Endotracheal Intubation
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of the study was to compare the intubation time and effectiveness, the grade of larynx visibility, and the ease of intubation in adults performed by nurses using 4 devices: a Macintosh blade laryngoscope (MAC), and a TruView EVO2 (EVO2), TruView EVO2 PCD (PCD), and ETView SL (ETView) laryngoscope, in simulated CPR settings with and without CC.
Interventions
intubation with standard macintosh larygoscope; gold standard
A TruView EVO2 laryngoscope with blade size 3 (EVO2; Truphatek Holdings, Ltd., Netanya, Israel),
A TruView EVO2 PCD laryngoscope with blade size 3 (PCD; Truphatek Interbational Ltd., Netanya, Israel),
An ETView SL (ETView; ETViewLtd, Misgav, Israel) ednotracheal tube
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* had not received any training in endotracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopy before the study, * had nursing specialization in anaesthesiology or emergency medicine, * presented with no wrist or low back diseases or pregnancy.
Exclusion criteria
* not meet the above criteria.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| time to the first ventilation attempt | 1 day |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ease of intubation technique | 1 day | 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) was used, where 1 indicated an extremely simple procedure, while 10 - an extremely difficult one |
| time to visualize the larynx | 1 day | — |
| time to introduce the endotracheal tube through the vocal cords | 1 day | — |
| success rate | 1 day | first intubation attempt success rate |
| degree of larynx visibility | 1 day | analysed based on a Cormack-Lehane scale |
Countries
Poland