Skip to content

Positive Appraisal Improve Trust Between Patients and Therapists, and Change Treatment Effects

Positive Appraisal Improve Trust Between Patients and Therapists, and Change Treatment Effects

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02799628
Enrollment
32
Registered
2016-06-15
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2018-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain, Trust

Keywords

Trust, Low Back Pain, Treatment Outcome

Brief summary

The trust between patients and medical providers is the cornerstone to obtain success treatment. To boost the trust can increase medical prescription compliance, enhance patient satisfaction, and improve the effectiveness of treatment. Otherwise, mistrust between medical providers and patients will result in ineffective treatment and excessive defensive health care. This situation may cause medical dispute and medical resources wasting problems. Most of treatment complete in a few times of admissions and interventions. So, how to improve the trust between patients and doctors quickly became a more knotty problem. Several studies found that speech (including listening, showing compassion, and take longer to explain), reputation, clothing, offer a newer therapy were more important than age, title, and sex. However, past researches were restricted to an unclear causal relationship. That is they can't be determined whether good doctor-patient relationship and better trust conditions create a longer visit time, better satisfaction, and good reputation, or vice versa. They also unable to clarify whether the high degree of trust result in improved treatment effects, or good relationship result from good medical outcomes. Investigators want to design a randomized control trial by giving patients recommendation and physical therapist introductions to enhance the trust of patients to therapists. And this study may verify whether enhance trust between therapists and patients will lead to changes in treatment effectiveness.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALintervention

intervention with recommendation and therapist introduction

OTHERplacebo

low back pain education, and physical therapy 3 times per week

Sponsors

Taoyuan General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. First time visit to Taoyuan general hospital rehabilitation ward at 2016/07/01\ 2017/12/31 2. Diagnosis with L spine spondylosis, L spine Herniated Inter-vertebral Disc, or non-acute low back muscle strain 3. Suitable for physical therapy with ( Hot packing + interference current therapy + pelvic traction + therapeutic exercise ) 4. most pain score \>2

Exclusion criteria

1. poor of follow oral order, or patients who can't understand Chinese, including patients with aphasia or dementia 2. patient who can not received 4 weeks of physical therapy 3. other cause of low back pain which can't treatment with physical therapy, including : (Urinary tract stones, infection, rapid progression disease which need immediately operation)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trust score by The Chinese version of the WFPTS(C-WFPTS) between intervention group and placebo groupThe first time data collection for individual 5 mins after the intervention.
Success treatment proportion between intervention group and placebo group 4 weeks after interventiondata collection for individual at the 0 and 4th week after clinical visitSuccess treatment is defined as the most pain score decrease from baseline more than 2 degree. ( Pain score change from baseline by Visual Analogue Scale after 4 weeks)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trust score by The Chinese version of the WFPTS(C-WFPTS) between intervention group and placebo groupThe second time and third time data collection after 2 weeks and 4 weeks after first clinical visit
Change of pain score with The Chinese version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-C) between intervention group and placebo groupdata collection for individual at the0, 2nd and 4th week after clinical visitPain score change from baseline
Change of the compression force to trigger the tenderness point from baselinedata collection for individual at the 0, 2nd and 4th week after clinical visitThe compression force was measured by IMADA digital force gauge (kgf) In each data collection point(0 , 2nd and 4th week) , we arrange 3 times test and use the average as the measure value.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026