Skip to content

Fuji Type VII Sealant Versus Resin Based Sealant. A Clinical Trial

Fuji Type VII Sealants Versus Resin Based Sealants. A Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02795728
Enrollment
120
Registered
2016-06-10
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2011-03-31
Last updated
2016-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Brief summary

Purpose: To evaluate the retention and caries preventive effect of the glass-ionomer fissure sealants and resin-based fissure sealant. Materials and Methods: Using a split mouth design ,a double blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to compare the retention and the caries preventive effect of light cure resin base sealant (3M ESPE) and Glass ionomer sealant (FUJI). The study comprised of 120 government school children of 7-9 years age group. The glass-ionomer sealant and resin-based sealant were applied randomly on either side of the first mandibular permanent molars. They were recalled for assessment of sealant retention at intervals of 3, 6 and 12 months.

Interventions

OTHERApplication of the GIC based sealant

Application of the GIC based sealant was carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Application of the resin based sealant on the occlusal surfaces was carried out as per the manufacturer s recommendations.

Sponsors

Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 9 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Children with a fully erupted contra lateral permanent mandibular first molars with well-defined deep pits and fissures and molars free of mucosal tissue are included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Molars with developmental anomalies, hypoplastic teeth were promptly excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Retention of the sealantBaseline to 1 yearRetention of the sealants will be assessed by using the Simensons criteria

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Caries incidenceBaseline to 1 year

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026