Skip to content

Respiratory Muscle Training in L-Onset Pompe Disease (LOPD)

Respiratory Muscle Training in Late-Onset Pompe Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02801539
Enrollment
22
Registered
2016-06-16
Start date
2017-02-02
Completion date
2019-04-17
Last updated
2019-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glycogen Storage Disease Type II

Brief summary

This study is being done to test the effects of respiratory muscle training (RMT) in patients with late-onset Pompe Disease (LOPD) who have weakness of their breathing muscles. The results of this study will help design future research studies about RMT in LOPD. The goals of this study are to decide if sham-RMT is a useful control condition for RMT and to choose the best ways to measure the health benefits of RMT in LOPD.

Interventions

DEVICERMT therapy using modified RMT device

The exercises provided by the RMT device is intended to strengthen breathing muscles.

DEVICESham-RMT therapy using modified RMT device

The exercises provided by the Sham-RMT modified device is not intended to strengthen breathing muscles.

Sponsors

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
CollaboratorNIH
Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Diagnosis of LOPD * On enzyme replacement therapy for ≥ 26 weeks at pretest * Able to follow directions for study participation * Able to complete a home-based RMT regimen

Exclusion criteria

* Neurodegenerative conditions (e.g. stroke, dementia) or other serious neurologic condition that would prevent meaningful study participation as determined at the discretion of the principle investigator * Inability to give legally effective consent * Inability to read and understand English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in respiratory strengthbaseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, 9 monthsRMT to sham-RMT comparison of maximum inspiratory pressures (MIP). Change pretest to posttest is primary measure (baseline to 12 weeks).
Feasibility of sham-RMT, as measured by program adherence12 weeksAs measured by program adherence (good is considered greater than or equal to 80%). Helps determines if a future efficacy trial is warranted and if sham-RMT may be a good control condition for a future trial.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Gait, Stairs, Gower, and Chair (GSGC) scalebaseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, 9 monthsChange pretest to posttest
Change in peak cough flow (PCF)baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, 9 monthsChange pretest to posttest
Change in maximum expiratory pressures (MEP)baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, 9 monthsChange pretest to posttest
Change in diaphragm thicknessbaseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, 9 monthschange pretest to posttest
Change in Rasch-built Pompe-specific Activity Score (R-PAct)baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, 9 monthsChange pretest to posttest
Change in 6-minute walk test (6MWT)baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, 9 monthsChange pretest to posttest

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026