Skip to content

Ventilation Using a Bag Valve Mask With Supplemental External Handle

Single Rescuer Ventilation Using a Bag Valve Mask With Supplemental External Handle Versus Standard Bag Valve Mask in a Manikin Model: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02800213
Enrollment
70
Registered
2016-06-15
Start date
2016-05-31
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2017-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Apnea

Brief summary

Investigators compared tidal volumes for single rescuer ventilation using a modified bag valve mask with a supplemental external handle versus a conventional bag valve mask in a manikin model.

Detailed description

This was a prospective, randomized, crossover study to assess the tidal volume delivered using a standard and modified bag valve mask (BVM) device in a manikin airway model. The modified device comprised a standard bag valve mask with supplemental external bar. Data was collected during May 2016 at the San Antonio Military Medical Center. Emergency medicine providers (physicians, physician assistants, residents, nurses, medics) were randomized to device order. Prior to participation each participant filled out a survey indicating their job status, gender, years of medical experience, and experience level with BVM ventilation. Hand grip strength and size (length, width, span) were measured. Each participant was then asked to provide BVM ventilation using the assigned devices at a rate of 10 breaths per minute for 3 minutes for a total of 30 breaths. Tidal volume of each delivered breath was recorded in milliliters. After a 3 minute rest period, testing was repeated with the second device. After ventilation with each device, participants completed an anonymous questionnaire that used a Likert scale to assess perceived qualities of the modified device including ease of use, ability to provide a superior mask seal, willingness to use in an emergency situation, and overall preference between the two devices. Each participant served as his/her own control.

Interventions

Subjects deliver breaths to manikin (IngMar RespiTrainer manikin model) a modified Ambu Spur II bag valve mask with a supplemental external handle

Subjects deliver breaths to manikin (IngMar RespiTrainer manikin model) a conventional Ambu Spur II bag valve mask

Sponsors

Brooke Army Medical Center
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Emergency Department healthy volunteers (physician assistants, residents, paramedics, nurses, medics, respiratory therapists).

Exclusion criteria

* Not trained in basic life support

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Received Tidal Volume3 minutesMean received tidal volume for 30 breaths delivered by the subjects over three minutes as measured via the RespiTrainer Advance manikin model monitor output.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Modified Then Conventional Ambu Spur II Bag Valve Mask
A health volunteer uses a modified Ambu Spur II bag valve mask with integrated internal handle (experimental device, not yet FDA approved) to deliver 10 breaths per minute for 3 minutes to a manikin (IngMar RespiTrainer manikin model). Modified Ambu Spur II bag valve mask: Subjects deliver breaths to manikin (IngMar RespiTrainer manikin model) a modified Ambu Spur II bag valve mask with a supplemental external handle. After completion, subjects repeat all these procedures using a conventional Ambu Spur II bag valve mask.
35
Conventional Then Modified Ambu Spur II Bag Valve Mask
A health volunteer uses a conventional Ambu Spur II bag valve mask to deliver 10 breaths per minute for 3 minutes to a manikin (IngMar RespiTrainer manikin model). Conventional Ambu Spur II bag valve mask: Subjects deliver breaths to manikin (IngMar RespiTrainer manikin model) a conventional Ambu Spur II bag valve mask. After completion, subjects repeat all these procedures using the modified Ambu Spur II bag valve mask.
35
Total70

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicModified Then Conventional Ambu Spur II Bag Valve MaskConventional Then Modified Ambu Spur II Bag Valve MaskTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
35 Participants35 Participants70 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
35 participants35 participants70 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants16 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants19 Participants38 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 700 / 70
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 700 / 70

Outcome results

Primary

Received Tidal Volume

Mean received tidal volume for 30 breaths delivered by the subjects over three minutes as measured via the RespiTrainer Advance manikin model monitor output.

Time frame: 3 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Modified Ambu Spur II Bag Valve MaskReceived Tidal Volume662 milliliters
Conventional Bag Valve MaskReceived Tidal Volume681 milliliters
p-value: 0.28t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026