Skip to content

A Randomized Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Everolimus-eluting Metallic Stent in Long Coronary Lesions

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02796157
Enrollment
950
Registered
2016-06-10
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
2019-05-31
Last updated
2018-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

bioresorbable vascular scaffold, drug eluting stent, coronary artery disease

Brief summary

PCI of diffuse long coronary lesions still remains challenging because of relatively high risk of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis compared to short coronary lesions. The purpose of the study is to compare an incidence of composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at 1 year between Absorb everolimus-eluting BVS and Xience EES after coronary intervention in long lesions.

Interventions

DEVICEPCI with Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold

Patients allocated to this arm will undergone PCI with Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold. It will be allowed to used multiple stents for a long coronary lesion.

DEVICEPCI with Xience everolimus-eluting metallic stent

Patients allocated to this arm will undergone PCI with Xience everolimus-eluting metallic stent. It will be allowed to used multiple stents for a long coronary lesion.

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 19-85 years * Patients with ischemic heart disease requiring PCI * Significant coronary de novo lesion (stenosis \>50% by quantitative angiographic analysis) requiring stent ≥28 mm in length based on angiographic estimation * Reference vessel diameter of 2.5 to 3.75 mm by operator assessment

Exclusion criteria

* Acute myocardial infarction within 48 hours with unstable hemodynamics requiring pharmacologic or mechanical support * Complex coronary morphology including left main disease and bifurcation lesion requiring two-stent technique * Contraindication or hypersensitivity to anti-platelet agents or contrast media * Treated with any metallic stent or BVS within 3 months at other vessel * Cardiogenic shock * Left ventricular ejection fraction \<40% * Pregnant women or women with potential childbearing * Inability to follow the patient over the period of 1 year after enrollment, as assessed by the investigator * Inability to understand or read the informed content

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of composite of major adverse cardiovascular events1 year after PCICardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis and target-lesion revascularization (TLR)

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026