Skip to content

Preventive Effects of Ginseng Against Atherosclerosis

Preventive Effects of Ginseng Against Atherosclerosis and Subsequent Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02796664
Acronym
PEGASUS
Enrollment
58
Registered
2016-06-13
Start date
2016-06-23
Completion date
2018-07-04
Last updated
2021-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic Stroke, Atherosclerosis

Keywords

Ginseng, Stroke, Quantitative magnetic resonance flow analysis

Brief summary

This study is a 12-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The purpose of this study is to determine whether ginseng is effective in the prevention of atherosclerosis and subsequent ischemic stroke. High-risk patients with severe atherosclerosis in the major intracranial arteries and extracranial carotid artery were enrolled.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTGinseng

Korean Red Ginseng extract tablet (0.5 grams/tablet, 2 tablets twice a day) daily for 12 months.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo

Placebo (0.5 grams/tablet, 2 tablets twice a day) daily for 12 months.

Sponsors

Korea Ginseng Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Dae Chul Suh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients were included if they 1. were aged 20 to 80 years; 2. had occlusion or severe stenosis (≥ 70%) of extracranial carotid artery and major intracranial arteries (intracranial carotid artery, middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, intracranial vertebral, basilar, or posterior cerebral artery) as documented by cerebral catheter angiography; 3. had any risk factor for stroke, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, alcohol drinking, or previous stroke history; 4. had no adverse reactions to administration of ginseng; and 5. agreed to participate in the trial.

Exclusion criteria

Patients were excluded if they 1. did not agree to participate in the trial; 2. had any genetic cerebrovascular diseases; 3. had adverse reactions to contrast medium; 4. were pregnant or planning to be pregnant; 5. had a history of cardioembolic stroke; 6. had an emboligenic cardiac disease such as atrial fibrillation, valve disease, congestive heart failure, or recent myocardial infarction; 7. had a risk of stroke of other determined etiology according to the TOAST classification; 8. had undergone any neurointervention procedure or surgery, such as intra-arterial thrombolysis, angioplasty procedures, carotid endarterectomy, or bypass surgery; 9. had chronic kidney disease (GFR \< 30 ml/min); or 10. had severe hepatic dysfunction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Composite of Cerebral Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic AttackTwelve months after randomization.The 1-year composite of cerebral ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack downstream to an atherosclerotic lesion
Modified Rankin ScaleTwelve months after randomization.Presence of other cerebro-cardiovascular morbidity or mortality assessed by aggravation of patient status (modified Rankin Scale). The modified Rankin Scale is ranging from 0 to 5. The higher scale indicates the worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Changes in Volumetric Blood Flow (ml/Sec) in Intracranial Vessels.At randomization and twelve months after randomization.The changes in volumetric blood flow (ml/sec) in intracranial vessels assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance angiography with noninvasive optimal vessel analysis.
The Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.At randomization and twelve months after randomization.The changes of white matter hyperintensities, assessed by the Fazekas scale using brain magnetic resonance imaging. The Fazekas scale is a 4 point white matter disease severity scale with values ranging from 0 to 3. It quantifies the amount of white matter T2 hyperintense lesions each in periventricular white matter and deep white matter. Higher scales mean a worse white matter status. In the region of the periventricular white matter, 0 means absence of the lesion; 1, caps or pencil-thin lining lesion; 2, smooth halo lesion; 3, irregular high intense signal extending into the deep shite matter. In the region of the deep white matter, 0 means absence of the lesion; 1, punctate foci lesions; 2, beginning confluence; 3, large confluent hyperintense areas.
Number of Participants With Changes of Parenchymal Ischemic LesionsAt randomization and twelve months after randomization.The changes of ischemic parenchymal lesions, assessed by brain magnetic resonance images acquired at randomization and twelve months after randomization. We counted the number of participants who had new ischemic parenchymal lesions at twelve months after randomization.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Drug ComplianceAt twelve months after randomization.We calculated average drug compliance based on the number of remained drugs at each follow-up.

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients in a single center, from June 2016 to June 2017.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ginseng
Korean Red Ginseng extract tablet (0.5 grams/tablet, 2 tablets twice a day) daily for 12 months.
28
Placebo
Placebo (0.5 grams/tablet, 2 tablets twice a day) daily for 12 months.
24
Total52

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyNoncompliance11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject03

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboGinsengTotal
Age, Continuous58.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
63.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Alcohol drinking9 Participants6 Participants15 Participants
Angina pectoris2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Antidiabetic medication3 Participants9 Participants12 Participants
Antihyperlipidemic medication21 Participants25 Participants46 Participants
Antihypertensive medication13 Participants21 Participants34 Participants
Antiplatelet medication
Dual antiplatelet
14 Participants17 Participants31 Participants
Antiplatelet medication
Mono antiplatelet
9 Participants8 Participants17 Participants
Antiplatelet medication
None
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Antiplatelet medication
Other antiplatelet
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Atrial fibrillation0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
mRS 0
22 Participants21 Participants43 Participants
Baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
mRS 1
1 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
mRS 2
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
mRS 3
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
mRS 4
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
mRS 5
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Diabetes mellitus4 Participants10 Participants14 Participants
Hyperlipidemia15 Participants23 Participants38 Participants
Hypertension14 Participants20 Participants34 Participants
Myocardial infarction0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Previous stroke history9 Participants13 Participants22 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
24 Participants28 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants13 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants15 Participants31 Participants
Smoking13 Participants5 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 291 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 292 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 291 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Modified Rankin Scale

Presence of other cerebro-cardiovascular morbidity or mortality assessed by aggravation of patient status (modified Rankin Scale). The modified Rankin Scale is ranging from 0 to 5. The higher scale indicates the worse outcome.

Time frame: Twelve months after randomization.

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GinsengModified Rankin ScalemRS 021 Participants
GinsengModified Rankin ScalemRS 15 Participants
GinsengModified Rankin ScalemRS 20 Participants
GinsengModified Rankin ScalemRS 32 Participants
GinsengModified Rankin ScalemRS 40 Participants
GinsengModified Rankin ScalemRS 50 Participants
PlaceboModified Rankin ScalemRS 40 Participants
PlaceboModified Rankin ScalemRS 022 Participants
PlaceboModified Rankin ScalemRS 31 Participants
PlaceboModified Rankin ScalemRS 11 Participants
PlaceboModified Rankin ScalemRS 50 Participants
PlaceboModified Rankin ScalemRS 20 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no relationship between ginseng administration and modified Rankin Scale at follow-up.p-value: 0.34Fisher Exact
Primary

The Composite of Cerebral Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack

The 1-year composite of cerebral ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack downstream to an atherosclerotic lesion

Time frame: Twelve months after randomization.

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GinsengThe Composite of Cerebral Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic AttackIschemic stroke0 Participants
GinsengThe Composite of Cerebral Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic AttackTransient ischemic attack0 Participants
PlaceboThe Composite of Cerebral Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic AttackIschemic stroke0 Participants
PlaceboThe Composite of Cerebral Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic AttackTransient ischemic attack1 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no relationship between ginseng administration and cerebral ischemic events including ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. The number of participants who suffered ischemic stroke and the number of paticipants who suffered transient ischemic attack were analyzed together to test the null hypothesis in two by two table.p-value: 0.462Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Participants With Changes of Parenchymal Ischemic Lesions

The changes of ischemic parenchymal lesions, assessed by brain magnetic resonance images acquired at randomization and twelve months after randomization. We counted the number of participants who had new ischemic parenchymal lesions at twelve months after randomization.

Time frame: At randomization and twelve months after randomization.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GinsengNumber of Participants With Changes of Parenchymal Ischemic LesionsIschemic lesion (+)22 Participants
GinsengNumber of Participants With Changes of Parenchymal Ischemic LesionsIschemic lesion (-)6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Changes of Parenchymal Ischemic LesionsIschemic lesion (+)15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Changes of Parenchymal Ischemic LesionsIschemic lesion (-)9 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no relationship between ginseng administration and parenchymal ischemic lesions at follow-up.p-value: 0.23Chi-squared
Secondary

The Changes in Volumetric Blood Flow (ml/Sec) in Intracranial Vessels.

The changes in volumetric blood flow (ml/sec) in intracranial vessels assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance angiography with noninvasive optimal vessel analysis.

Time frame: At randomization and twelve months after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GinsengThe Changes in Volumetric Blood Flow (ml/Sec) in Intracranial Vessels.The flow change in collateral vesselAggravated4 Participants
GinsengThe Changes in Volumetric Blood Flow (ml/Sec) in Intracranial Vessels.The flow change in steno-occlusive lesionImproved4 Participants
GinsengThe Changes in Volumetric Blood Flow (ml/Sec) in Intracranial Vessels.The flow change in collateral vesselImproved7 Participants
GinsengThe Changes in Volumetric Blood Flow (ml/Sec) in Intracranial Vessels.The flow change in steno-occlusive lesionNo change17 Participants
GinsengThe Changes in Volumetric Blood Flow (ml/Sec) in Intracranial Vessels.The flow change in collateral vesselNo change17 Participants
GinsengThe Changes in Volumetric Blood Flow (ml/Sec) in Intracranial Vessels.The flow change in steno-occlusive lesionAggravated7 Participants
PlaceboThe Changes in Volumetric Blood Flow (ml/Sec) in Intracranial Vessels.The flow change in collateral vesselAggravated8 Participants
PlaceboThe Changes in Volumetric Blood Flow (ml/Sec) in Intracranial Vessels.The flow change in steno-occlusive lesionNo change18 Participants
PlaceboThe Changes in Volumetric Blood Flow (ml/Sec) in Intracranial Vessels.The flow change in steno-occlusive lesionAggravated1 Participants
PlaceboThe Changes in Volumetric Blood Flow (ml/Sec) in Intracranial Vessels.The flow change in collateral vesselNo change9 Participants
PlaceboThe Changes in Volumetric Blood Flow (ml/Sec) in Intracranial Vessels.The flow change in collateral vesselImproved7 Participants
PlaceboThe Changes in Volumetric Blood Flow (ml/Sec) in Intracranial Vessels.The flow change in steno-occlusive lesionImproved5 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no relationship between ginseng administration and flow change in steno-occlusive lesion.p-value: 0.13Fisher Exact
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no relationship between ginseng administration and flow change in collateral vessel.p-value: 0.17Chi-squared
Secondary

The Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.

The changes of white matter hyperintensities, assessed by the Fazekas scale using brain magnetic resonance imaging. The Fazekas scale is a 4 point white matter disease severity scale with values ranging from 0 to 3. It quantifies the amount of white matter T2 hyperintense lesions each in periventricular white matter and deep white matter. Higher scales mean a worse white matter status. In the region of the periventricular white matter, 0 means absence of the lesion; 1, caps or pencil-thin lining lesion; 2, smooth halo lesion; 3, irregular high intense signal extending into the deep shite matter. In the region of the deep white matter, 0 means absence of the lesion; 1, punctate foci lesions; 2, beginning confluence; 3, large confluent hyperintense areas.

Time frame: At randomization and twelve months after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GinsengThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Periventricular white matterFazekas scale 19 Participants
GinsengThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Deep white matterFazekas scale 09 Participants
GinsengThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Periventricular white matterFazekas scale 215 Participants
GinsengThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Periventricular white matterFazekas scale 32 Participants
GinsengThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Deep white matterFazekas scale 115 Participants
GinsengThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Deep white matterFazekas scale 31 Participants
GinsengThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Periventricular white matterFazekas scale 02 Participants
GinsengThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Deep white matterFazekas scale 23 Participants
PlaceboThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Periventricular white matterFazekas scale 111 Participants
PlaceboThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Periventricular white matterFazekas scale 32 Participants
PlaceboThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Deep white matterFazekas scale 06 Participants
PlaceboThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Deep white matterFazekas scale 22 Participants
PlaceboThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Deep white matterFazekas scale 31 Participants
PlaceboThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Periventricular white matterFazekas scale 210 Participants
PlaceboThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Deep white matterFazekas scale 115 Participants
PlaceboThe Changes of White Matter Hyperintensities.Periventricular white matterFazekas scale 01 Participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no relationship between ginseng administration and periventricular white matter lesions at follow-up.p-value: 0.74Fisher Exact
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no relationship between ginseng administration and deep white matter lesions at follow-up.p-value: 0.95Fisher Exact
Other Pre-specified

Drug Compliance

We calculated average drug compliance based on the number of remained drugs at each follow-up.

Time frame: At twelve months after randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GinsengDrug Compliance97.4 percentage of drug complianceStandard Deviation 4.7
PlaceboDrug Compliance97.8 percentage of drug complianceStandard Deviation 4.3
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no relationship between ginseng administration and drug compliance at follow-up.p-value: 0.79Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026