Advance Care Planning, End of Life Care
Conditions
Brief summary
Advance Care Planning (ACP) is a process of 'reflection and communication, in which a person with decision-making capacity makes decisions regarding their future health and/or personal care in the event that they become incapable of consenting to or refusing treatment' Most Canadians have not planned for end-of-life Care and are at risk of aggressive medical care that may not be compatible with their wishes. This study aims to systematically evaluate local barriers to making personal choices with regards to life support interventions that can be provided in the contemporary Intensive Care Unit.
Detailed description
HYPOTHESIS: The overarching hypothesis is that the average layperson lacks sufficient knowledge about the aggressive life support measures used routinely in contemporary Critical Care to make informed decisions for themselves and their loved ones. Considering that most Canadians have not even heard of the term Advance Care Planning, it is likely that there is a gap in their knowledge and expectations of Critical Care. Such a gap can be bridged through education - the only caveat being that the individual should be in full possession of their faculties and can make informed decisions. This point is critical. Thus this study uses a mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative) research design to address the following questions: 1) What is the state of knowledge about Critical Care interventions among healthy elderly laypersons in London, Ontario? 2) What are the barriers to formulating ACPs? 3) What opportunities exist for increasing ACP in the healthy elderly population? The primary objective of this proposal is to assess public knowledge of Critical Care interventions (and their outcomes) from the perspective of making Advance Care Plans. Secondary Objectives are 1) To evaluate local barriers to Advance Care Planning 2) To determine effective modes of education for Advance Care Planning that could be used for the community and in our hospital setting.
Interventions
OTHERsemi-structured interviews
Sponsors
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Members from the community who are i) \> 55 yrs of age, ii) living in London Middlesex community, iii) not housebound, iv) in apparent good health and iv) have the ability to make independent decisions for themselves
Exclusion criteria
* Factors that preclude a meaningful interview (such as cognitive impairment, aphasia, profound hearing impairment, language barriers) or anticipated emotional burden with the proposed topic.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Lay person perception and knowledge of various Critical Care interventions | 1 year | This is a qualitative study. The primary objective of this proposal is to assess public knowledge of Critical Care interventions (and their outcomes) from the perspective of making Advance Care Plans. Examples of such interventions include but are not limited to Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, dialysis and artificial feeding. Outcomes involve lay person knowledge, beliefs and perceptions of Critical care from the perspective of making Advance Care Plans. |
Countries
Canada
Outcome results
None listed