Skip to content

Hallmarks of Protective Immunity in Sequential Rhinovirus Infections in Humans

Hallmarks of Protective Immunity in Sequential Rhinovirus Infections in Humans

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02796001
Enrollment
46
Registered
2016-06-10
Start date
2017-09-25
Completion date
2020-05-01
Last updated
2022-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Volunteers

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the relationship between rhinovirus specific T-cell immunity and the human host response to primary rhinovirus challenge and subsequent secondary challenge with either homologous or heterologous rhinovirus serotypes.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to assess the relationship between RV-specific T-cell immunity and the human host response to primary RV challenge and subsequent secondary challenge with either homologous or heterologous RV serotypes. The overall hypothesis that will be addressed by the mechanistic studies in this proposal is that T helper (Th) and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells directed against conserved RV epitopes expand upon RV exposure and some of these cells persist as stable cross-reactive memory populations capable of displaying lineage-specific protective functions upon re-infection with related or unrelated strains of RV. The human specimens collected in this study will be analyzed with a variety of state-of-the-art techniques to provide an in depth description of T-cell responses to RV infection, and the correlation of these responses with viral infection, antibody responses, and illness. Beyond this objective, by using a systems biology approach, we aim to gain new insight into the role of diverse cell types involved in adaptive immunity to RV. .

Interventions

BIOLOGICALhuman rhinovirus

human rhinovirus

OTHERno intervention

4 volunteers were not re-challenged and did not participate in the second challenge

Sponsors

University of Virginia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Volunteers who were infected with RV16 by experimental challenge were eligible for participation by re-challenge with either RV16 or RV39 to assess the host response to homologous or heterologous rechallenge.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject must be 18-40 years of age 2. Subject must read and sign a copy of the approved Consent Form 3. Subject must have a serum neutralizing antibody titer of ≤1:2 to rhinovirus type 39 and rhinovirus type 16 4. Female subjects must be using an effective birth control method. 5. Total IgE \<150 IU/ml.

Exclusion criteria

1. Any clinically significant abnormalities of the upper respiratory tract 2. Any clinically significant acute or chronic respiratory illness 3. Any clinically significant bleeding tendency by history 4. Hypertension that requires treatment with antihypertensive medications 5. History of angina or other clinically significant cardiac disease 6. Any upper respiratory infection or allergic rhinitis in the two weeks prior to the start of the study 7. Any medical condition that in the opinion of the Investigator is cause for exclusion from the study 8. Use of any anti-inflammatory (steroids or NSAIDs) or cough/cold preparation in the 1 month prior to the study 9. Regular use of tobacco in the last 6 months (ie. more than 2 days out of 7) or inability to refrain from smoking during the study 10. Inability to refrain from the use of common cold therapies in the 5 days after each rhinovirus challenge. 11. Participation in any other clinical drug trial in the month prior to the study 12. Female subjects with a positive urine pregnancy screen.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Virus InfectionVolunteers were cultured daily for detection of virus shedding for 5 days after the virus re-challenge and serum was collected for viral serology 4 weeks after virus re-challengeNumber infected after re-challenge with RV16 compared to RV39 as determined by virus isolation in cell culture or viral serology

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Volunteers who participated in the study were individuals who had previously been challenged and infected with RV16 in the human rhinovirus experimental challenge model and agreed to be re-challenged with either RV16 or RV39

Pre-assignment details

Volunteers were initially challenged with RV16 to provide a uniform baseline for the subsequent randomization and re-challenge with either a homologous serotype (RV16) or a heterologous serotype (RV39). 46 subjects met the baseline criteria but 3 declined further participation and 1 was ill on the day of re-challenge and was removed from the study by the investigator. 42 subjects were randomized and re-challenged with rhinovirus.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RV16 Infected Volunteers Re-challenged With RV16
volunteers re-challenged with RV16 human rhinovirus: human rhinovirus
20
RV16 Infected Volunteers Re-challenged With RV39
volunteers re-challenged with RV39 human rhinovirus: human rhinovirus
22
no Intervention
4 volunteers were infected with RV16 and were eligible for re-challenge. Three volunteers declined re-challenge and one was removed from the study prior to re-challenge
4
Total46

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRV16 Infected Volunteers Re-challenged With RV16RV16 Infected Volunteers Re-challenged With RV39no InterventionTotal
Age, Continuous20.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.43
19.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.87
19.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
20.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.91
previously infected with RV1620 Participants22 Participants4 Participants46 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants19 Participants3 Participants37 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants22 participants4 participants46 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants10 Participants2 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants12 Participants2 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 460 / 200 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 461 / 201 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 460 / 200 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Virus Infection

Number infected after re-challenge with RV16 compared to RV39 as determined by virus isolation in cell culture or viral serology

Time frame: Volunteers were cultured daily for detection of virus shedding for 5 days after the virus re-challenge and serum was collected for viral serology 4 weeks after virus re-challenge

Population: all volunteers re-challenged

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RV16 Infected Volunteers Re-challenged With RV16Virus Infection8 Participants
RV16 Infected Volunteers Re-challenged With RV39Virus Infection18 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026