Skip to content

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of BF-200 ALA Used With Photodynamic Therapy in Patients With Actinic Keratosis.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Multi-Center Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of BF-200 ALA Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis (AK) When Using PDT

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02799082
Enrollment
122
Registered
2016-06-14
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2008-10-31
Last updated
2017-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Actinic Keratosis

Brief summary

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BF-200 ALA (Ameluz) used with photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients suffering from actinic keratosis.

Detailed description

The treatment comprised of one PDT session. If 12 weeks after PDT all lesions were cleared the patient entered the follow-up period. In case of remaining lesions or not completely cleared lesions the patient received a second PDT on the same day. The final assessment was performed 12 weeks after the last PDT and the patient moved to the follow-up phase.

Interventions

DRUGVehicle

topical treatment for photodynamic therapy combining vehicle application and subsequent illumination with broad or narrow spectrum light sources (after 3 h of drug incubation).

topical treatment for photodynamic therapy combining drug application and subsequent illumination with broad or narrow spectrum light sources (after 3 h of drug incubation).

Sponsors

Biofrontera Bioscience GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects were willing and able to sign informed consent form. * Men and women aged between 18 and 85 years inclusive. * Subjects had a general good and stable health condition as confirmed by a physical examination and by medical history. * Subjects with clinically stable medical conditions including, but not limited to the following diseases were allowed to be included into the study, if the medication taken for the treatment of the disease did not match the criteria of the excluded or disallowed medications listed in points 7, 10, 11 and 12 of the

Exclusion criteria

* controlled hypertension * diabetes mellitus type II * hypercholesterolemia * osteoarthritis * Subjects accepted to abstain from sunbathing and the solarium during the study. * Subjects had at least 4 but not more than 8 clinically confirmed actinic keratosis (AK) target lesions of mild to moderate intensity within the face or bald scalp (excluding eyelids, lips and mucosa), i.e. AK grade I and II according to Olsen et. al. 1991. * To document and confirm the diagnosis of the investigators: * Photodocumentation of a representative lesion had to be evaluated and confirmed by an independent expert. * A pre-study biopsy had to be taken from a second representative AK lesion and was histopathologically evaluated by a dermato-pathological expert. * If the evaluation of the photo by the independent reviewer could not confirm the diagnosis of the investigator, then the biopsy result decided whether the subject was eligible for the study. * The AK lesions had to be discrete and quantifiable; the distance from one lesion to its neighbor lesion was greater than 1.0 cm * The diameter of each AK lesion was not less than 0.5 cm and not greater than 1.5 cm. The size of each baseline AK lesion was recorded by measuring the two largest perpendicular diameters. To describe irregular lesions (ellipsoidal) investigators measured the major and minor axis. Both axes had to be above the minimum of 0.5 cm and less than 1.5 cm. * The subjects were free of any significant physical abnormalities (e.g., tattoos, dermatoses) in the potential treatment area that might cause difficulty with examination or final evaluation. * The subjects were willing to stop using moisturizers and any other topical treatments with anti-aging products, vitamin A, vitamin C, and/or vitamin E containing ointments and creams, and green tea preparations during the study within the treatment area. Sunscreens were allowed, but were not to be applied in the treatment area within approximately 24 hours before a clinical visit with lesion count. * Women of childbearing potential were only allowed to participate in this study, if they used a highly effective method of contraception and had a negative serum pregnancy test.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Patient Clearance Rate 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)12 weeks after the last photodynamic therapy (PDT), up to 24 weeksAK clearance rate, defined as the percentage of subjects with complete remission of all AK lesions in the target area(s) assessed 12 weeks after the last PDT (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment).
Total Patient Clearance Rate Treated With Narrow Spectrum Lamp 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeksAK clearance rate, defined as the percentage of subjects with complete remission of all AK lesions in the target area(s) assessed 12 weeks after the last PDT (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment). Analysis was for the subgroup: treated by narrow spectrum lamps only \[n=15 (vehicle), n= 31 (BF-200 ALA)\]

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Total Lesion Size 12 Weeks After the Last PDT12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeksChange in the mean total lesion area 12 weeks per subject after the last PDT compared to baseline (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment). The outcome measure describes the mean difference between total lesion size at baseline and 12 weeks after the last PDT. Negative values indicate a reduction in the total lesion area size compared to baseline.
Change in Total Lesion Area 12 Weeks After the Last PDT (Treated Area Face)12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeksChange in mean total lesion area within the target treatment area per subject 12 weeks after the last PDT compared to baseline (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment). The outcome measure describes the mean difference between total lesion size at baseline and 12 weeks after the last PDT. Negative values indicate a reduction in the total lesion area size compared to baseline. Subgroup Analysis for patients with lesions located in the face only.
Change in Total Lesion Area 12 Weeks After the Last PDT (Treated Area Scalp)12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeksChange in mean total lesion area within the target treatment area per subject 12 weeks after the last PDT compared to baseline (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment). The outcome measure describes the mean difference between total lesion size at baseline and 12 weeks after the last PDT. Negative values indicate a reduction in the total lesion area size compared to baseline. Subgroup Analysis for patients with lesions located in the scalp only.
Subjects With Complete Clearance 12 Weeks After the First PDT12 weeks after the first PDTAK clearance rate, defined as the number of subjects with complete remission of all AK lesions assessed at 12 weeks after the first PDT
Percentage of AK Lesions Showing Complete Remission 12 Weeks After the Last PDT12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeksPercentage of individual lesions completely cleared and with no adherent scaling plaques of AK that were visible any longer 12 weeks after the last PDT (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment); Overall population
Overall Cosmetic Outcome 12 Weeks After the Last PDT12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeksOverall Cosmetic Outcome (CO) 12 weeks after PDT (12 weeks after 1st PDT or 12 weeks after 2nd PDT). The cosmetic outcome at the end-of-study visit was calculated on the basis of skin quality assessment: skin surface, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, mottled/irregular pigmentation, degree of scarring, and atrophy. The CO was rated as very good if the sum score of the previously mentioned ratings (all ratings for each sign added up) has improved by at least 2 points as compared to baseline; the CO was rated as good if the sum score at a given visit has improved by at least 1 point as compared to baseline; the cosmetic outcome is rated as satisfactory if the sum score at a given visit is identical to the one at baseline; the cosmetic outcome is rated as unsatisfactory if the sum score at a given visit has worsened by 1 point compared to baseline, the cosmetic outcome is rated as impaired if the sum score at a given visit has worsened by at least 2 points compared to baseline.
Local Skin Reactionsduring and after PDT [3h - 4 h]Local skin reactions observed immediately after illumination by the investigator were documented using different categories (erythema, edema, induration, vesicles, erosion, ulceration, scaling/flanking, scabbing/crusting,weeping/exudates).
Discomfort During and After PDTduring and after PDT [3h - 4 h]Local discomfort experienced by the patient after illumination were documented in three categories: itching, burning, pain.
Related Adverse Events /AEs)up to 24 weeks after the 1st PDTRelated treatment-emerged-adverse events (TEAEs) until 12 weeks after the last PDT (\>=5%) TEAEs were reported from the day of the 1st PDT until the end-of-study (clinical part), i.e. 12 weeks after the last PDT (until 12 weeks after the 1st PDT or up to 24 weeks in case a 2nd PDT was applied).
Subjects With Partial Clearance 12 Weeks After the Last PDT12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeksPercentage of subjects with clearance of at least 75% of lesions 12 weeks after the last PDT (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment).
Percentage of AK Lesions Showing Complete Remission Treated With Narrow Spectrum Lamp 12 Weeks After the Last PDT12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeksPercentage of individual lesions completely cleared and with no adherent scaling plaques of AK that were visible any longer 12 weeks after the last PDT (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment). for subgroup analysis: patients treated with narrow spectrum lamp only.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study period: December 13, 2007 to October 01, 2008. Patients were recruited at 8 study centers in Germany (hospitals and private practices).

Pre-assignment details

128 patients were screened, of whom 122 patients were randomized (41 patients to the vehicle/placebo group, 81 patients to the BF-200 ALA group); 6 patients were screening failures (3 patients refused to participate, 3 patients meet exclusion criteria).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Vehicle
Topical application of matched placebo gel (without containing active ingredient). Application of a 1 mm thick layer covering each lesion and a 0.5 cm to 1.0 cm surrounding margin. Vehicle: topical treatment for photodynamic therapy combining vehicle application and subsequent illumination with broad or narrow spectrum light sources (after 3 h of drug incubation).
40
BF-200 ALA
Topical application of BF-200 ALA gel containing 78 mg/g 5-aminolevulinic acid. Application of a 1 mm thick layer covering each lesion and a 0.5 cm to 1.0 cm surrounding margin. BF-200 ALA: topical treatment for photodynamic therapy combining drug application and subsequent illumination with broad or narrow spectrum light sources (after 3 h of drug incubation).
80
Total120

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudyRefused second PDT or withdraw consent43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBF-200 ALATotalVehicle
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
70 Participants105 Participants35 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants15 Participants5 Participants
Age, Continuous70.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
70.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
70.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Maximal severity of AK at baseline
mild
19 participants30 participants11 participants
Maximal severity of AK at baseline
moderate
61 participants90 participants29 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
80 Participants120 Participants40 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
80 participants120 participants40 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants17 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
72 Participants103 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 4178 / 81
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 410 / 81

Outcome results

Primary

Total Patient Clearance Rate 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)

AK clearance rate, defined as the percentage of subjects with complete remission of all AK lesions in the target area(s) assessed 12 weeks after the last PDT (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment).

Time frame: 12 weeks after the last photodynamic therapy (PDT), up to 24 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (FAS), Overall

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VehicleTotal Patient Clearance Rate 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)12.5 percentage of participants
BF-200 ALATotal Patient Clearance Rate 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)66.3 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Total Patient Clearance Rate 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)

AK clearance rate, defined as the percentage of subjects with complete remission of all AK lesions in the target area(s) assessed 12 weeks after the last PDT (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment).

Time frame: 12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks

Population: per protocol population (PPP), (Overall)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VehicleTotal Patient Clearance Rate 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)10.8 percentage of participants
BF-200 ALATotal Patient Clearance Rate 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)63.6 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Total Patient Clearance Rate Treated With Narrow Spectrum Lamp 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)

AK clearance rate, defined as the percentage of subjects with complete remission of all AK lesions in the target area(s) assessed 12 weeks after the last PDT (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment). Analysis was for the subgroup: treated by narrow spectrum lamps only \[n=15 (vehicle), n= 31 (BF-200 ALA)\]

Time frame: 12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks

Population: FAS; subgroup analysis for patients only treated with narrow spectrum lamps

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VehicleTotal Patient Clearance Rate Treated With Narrow Spectrum Lamp 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)13.3 percentage of participants
BF-200 ALATotal Patient Clearance Rate Treated With Narrow Spectrum Lamp 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)87.1 percentage of participants
Primary

Total Patient Clearance Rate Treated With Narrow Spectrum Lamp 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)

AK clearance rate, defined as the percentage of subjects with complete remission of all AK lesions in the target area(s) assessed 12 weeks after the last PDT (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment). Analysis was for the subgroup: treated by narrow spectrum lamps only \[n=13 (vehicle), n= 28 (BF-200 ALA)\]

Time frame: 12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks

Population: PPP; subgroup analysis for patients only treated with narrow spectrum lamps

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VehicleTotal Patient Clearance Rate Treated With Narrow Spectrum Lamp 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)15.4 percentage of patients
BF-200 ALATotal Patient Clearance Rate Treated With Narrow Spectrum Lamp 12 Weeks After the Last Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)96.4 percentage of patients
Secondary

Change in Total Lesion Area 12 Weeks After the Last PDT (Treated Area Face)

Change in mean total lesion area within the target treatment area per subject 12 weeks after the last PDT compared to baseline (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment). The outcome measure describes the mean difference between total lesion size at baseline and 12 weeks after the last PDT. Negative values indicate a reduction in the total lesion area size compared to baseline. Subgroup Analysis for patients with lesions located in the face only.

Time frame: 12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VehicleChange in Total Lesion Area 12 Weeks After the Last PDT (Treated Area Face)-94.1 mm²Standard Deviation 213
BF-200 ALAChange in Total Lesion Area 12 Weeks After the Last PDT (Treated Area Face)-315.0 mm²Standard Deviation 198.9
Secondary

Change in Total Lesion Area 12 Weeks After the Last PDT (Treated Area Scalp)

Change in mean total lesion area within the target treatment area per subject 12 weeks after the last PDT compared to baseline (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment). The outcome measure describes the mean difference between total lesion size at baseline and 12 weeks after the last PDT. Negative values indicate a reduction in the total lesion area size compared to baseline. Subgroup Analysis for patients with lesions located in the scalp only.

Time frame: 12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VehicleChange in Total Lesion Area 12 Weeks After the Last PDT (Treated Area Scalp)-112.3 mm²Standard Deviation 154.5
BF-200 ALAChange in Total Lesion Area 12 Weeks After the Last PDT (Treated Area Scalp)-340.2 mm²Standard Deviation 194.5
Secondary

Change in Total Lesion Size 12 Weeks After the Last PDT

Change in the mean total lesion area 12 weeks per subject after the last PDT compared to baseline (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment). The outcome measure describes the mean difference between total lesion size at baseline and 12 weeks after the last PDT. Negative values indicate a reduction in the total lesion area size compared to baseline.

Time frame: 12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks

Population: FAS (Overall)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VehicleChange in Total Lesion Size 12 Weeks After the Last PDT-110.3 mm²Standard Deviation 207.9
BF-200 ALAChange in Total Lesion Size 12 Weeks After the Last PDT-360.2 mm²Standard Deviation 194.5
Secondary

Discomfort During and After PDT

Local discomfort experienced by the patient after illumination were documented in three categories: itching, burning, pain.

Time frame: during and after PDT [3h - 4 h]

Population: Safety Population (Overall reactions after first and/or second PDT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VehicleDiscomfort During and After PDTburning10 Participants
VehicleDiscomfort During and After PDTpain4 Participants
VehicleDiscomfort During and After PDTitching0 Participants
BF-200 ALADiscomfort During and After PDTburning70 Participants
BF-200 ALADiscomfort During and After PDTpain44 Participants
BF-200 ALADiscomfort During and After PDTitching23 Participants
Secondary

Local Skin Reactions

Local skin reactions observed immediately after illumination by the investigator were documented using different categories (erythema, edema, induration, vesicles, erosion, ulceration, scaling/flanking, scabbing/crusting,weeping/exudates).

Time frame: during and after PDT [3h - 4 h]

Population: Safety Population, Overall reactions after first and/or second PDT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VehicleLocal Skin Reactionsedema1 Participants
VehicleLocal Skin Reactionsulceration0 Participants
VehicleLocal Skin Reactionsvesicles0 Participants
VehicleLocal Skin Reactionsscaling/flaking0 Participants
VehicleLocal Skin Reactionsinduration0 Participants
VehicleLocal Skin Reactionsscabbing/crusting0 Participants
VehicleLocal Skin Reactionserosion0 Participants
VehicleLocal Skin Reactionsweeping/exudate0 Participants
VehicleLocal Skin Reactionserythema15 Participants
BF-200 ALALocal Skin Reactionsweeping/exudate0 Participants
BF-200 ALALocal Skin Reactionserythema72 Participants
BF-200 ALALocal Skin Reactionsedema32 Participants
BF-200 ALALocal Skin Reactionsinduration12 Participants
BF-200 ALALocal Skin Reactionsvesicles0 Participants
BF-200 ALALocal Skin Reactionserosion0 Participants
BF-200 ALALocal Skin Reactionsulceration0 Participants
BF-200 ALALocal Skin Reactionsscaling/flaking3 Participants
BF-200 ALALocal Skin Reactionsscabbing/crusting2 Participants
Secondary

Overall Cosmetic Outcome 12 Weeks After the Last PDT

Overall Cosmetic Outcome (CO) 12 weeks after PDT (12 weeks after 1st PDT or 12 weeks after 2nd PDT). The cosmetic outcome at the end-of-study visit was calculated on the basis of skin quality assessment: skin surface, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, mottled/irregular pigmentation, degree of scarring, and atrophy. The CO was rated as very good if the sum score of the previously mentioned ratings (all ratings for each sign added up) has improved by at least 2 points as compared to baseline; the CO was rated as good if the sum score at a given visit has improved by at least 1 point as compared to baseline; the cosmetic outcome is rated as satisfactory if the sum score at a given visit is identical to the one at baseline; the cosmetic outcome is rated as unsatisfactory if the sum score at a given visit has worsened by 1 point compared to baseline, the cosmetic outcome is rated as impaired if the sum score at a given visit has worsened by at least 2 points compared to baseline.

Time frame: 12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VehicleOverall Cosmetic Outcome 12 Weeks After the Last PDTgood6 Participants
VehicleOverall Cosmetic Outcome 12 Weeks After the Last PDTunsatisfactory5 Participants
VehicleOverall Cosmetic Outcome 12 Weeks After the Last PDTsatisfactory21 Participants
VehicleOverall Cosmetic Outcome 12 Weeks After the Last PDTimpaired4 Participants
VehicleOverall Cosmetic Outcome 12 Weeks After the Last PDTvery good4 Participants
BF-200 ALAOverall Cosmetic Outcome 12 Weeks After the Last PDTimpaired1 Participants
BF-200 ALAOverall Cosmetic Outcome 12 Weeks After the Last PDTvery good19 Participants
BF-200 ALAOverall Cosmetic Outcome 12 Weeks After the Last PDTgood19 Participants
BF-200 ALAOverall Cosmetic Outcome 12 Weeks After the Last PDTsatisfactory39 Participants
BF-200 ALAOverall Cosmetic Outcome 12 Weeks After the Last PDTunsatisfactory2 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of AK Lesions Showing Complete Remission 12 Weeks After the Last PDT

Percentage of individual lesions completely cleared and with no adherent scaling plaques of AK that were visible any longer 12 weeks after the last PDT (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment); Overall population

Time frame: 12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks

Population: FAS (Overall)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VehiclePercentage of AK Lesions Showing Complete Remission 12 Weeks After the Last PDT20.9 percentage of lesions
BF-200 ALAPercentage of AK Lesions Showing Complete Remission 12 Weeks After the Last PDT81.1 percentage of lesions
Secondary

Percentage of AK Lesions Showing Complete Remission Treated With Narrow Spectrum Lamp 12 Weeks After the Last PDT

Percentage of individual lesions completely cleared and with no adherent scaling plaques of AK that were visible any longer 12 weeks after the last PDT (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment). for subgroup analysis: patients treated with narrow spectrum lamp only.

Time frame: 12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks

Population: FAS, subgroup: lesions treated with narrow spectrum lamp only

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VehiclePercentage of AK Lesions Showing Complete Remission Treated With Narrow Spectrum Lamp 12 Weeks After the Last PDT15.1 percentage of lesions
BF-200 ALAPercentage of AK Lesions Showing Complete Remission Treated With Narrow Spectrum Lamp 12 Weeks After the Last PDT96.3 percentage of lesions
Secondary

Related Adverse Events /AEs)

Related treatment-emerged-adverse events (TEAEs) until 12 weeks after the last PDT (\>=5%) TEAEs were reported from the day of the 1st PDT until the end-of-study (clinical part), i.e. 12 weeks after the last PDT (until 12 weeks after the 1st PDT or up to 24 weeks in case a 2nd PDT was applied).

Time frame: up to 24 weeks after the 1st PDT

Population: safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VehicleRelated Adverse Events /AEs)Application site pain4 Participants
VehicleRelated Adverse Events /AEs)Application site pruritus0 Participants
VehicleRelated Adverse Events /AEs)Application site irritation10 Participants
VehicleRelated Adverse Events /AEs)Application site induration0 Participants
VehicleRelated Adverse Events /AEs)Application site oedema1 Participants
VehicleRelated Adverse Events /AEs)Application site reaction2 Participants
VehicleRelated Adverse Events /AEs)Application site erythema15 Participants
BF-200 ALARelated Adverse Events /AEs)Application site reaction9 Participants
BF-200 ALARelated Adverse Events /AEs)Application site erythema72 Participants
BF-200 ALARelated Adverse Events /AEs)Application site irritation70 Participants
BF-200 ALARelated Adverse Events /AEs)Application site pain44 Participants
BF-200 ALARelated Adverse Events /AEs)Application site oedema32 Participants
BF-200 ALARelated Adverse Events /AEs)Application site pruritus27 Participants
BF-200 ALARelated Adverse Events /AEs)Application site induration12 Participants
Secondary

Subjects With Complete Clearance 12 Weeks After the First PDT

AK clearance rate, defined as the number of subjects with complete remission of all AK lesions assessed at 12 weeks after the first PDT

Time frame: 12 weeks after the first PDT

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VehicleSubjects With Complete Clearance 12 Weeks After the First PDT10.0 percentage of patients
BF-200 ALASubjects With Complete Clearance 12 Weeks After the First PDT47.5 percentage of patients
p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Subjects With Partial Clearance 12 Weeks After the Last PDT

Percentage of subjects with clearance of at least 75% of lesions 12 weeks after the last PDT (12 weeks after the 1st PDT or 12 weeks after the 2nd PDT in case of retreatment).

Time frame: 12 weeks after the last PDT, up to 24 weeks

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VehicleSubjects With Partial Clearance 12 Weeks After the Last PDT17.5 percentage of patients
BF-200 ALASubjects With Partial Clearance 12 Weeks After the Last PDT78.8 percentage of patients
p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026