Skip to content

Balanced Salt Solution Versus 0.9% Saline Infusion for Prevention of Contrast-induced Acute Kidney Injury (BASIC Trial)

A Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, 2 Parallel Groups, Multicenter, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Balanced Salt Solution Versus 0.9% Saline in Patients With High Risk of Contrast Induced Nephropathy.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02799368
Enrollment
493
Registered
2016-06-14
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2020-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Kidney Injury, Contrast Media Reaction, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Brief summary

As iodinate contrast media (CM) has been widely used in current medical practice, contrast induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) has been an important issue. Previously, many guidelines suggested prophylaxis protocol using 0.9% saline when CM is administrated to high risk patients. However, recent studies showed that 0.9% saline might induce metabolic acidosis due to its supra-physiologic chloride component, and therefore renal vasoconstriction. In spite of protective effect by volume expansion with saline infusion, this renal vasoconstriction might have conflicting effect on renal function, as hypoxic injury is suspected to be the main cause of CI-AKI. In contrast to 0.9% saline, balanced salt solution has physiologic level of chloride and neutral pH. Also, recent studies proved preventive effect of balanced salt solution for AKI in several clinical settings. Hence, the investigators planned a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing 0.9% saline and balanced salt solution to prevent CI-AKI.

Detailed description

Iodinated contrast media (CM) has been widely used for various diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Coronary angiography and contrast enhanced computed tomography are representative medical procedure in which CM administration is necessary, and their usage are recently extended. Also, U.S sales of medical imaging CM has been increased. Although iodinated CM has useful role in many medical procedures, CM is well known for its renal side effect, contrast induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). CI-AKI is one of the leading cause of iatrogenic acute kidney injury (AKI). Moreover, CI-AKI is known to be an independent risk factor for short- and long term morbidity and mortality. Considering the current rising incidence of CI-AKI, its prevention has been an important issue. The incidence of CI-AKI is below 5% and up to 25% according to presence of risk factors such as renal failure, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, old age and concomitant use of nephrotoxic medications. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an established risk factor for CI-AKI and therefore several guidelines recommend prophylaxis for CI-AKI when patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) below 60mL/min receives CM administration. In those guidelines, it is generally recommend that high risk patients should receive isotonic crystalloid solution and be considered for taking N-acetylcysteine, although there are still debates on its benefit. Several clinical studies have compared 0.9% saline and sodium bicarbonate solution for their effectiveness on CI-AKI prevention, and no superiority was shown in using sodium bicarbonate solution. Hence, most organization currently use 0.9% saline for CI-AKI prophylaxis due to its wide availability. However, several studies showed that 0.9% saline has supra-physiologic dose of chloride and induces metabolic acidosis which contributes renal vasoconstriction and impairment of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Double blind, randomized clinical human study proved that these problems are less pronounced with the use of balanced salt solution, which has physiologic level of chloride and neutral pH. Also, recent prospective pilot study suggested that using chloride restrictive solutions, rather than using chloride rich solutions, for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients can reduce AKI. Considering the above findings, few large scale cohort studies and randomized controlled trials are ongoing to prove preventive effect of balanced salt solution for AKI over 0.9% saline. In conclusion, as stated above, use of 0.9% saline for CI-AKI prophylaxis might have limited benefit only by volume expansion. Considering its components, additional physiologic advantage by using balanced salt solution could be achieved. In order to assess this hypothesis, the investigators planned a multicenter prospective randomized controlled open-label trial comparing balanced salt solution and 0.9% saline to prevent CI-AKI. The primary end-point of this study is event of CI-AKI, which is defined by relative (≥25%) or fixed (≥0.5mg/dL) increase in serum creatinine from baseline value assessed at 48 hours after CM use. The secondary end-point are decrease in eGFR of more than 50% from the baseline eGFR within 48 hours and initiation of dialysis and mortality, after 1 or 6 month from CM exposure. For this purpose, at least 830 subjects would be required for each group when type I error rate is 2.5% and type II error is 20%, given 20% drop-out rate during the study period.

Interventions

DRUGCJ Plasma Solution A Injection

Intravenous plasma solution (Chloride 90 mmoL/L) at 3 mL/kg over 1 hour pre-contrast, followed by the same solution intravenously at 1.5 mL/kg/hr for 4 hours. Intra-vascular low-osmolal or iso-osmolal contrast will be used.

DRUGCJ 0.9% Normal Saline Injection

Intravenous plasma solution (Chloride 154 mmoL/L) at 3 mL/kg over 1 hour pre-contrast, followed by the same solution intravenously at 1.5 mL/kg/hr for 4 hours. Intra-vascular low-osmolal or iso-osmolal contrast will be used.

Sponsors

Kyungpook National University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
National Medical Center, Seoul
CollaboratorOTHER
National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Bundang CHA Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul National University Boramae Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Severance Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Incheon St.Mary's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Gachon University Gil Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals aged 18 years or older * with eGFR \< 45 mL/min/1.73m2 or eGFR \< 60 mL/min/1.73m2 who have at least one condition Diabetes mellitus Age \> 60 year * Able and willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* eGFR \< 15 mL/min/1.73m2 or end stage renal disease patients with dialysis history * Heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction \< 45% or severe symptoms (New York Heart Association functional classification III or IV) * Decompensated heart failure patients who use dobutamine, dopamine, milrinone, amrinone, nesiritide or patients who have acute pulmonary edema * History of hyperkalemia (serum K \> 5.5 mEq/L) or hypernatremia ( serum Na \> 145 mEq/L) in screening period * Recent exposure to radiocontrast within 7 days of the study * History of hypersensitivity to radiocontrast * Multiple myeloma * Pregnant/lactation * Expected survival \< 6 months * Enrolled in other clinical trials

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Contrast Induced Acute Kidney Injury0-48 hourRelative (≥25%) or fixed (≥0.5mg/dL) increase in serum creatinine

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1 month Renal replacement therapy0 to 30 daysInitiation of renal replacement therapy
6 month Renal replacement therapy0 to 180 daysInitiation of renal replacement therapy
Decrease in renal function0-48 hourDecrease in eGFR of more than 50% from the baseline eGFR
6 month Mortality0 to 180 daysMortality
Acute Kidney Injury by KDIGO guideline after CT scan0-48 hourRelative (≥50%) or fixed (≥0.3mg/dL) increase in serum creatinine (otherwise specified in the latest release of KDIGO guideline)
1 month Mortality0 to 30 daysMortality

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026