Skip to content

Locally Delivered Atorvastatin & Rosuvastatin for Treatment of Furcation Defects in Chronic Periodontitis

Comparative Evaluation of Locally Delivered 1.2% Atorvastatin and 1.2% Rosuvastatin Gel in Treatment of Mandibular Degree ii Furcation Defects in Chronic Periodontitis Subjects: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02800902
Enrollment
90
Registered
2016-06-15
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2016-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Periodontitis

Brief summary

Statins are one of the lipid lowering drugs that help in reducing cholesterol levels in the body by specifically inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase; which is a rate limiting enzyme for cholesterol synthesis. Rosuvastatin (RSV) and atorvastatin (ATV) have shown to have bone stimulatory and anti-inflammatory effects.. The present study aims to explore the efficacy of 1.2% RSV and 1.2% ATV gel as a local drug delivery and redelivery system as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) for the treatment of degree II furcation defects.

Detailed description

Statins are one of the lipid lowering drugs that help in reducing cholesterol levels in the body by specifically inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase; which is a rate limiting enzyme for cholesterol synthesis. Rosuvastatin (RSV) and atorvastatin (ATV) have shown to have bone stimulatory and anti-inflammatory effects.. The present study aims to explore the efficacy of 1.2% RSV and 1.2% ATV gel as a local drug delivery and redelivery system as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) for the treatment of degree II furcation defects. Methods: Ninety patients with mandibular buccal class II furcation defects were randomly allocated into three treatment groups: SRP plus placebo gel (group 1), SRP plus 1.2% RSV gel (group 2) and 1.2% ATV gel (group3). Clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at baseline then after 6 months. The gels were redelivered at the respective sites at this 6 month appointment. Then again all clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded after 3 months. (9 months from baseline)

Interventions

DRUGplacebo

Oral prophylaxis followed by placement of placebo gel

DRUGRosuvastatin

Oral prophylaxis followed by placement of rosuvastatin gel

DRUGAtorvastatin

Oral prophylaxis followed by placement of atorvastatin gel

Sponsors

Government Dental College and Research Institute, Bangalore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Systemically healthy patients with mandibular class II furcation defects and asymptomatic endodontically vital mandibular molars with radiolucency in furcation area with PD ≥ 5mm and horizontal PD ≥ 3mm and with no history of antibiotic or any periodontal therapy in past 6 months were included in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with any known systemic disease, allergic to statins, on systemic statin therapy, alcoholics, tobacco users, pregnant or lactating women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Bone defect fillbaseline, 6 & 9 monthsAssessed in percentage

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in modified sulcus bleeding indexbaseline, 6 & 9 monthsscale 0-3
Change in Plaque indexbaseline, 6 & 9 monthsscale 0-3
Change in pocket probing depthbaseline, 6 & 9 monthsmeasured in mm
Change in relative vertical clinical attachment levelbaseline, 6 & 9 monthsmeasured in mm
Change in relative horizontal clinical attachment levelbaseline, 6 & 9 monthsmeasured in mm

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026