Skip to content

A Multicenter Prospective Registry for the Management of Degenerative Spine Disorders

DegenPRO: A Multicenter Prospective Registry for the Management of Degenerative Spine Disorders

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02802033
Enrollment
908
Registered
2016-06-16
Start date
2016-01-01
Completion date
2025-01-31
Last updated
2026-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Diseases, Spinal Cord

Keywords

Registry, Spine, Osteobiologics, Spinal Fusion

Brief summary

Details regarding the degenerative spine disorders will be collected with a specific focus on the use of osteobiologics in treating degenerative conditions and their impact on fusion, as well as patient-reported outcomes for these conditions.

Detailed description

The registry is designed to be open-ended. However, a statistical evaluation of the content und structure of database and CRFs in order to investigate the feasibility and quality of data collection is planned to take place prior to the registry expansion. Variables applicable to patients with a degenerative spine disorder which will be collected in the registry include: * Patient details * Symptoms * Diagnosis * Imaging assessment * Treatment details Feasibility phase: The statistical evaluation of the feasibility and quality of data collection will be performed after the first 5 sites have each enrolled 12 patients with a degenerative pathology and documented one follow-up visit. During this evaluation, enrolment of further patients can be continued. Based on the findings of this feasibility phase, adjustments to the existing database can be performed before the registry is rolled out on larger scale. Registry expansion: Following the evaluation process of the feasibility phase, the registry will be expanded to allow data entry in more sites globally. Multi-site participation of this registry will be rolled-out in stages, and will be offered to sites with appropriate expertise which are selected based on their potential (interest, resources and expected patient volume).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

AO Innovation Translation Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
AO Foundation, AO Spine
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient aged 18 years or older * Patient diagnosed with a degenerative spine disorder who receives treatment for the degenerative spine disorder * Patient capable of understanding the content of the patient information / Informed Consent Form * Patient willing and able to participate in the registry * Patient who has agreed to participate in the registry by providing consent according to the applicable local law and the declaration of Helsinki

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Use of Osteobiologics - Within the registry information on the use of osteobiologis (autografts, allografts, BMA/cells, BMP, DBM, matrices/carriers, platelets) are collectedEvery standard of care scheduled follow-up visit up to 3 yearsOsteobiologics are classified as autogenous bone graft substitutes, extenders, or enhancers. Types of osteobiologics include demineralized bone matrices (DBM), allografts and allograft formulations, synthetic bone grafts, bone morphogenic proteins, bone marrow aspirate systems, stem cells and platelet-rich plasma systems. The biologics are generally defined as being derived from or replicating natural substances. The osteobiologics are defined as such by possessing one or more of the following properties: osteoinductivity, osteoconductivity, and osteogenicity. Although biologics are classically defined as being derived from or replicating natural substances, a broader definition of an osteobiologic includes synthetic derivatives that may not replicate natural substances, but serve as a bone graft substitute, extender or enhancer. There is not yet defined how the data will be analysed. Data collected can help drive hypotheses and might help to answer unforeseen questions over time.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neck, Arm, Back, Leg, Thoracic pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)Every standard of care scheduled follow-up visit up to 3 years
Neck Disability Index (NDI)Every standard of care scheduled follow-up visit up to 3 years
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)Every standard of care scheduled follow-up visit up to 3 years
Euroqol EQ-5D-3LEvery standard of care scheduled follow-up visit up to 3 years
Short Form (SF)-36 V2Every standard of care scheduled follow-up visit up to 3 years
Modified Zung Depression IndexEvery standard of care scheduled follow-up visit up to 3 years
Distress and Risk Assessment Method (DRAM)Every standard of care scheduled follow-up visit up to 3 years
Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 QuestionnaireEvery standard of care scheduled follow-up visit up to 3 years
Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score (mJOA)Every standard of care scheduled follow-up visit up to 3 years
Type of fusion that was performed (posterior and/or anterior/interbody fusion)6 months after surgery, if this time point is collected as per standard of careData will be entered in the database but there is not yet defined how the data will be analysed. Data collected can help drive hypotheses and might help to answer unforeseen questions over time.
Fusion: Bridging trabecular bone across the segment, bone graft resorption, implant subsidence/migration, fatigue failure of spinal instrumentation, radioluciencies around screws, instability on flexion/extension views6 months after surgery, if this time point is collected as per standard of careRadiological source for interpretation (Clinical assessment, radiographs, CT, MRI, bone scan, other) Data will be entered in the database but there is not yet defined how the data will be analysed. Data collected can help drive hypotheses and might help to answer unforeseen questions over time.
Success of fusion6 months after surgery, if this time point is collected as per standard of careData will be entered in the database but there is not yet defined how the data will be analysed. Data collected can help drive hypotheses and might help to answer unforeseen questions over time.

Countries

Germany, Italy, United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORTim Yoon, MD

Principal Coordinating Investigator

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 14, 2026