Cardiac Diseases, Coronary Disease, Hypertension
Conditions
Keywords
physical activity, patient feedback, risk perception, pedometer
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of a minimal intervention on risk perception of physical inactivity in patients with known coronary heart disease (CHD) and patients at risk for CHD. Therefore half of the patients (intervention group) get a personal feedback on their individual level of physical activity measured by pedometers and self-report questionnaires plus information about the risk factor 'physical inactivity' for heart diseases. Following the hypotheses the feedback should increase the patients risk perception of physical inactivity and furthermore increase physical activity.
Interventions
At cardiac consultation receive an individual feedback on their personal physical activity level.
Patients receive a pedometer two weeks prior to cardiac consultation.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Known coronary heart disease or at least 2 risk factors for coronary heart disease * Age: 18 years up to 75 years * Sufficient language skills * Access to a telephone * Willingness to participate in telephone interviews * Informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Life threatening health status * Severe somatic or/and psychological disorder that needs urgent treatment * Hospital stay within the last 7 days * Surgical intervention plus hospital stay for at least 3 days within the last 2 months * Myocardial infarction within the last 3 month * Musculoskeletal diseases, which have a strong influence on physical activity * Severe cognitive or/and visual difficulties
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Risk perception of physical activity level | Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up | time of measurement: one month after cardiac consultation |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Physical activity Level (Pedometer, time spent sitting, IPAQ) | Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up | time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation |
| Adherence to the pedometer | Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up | time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation |
| Satisfaction and acceptance of the feedback | Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up | time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation |
| Depression severity (PHQ-9) | Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up | time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation |
| Risk perception of physical activity level | Outcome measure is assessed at three months follow-up | time of measurement: three months after cardiac consultation |
| Somatic symptom severity (PHQ-15) | Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up | time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation |
| Quality of life (EQ-5D) | Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up | time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation |
| New York Heart Association Class | Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up | time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation |
| Canadian Cardiology Society Class | Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up | time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation |
| Anxiety severity (GAD-7) | Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up | time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation |
Countries
Germany