Skip to content

Longitudinal Evaluation of Intestinal, Haematological and Urinary Toxicity From Pelvic Irradiation for Prostate Cancer

Longitudinal Evaluation of Intestinal, Haematological and Urinary Toxicity From Pelvic Irradiation for Prostate Cancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02803086
Acronym
IHU-WPRT-TOX
Enrollment
700
Registered
2016-06-16
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2023-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Prostate cancer, Radiotherapy, Hematopoietic stem cells, Radiotoxicity

Brief summary

The prophylactic irradiation of pelvic lymph-nodes by means of Whole-Pelvis Radiotherapy (WPRT) in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) is aimed at the timely eradication of microscopic lymph-nodal metastases. Nevertheless, even though delivered by means of modern Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques, WPRT may result in intestinal, hematologic and urinary toxicity (IT, HT, UT, respectively) severely affecting patients' daily health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) within the so-called and inadequately investigated Pelvic Radiation Disease. The aim of this study is to develop sophisticated predictive models of IMRT-WPRT induced patient-reported HT, IT and UT in PCa. The possible correlation between several clinical factors and radiation doses received by various pelvic structures (i.e. pelvic bones subvolumes, intestinal loops, sigmoid, rectum and bladder) and risk and severity of patient-reported IT, UT and HT will be analyzed and robust multi-variable models will be developed and internally validated. A secondary end-point will be the identification of specific symptoms affecting patients' HRQoL during irradiation and in the long term, overall and in different therapeutic settings (radical, adjuvant and salvage). Lastly, possible correlation between HT and UT/IT will be investigated.

Detailed description

Experimental Design: Hypothesis. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of bowel, sigmoid colon and rectum are expected to be predictive of IT prospectively self-assessed by patients by means of IBDQ (Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire). Similarly, DVHs of pelvic bony subvolumes (lumbar-sacral, iliac and the lower pelvis) should predict HT, while DVHs and dose-surface histograms (DSHs) of the bladder are expected to be predictive of UT self-assessed by patients by means of IPSS (International Prostate Symptoms Score) and ICIQ-SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire- short form) questionnaires. Moreover, some specific urinary and intestinal-rectal symptoms are expected to lead to impairment in emotional, social and systemic domains, as assessed by the IBDQ questionnaire, more than others, with several possible clusters of symptoms prevailing in different treatment settings. Finally, the intestinal, urinary and hematologic toxicity profile of WPRT IMRT could emerge to be extremely different in patients treated with radical (RAD), adjuvant (ADV) or salvage (SALV) intent. Task1. The principal aim of the project is to develop sophisticated quantitative predictive models of IT, UT and HT (without the confounding bias of chemotherapy) from WPRT IMRT in both radical and postoperative treatment of localized PCa. The possible correlation between the radiation doses received by different pelvic structures and different toxicities will be analyzed. Task2. To try to individuate the intestinal/rectal and urinary symptoms most negatively affecting the Emotional, Social and Systemic patient domains, with the ultimate objective of focusing the quantitative predictive models including both clinical and physico-dosimetric parameters only upon these main symptoms. This approach could theoretically permit the creation of a shortened and radiotherapy adapted version of the IBDQ questionnaire. Task3. A thorough assessment of the different self-assessed toxicity profiles to be expected in patients treated with RAD, ADV or SALV intent will be carried out, with the ultimate aim of accumulating a set of extremely detailed information to be provided to patients in order to offer them appropriate counselling after the initial diagnosis of PCa with regard to the choice between radiotherapy vs surgery. In those selecting the latter and in the presence of risk factors at prostatectomy suggesting a possible role for postoperative radiotherapy, the ultimate objective would be that of assisting patients in the always extremely problematic choice between immediate adjuvant and timely, postponed, salvage irradiation in the case of biochemical recurrence. Task4. Secondary end-points: to search for a possible correlation between HT and IT/UT. Throughout the treatment period, patients will be seen every 2 weeks for toxicity monitoring. Subsequently, a follow-up visit will be performed at 3 months from the end of treatment, and every six months thereafter, up to 5 years. Intestinal and urinary toxicities, including urinary incontinence, will be self-assessed by patients by means of the Italian validated version of the IBDQ, IPSS and ICIQ-SF questionnaires: at baseline (no more than 30 days before RT start), at radiotherapy mid-point and end, at 3, 6,12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60 months from radiotherapy conclusion. A blood sample for white blood cells (WBC), with absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte counts (ANC and ALC, respectively), red blood cells (RBC) and platelets (PLT) counts will be collected at the same time intervals. In addition to the self-reported assessment of rectal/bowel and urinary symptoms during and after radiotherapy, an evaluation of acute and late IT and UT will be performed by the medical staff for possible future comparison between its subjective and objective measurement. IT, HT and UT will be graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
CollaboratorOTHER
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano
CollaboratorOTHER
Regina Elena Cancer Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine, Italy
CollaboratorOTHER
Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni
CollaboratorOTHER
Centro AKTIS Diagnostica e Terapia
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Sanitaria Locale To4
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Candiolo Cancer Institute - IRCCS
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Biella
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda U.S.L. della Valle d'Aosta
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata
CollaboratorOTHER
IRCCS San Raffaele
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with with an ECOG PS 0-1 * Patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate * WPRT can be delivered with both static and rotational IMRT techniques such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or Tomotherapy * Both conventionally (1.8-2 Gy/fraction) and moderately hypo-fractionated (≤ 2.7 Gy/fraction) regimens with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) approach are allowed; in any case the daily dose delivered to the pelvic nodes should be in the range of 1.8-2.0 Gy/fr

Exclusion criteria

* Patients older than 80 years at the time of enrollment * Missing written informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hematologic toxicity5 yearsif any, acute (\<within 90 days from radiotherapy completion) and late (\>90 days from radiotherapy completion) Grade 1, Grade 2 and Grade 3-4 leukopenia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, erythropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia and clinico-dosimetric factors predicting them;
Intestinal toxicity5 yearsa worsening of 2 points or more with respect to baseline of the 10 IBDQ items investigating the Bowel Domain (items # 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 20, 22, 24, 26 and 29, frequency of bowel movements, liquid defecation, abdominal cramps, abdominal pain, gas passage, abdominal bloating, rectal bleeding, urge to go to bathroom even if empty intestine, accidental soiling and nausea/feeling sick, respectively) and of the three cumulative items evaluating the impact of Bowel Symptoms on the Emotional, Social and Systemic Domains.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026