arms of the trial. All patient information will be confidential and only be available to researches involved in the study. Only one attending surgeon of the General Surgery Department of China-Japan Friendship Hospital will participate in the study. 90 patients will be recruited over one year period and the data will be analysed by a statistician.

Interventions

Sponsors

China-Japan Friendship Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any patient suitable for laparoscopic abdominal surgery

Exclusion criteria

* previous abdominal surgeries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Complications during entry in laparoscopyDuring surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time to enter in the abdominal cavityDuring surgery

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactFangqiang Meng, MD,CSCRS
mengfq75@163.com861084206168
Backup ContactChunmao Wang, MD.,PhD.
bjchest@163.com861084206168

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026