Skip to content

Reducing Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care Pediatrics (Project RedDE)

Reducing Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care Pediatrics

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02798354
Enrollment
13853
Registered
2016-06-14
Start date
2015-06-01
Completion date
2017-10-31
Last updated
2019-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diagnostic Errors

Keywords

Depression, Blood Pressure, Anemias, Iron-Deficiency, Streptococcal Infections, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Lead Poisoning, Nervous System, Childhood, Thyrotropin

Brief summary

The proposal will focus on 3 specific, high-risk, pediatric ambulatory diagnostic errors each representing a unique dimension of diagnostic assessment: evaluation of symptoms, evaluation of signs and follow-up of diagnostic tests. Adolescent depression (i.e. symptoms) affects nearly 10% of teenagers, is misdiagnosed in almost 75% of adolescents and causes significant morbidity. Pediatric elevated blood pressure (signs) is misdiagnosed in 74-87% of patients, often due to inaccurate application of blood pressure parameters that change based on age, gender and height. Actionable pediatric laboratory values (diagnostic tests) are potentially delayed up to 26% of the time in preliminary investigations and 7-65% in adults, leading to harm and malpractice claims. The investigators propose to conduct a multisite, prospective, stepped wedge cluster randomized trial testing a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) intervention within the American Academy of Pediatrics' Quality Improvement Innovation Networks (QuIIN) to reduce the incidence of pediatric primary care diagnostic errors. QuIIN is a national network of over 300 primary care practices, ranging from tertiary care academic medical centers to single practitioner private practices, interested in and experienced with QICs. Because many processes are likely to be common across diagnostic errors in outpatient settings, a multifaceted intervention, such as a QIC, has a high likelihood of success and broad applicability across populations. Preparatory inquiries to QuIIN primary care providers suggest high interest in reducing these 3 diagnostic errors and provider agreement with randomization to evaluate diagnostic error interventions. Practices will be randomized to one of three groups, with each group collecting retrospective baseline data on one error above, and then intervening to reduce that error during the first eight months. Each group will concurrently collect control data on an error they are not intervening on during those eight months. Following those eight months, the groups will continue intervening on their first error, begin intervening on the error they were a control site for, and begin collecting data on the third error for which they will be a control site for. Finally, in the final eight months, all groups will intervene on all three errors. A second wave of practices will be recruited to join the groups after eight months and will only intervene on two of the three errors.

Detailed description

Objectives: Primary • To determine whether a QIC consisting of evidence-based best-practice methodologies, mini-root cause analyses, data sharing, and behavior change techniques, is associated with a reduction in 3 specific diagnostic error rates in a national group of pediatric primary care practices. * Hypothesis 1: Implementation of a QIC will lead to a 40% reduction in missed diagnosis of adolescent depression. * Hypothesis 2: Implementation of a QIC will lead to a 30% reduction in missed diagnosis of pediatric elevated blood pressure. * Hypothesis 3: Implementation of a QIC will lead to a 45% reduction in delayed diagnosis of actionable laboratory results. Secondary * To determine if a QIC's effect changes for wave 1 versus wave 2 participants, or for the second versus the first error a practice intervenes on. * To further investigate the epidemiology of three ambulatory pediatric diagnostic errors: missed diagnosis of adolescent depression, missed diagnosis of pediatric elevated blood pressure, and delayed diagnosis of actionable laboratory results. * To evaluate patient outcomes related to these diagnoses including outcomes after positive depression screening, missed elevated blood pressure screening and delayed diagnosis of actionable laboratory values.

Interventions

1)Every 8 month 1-2 day interactive webinar learning sessions 2)Monthly webinars sharing best practices 3)Monthly team interactions with dedicated QI coach 4)Monthly data submission on both process and outcome measures 5)Monthly data feedback both at aggregate level with full inter-team transparency as well as at institutional level 6)Monthly mini root cause analyses performed on 1 error at each site 7)Multidisciplinary teams consisting of at least a physician, nurse, and office practice associate 8)Instruction on best practices from content area experts in QI, diagnostic errors, hypertension, mental health, leadership, behavior change, Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ) and EHRs 9)Ongoing sharing of best ideas and barriers/issues among institutional teams

Sponsors

American Academy of Pediatrics
CollaboratorOTHER
Montefiore Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
26 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The investigators will include 30 primary care pediatric practices that are part of the American Academy of Pediatrics' QuIIN (Quality Improvement Innovation Networks) organization. The second wave will recruit 15 additional practices. * Practices must have sufficient volumes of adolescent well child visits (17 per month) and all well child visits (30 per month), and be able to query their EHR systems in order to be included in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Elevated Blood Pressure Measured and Appropriately Acted on by ProvidersCollected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure \>= 90th percentile for age, gender and height or \>=120/80 in \>=3 years old patients at well child visits and at least one of: 1) provider repeated blood pressure, 2) clinic note mentions elevated blood pressure/hypertension 3) plan included recheck or evaluation of blood pressure, or 4) ordering laboratory or other studies to evaluate elevated blood pressure
Number of Adolescents Diagnosed With Depression Seen in Well Child VisitsCollected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)Patients \>=11 years old with documentation of major depression or subsyndromal depression diagnoses in the medical record
Number of Patients With Abnormal Laboratory Results With Appropriate Actions Without DelayCollected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)Documented action step for first positive within 30 days: 1. Hemoglobin (Hgb) less than 11 and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) less than 75 in 1 or 2 year old without documentation of beginning iron, sending iron studies or family conversation 2. Lead greater than 5 without documentation of family conversation on lead remediation or plan to retest Documented action step for first positive within 7 days: 1. Positive Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, Syphilis or Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test without documentation of antibiotics begun or referral to HIV specialist 2. Positive group A streptococcal throat culture with negative rapid group A streptococcal test without documentation of antibiotics begun or family conversation 3. Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) less than 0.5 or greater than 4.5 in greater than 1 year old without plan to repeat lab values or referral to endocrinologist

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Abnormal Laboratory Results Received and Recognized by ProviderCollected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)Provider documentation of abnormal laboratory value, of appropriate diagnosis (e.g. iron deficiency anemia) or appropriate action taken without delay as defined above.
Number of Patients With Elevated Blood Pressures Measured and Recognized by ProviderCollected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure \>= 90th percentile for age, gender and height or \>=120/80 in \>=3 years old patients at well child visits with provider documentation of abnormal blood pressure or appropriate action taken
Number of Adolescents With Mental Health Addressed During Their Well Child VisitCollected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)Provider screened for mental health concerns either with standard screening tool or clinical judgement and documented mental health concerns or no mental health concerns.
Number of Patients With Elevated Blood Pressures Measured and Blood Pressure Percentiles Documented in the ChartCollected Monthly (5-0 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure \>= 90th percentile for age, gender and height or \>=120/80 in \>=3 years old patients at well child visits with blood pressure percentiles documented per the 4th Report.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Clinics Reaching Pre-Determined Threshold for Providers With Laboratory Results Unread/Unacknowledged in Their Electronic Health Record (EHR) Inbox for More Than 72 HrsCollected at 4 monthsClinics reported percent of EHR inboxes with laboratory results unread/unacknowledged in their electronic health record (EHR) inbox for more than 72 hrs each month. They reported whether this percentage was equal to or less than 10%, the pre-determined threshold. They only collected this process measure until they were compliant with the threshold for 2 consecutive months.
Percent of Clinics Reaching Predetermined Threshold for Adolescents Screened for Depression With Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Modified (PHQ-9M) During Well Child VisitsCollected monthly for 8 months when practice is intervening on this topicClinics reported percent of adolescent well child visit charts with depression screening done each month. They reported whether this percentage was equal to or greater than 90%, the pre-determined threshold. They only collected this process measure until they were compliant with the threshold for 2 consecutive months.
Percent of Clinics Reaching Pre-determined Threshold for Children Greater Than or Equal to 3 Yrs Old Receiving Blood Pressure Measurements at Triage for Well Child VisitsCollected until 2 monthsClinics reported percent of well child visit charts with blood pressure measurements at triage done each month. They reported whether this percentage was equal to or greater than 90%, the pre-determined threshold. They only collected this process measure until they were compliant with the threshold for 2 consecutive months.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Of note, initial control data were collected prior to the first Intervention Period

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Reduce Elevated Blood Pressure Errors
A national cohort of pediatric practices enrolled in a Quality Improvement Collaborative intervention focused on reducing three errors of interest: blood pressure, labs and depression diagnoses. Each practice was cluster-randomized to collect control data on and then start working to reduce one of the three errors. During this first nine-month action phase, they also collected control data on a second error. Subsequently, practices worked to reduce this second error during an eight month action phase, while collecting control data on a third error. Finally, they worked to reduce this third error. During the second and third phases, they continued to collect data on the first and second errors. Data presented aggregates all control and intervention phase data respectively, from all three cohorts.
3,562
Reduce Depression Errors
A national cohort of pediatric practices enrolled in a Quality Improvement Collaborative intervention focused on reducing three errors of interest: blood pressure, labs and depression diagnoses. Each practice was cluster-randomized to collect control data on and then start working to reduce one of the three errors. During this first nine-month action phase, they also collected control data on a second error. Subsequently, practices worked to reduce this second error during an eight month action phase, while collecting control data on a third error. Finally, they worked to reduce this third error. During the second and third phases, they continued to collect data on the first and second errors. Data presented aggregates all control and intervention phase data respectively, from all three cohorts.
7,508
Reduce Lab Related Errors
A national cohort of pediatric practices enrolled in a Quality Improvement Collaborative intervention focused on reducing three errors of interest: blood pressure, labs and depression diagnoses. Each practice was cluster-randomized to collect control data on and then start working to reduce one of the three errors. During this first nine-month action phase, they also collected control data on a second error. Subsequently, practices worked to reduce this second error during an eight month action phase, while collecting control data on a third error. Finally, they worked to reduce this third error. During the second and third phases, they continued to collect data on the first and second errors. Data presented aggregates all control and intervention phase data respectively, from all three cohorts.
2,783
Total13,853

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicReduce Elevated Blood Pressure ErrorsReduce Depression ErrorsReduce Lab Related ErrorsTotal
Age, Categorical
Control Group
<=18 years
1695 Participants3277 Participants1282 Participants6254 Participants
Age, Categorical
Control Group
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Control Group
Between 18 and 65 years
33 Participants117 Participants75 Participants225 Participants
Age, Categorical
Intervention Group
<=18 years
1805 Participants3967 Participants1332 Participants7104 Participants
Age, Categorical
Intervention Group
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Intervention Group
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants147 Participants94 Participants270 Participants
Insurance Status
Control Group
Non-private Insurance
1251 Participants2383 Participants1035 Participants4669 Participants
Insurance Status
Control Group
Private Insurance
477 Participants1011 Participants322 Participants1810 Participants
Insurance Status
Intervention Group
Non-private Insurance
1368 Participants3028 Participants1104 Participants5500 Participants
Insurance Status
Intervention Group
Private Insurance
466 Participants1086 Participants322 Participants1874 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Control Group
Female
836 Participants1677 Participants693 Participants3206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Control Group
Male
892 Participants1717 Participants664 Participants3273 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Intervention Group
Female
880 Participants2094 Participants742 Participants3716 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Intervention Group
Male
954 Participants2020 Participants684 Participants3658 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Adolescents Diagnosed With Depression Seen in Well Child Visits

Patients \>=11 years old with documentation of major depression or subsyndromal depression diagnoses in the medical record

Time frame: Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupNumber of Adolescents Diagnosed With Depression Seen in Well Child Visits233 Participants
Intervention GroupNumber of Adolescents Diagnosed With Depression Seen in Well Child Visits443 Participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.4, 5.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Number of Patients With Abnormal Laboratory Results With Appropriate Actions Without Delay

Documented action step for first positive within 30 days: 1. Hemoglobin (Hgb) less than 11 and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) less than 75 in 1 or 2 year old without documentation of beginning iron, sending iron studies or family conversation 2. Lead greater than 5 without documentation of family conversation on lead remediation or plan to retest Documented action step for first positive within 7 days: 1. Positive Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, Syphilis or Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test without documentation of antibiotics begun or referral to HIV specialist 2. Positive group A streptococcal throat culture with negative rapid group A streptococcal test without documentation of antibiotics begun or family conversation 3. Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) less than 0.5 or greater than 4.5 in greater than 1 year old without plan to repeat lab values or referral to endocrinologist

Time frame: Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Abnormal Laboratory Results With Appropriate Actions Without Delay1273 Participants
Intervention GroupNumber of Patients With Abnormal Laboratory Results With Appropriate Actions Without Delay1329 Participants
p-value: 0.30295% CI: [-1, 3.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Number of Patients With Elevated Blood Pressure Measured and Appropriately Acted on by Providers

Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure \>= 90th percentile for age, gender and height or \>=120/80 in \>=3 years old patients at well child visits and at least one of: 1) provider repeated blood pressure, 2) clinic note mentions elevated blood pressure/hypertension 3) plan included recheck or evaluation of blood pressure, or 4) ordering laboratory or other studies to evaluate elevated blood pressure

Time frame: Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Elevated Blood Pressure Measured and Appropriately Acted on by Providers969 Participants
Intervention GroupNumber of Patients With Elevated Blood Pressure Measured and Appropriately Acted on by Providers1378 Participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [12.3, 20]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Adolescents With Mental Health Addressed During Their Well Child Visit

Provider screened for mental health concerns either with standard screening tool or clinical judgement and documented mental health concerns or no mental health concerns.

Time frame: Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupNumber of Adolescents With Mental Health Addressed During Their Well Child Visit1782 Participants
Intervention GroupNumber of Adolescents With Mental Health Addressed During Their Well Child Visit3075 Participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [22.4, 30.7]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Patients With Abnormal Laboratory Results Received and Recognized by Provider

Provider documentation of abnormal laboratory value, of appropriate diagnosis (e.g. iron deficiency anemia) or appropriate action taken without delay as defined above.

Time frame: Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Abnormal Laboratory Results Received and Recognized by Provider1292 Participants
Intervention GroupNumber of Patients With Abnormal Laboratory Results Received and Recognized by Provider1339 Participants
p-value: 0.92295% CI: [-1.8, 1.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Patients With Elevated Blood Pressures Measured and Blood Pressure Percentiles Documented in the Chart

Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure \>= 90th percentile for age, gender and height or \>=120/80 in \>=3 years old patients at well child visits with blood pressure percentiles documented per the 4th Report.

Time frame: Collected Monthly (5-0 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Elevated Blood Pressures Measured and Blood Pressure Percentiles Documented in the Chart1233 Participants
Intervention GroupNumber of Patients With Elevated Blood Pressures Measured and Blood Pressure Percentiles Documented in the Chart1681 Participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16.2, 24.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Patients With Elevated Blood Pressures Measured and Recognized by Provider

Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure \>= 90th percentile for age, gender and height or \>=120/80 in \>=3 years old patients at well child visits with provider documentation of abnormal blood pressure or appropriate action taken

Time frame: Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupNumber of Patients With Elevated Blood Pressures Measured and Recognized by Provider1013 Participants
Intervention GroupNumber of Patients With Elevated Blood Pressures Measured and Recognized by Provider1394 Participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [10.3, 17.7]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Percent of Clinics Reaching Predetermined Threshold for Adolescents Screened for Depression With Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Modified (PHQ-9M) During Well Child Visits

Clinics reported percent of adolescent well child visit charts with depression screening done each month. They reported whether this percentage was equal to or greater than 90%, the pre-determined threshold. They only collected this process measure until they were compliant with the threshold for 2 consecutive months.

Time frame: Collected monthly for 8 months when practice is intervening on this topic

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Control GroupPercent of Clinics Reaching Predetermined Threshold for Adolescents Screened for Depression With Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Modified (PHQ-9M) During Well Child VisitsPercent of Clinics meeting threshold at 5 months15 Clinics
Control GroupPercent of Clinics Reaching Predetermined Threshold for Adolescents Screened for Depression With Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Modified (PHQ-9M) During Well Child VisitsPercent of Clinics meeting threshold at 8 months21 Clinics
Other Pre-specified

Percent of Clinics Reaching Pre-determined Threshold for Children Greater Than or Equal to 3 Yrs Old Receiving Blood Pressure Measurements at Triage for Well Child Visits

Clinics reported percent of well child visit charts with blood pressure measurements at triage done each month. They reported whether this percentage was equal to or greater than 90%, the pre-determined threshold. They only collected this process measure until they were compliant with the threshold for 2 consecutive months.

Time frame: Collected until 2 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Control GroupPercent of Clinics Reaching Pre-determined Threshold for Children Greater Than or Equal to 3 Yrs Old Receiving Blood Pressure Measurements at Triage for Well Child Visits27 Clinics
Other Pre-specified

Percent of Clinics Reaching Pre-Determined Threshold for Providers With Laboratory Results Unread/Unacknowledged in Their Electronic Health Record (EHR) Inbox for More Than 72 Hrs

Clinics reported percent of EHR inboxes with laboratory results unread/unacknowledged in their electronic health record (EHR) inbox for more than 72 hrs each month. They reported whether this percentage was equal to or less than 10%, the pre-determined threshold. They only collected this process measure until they were compliant with the threshold for 2 consecutive months.

Time frame: Collected at 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Control GroupPercent of Clinics Reaching Pre-Determined Threshold for Providers With Laboratory Results Unread/Unacknowledged in Their Electronic Health Record (EHR) Inbox for More Than 72 Hrs27 Clinics

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026