Skip to content

Improving Reproductive Health for Women in Opioid Medication-Assisted Treatment (OMAT)

Improving Reproductive Health for Women in Opioid Medication-Assisted Treatment (OMAT)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02794597
Enrollment
119
Registered
2016-06-09
Start date
2016-08-31
Completion date
2019-08-31
Last updated
2020-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Contraception

Keywords

Unplanned Pregnancy, long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), medications for opioid use disorder

Brief summary

Recent research suggests that women with substance use disorders may be at a higher risk of unintended pregnancy. There is a paucity of interventions specifically focused on this population. Through using mixed methods, this study proposes to develop a brief peer-led intervention (based on the Health Belief Model) to prevent unintended pregnancies among women entering opioid medication-assisted treatment; to assess acceptability, feasibility and the initial efficacy of the behavioral intervention; and to conduct exploratory analyses to identify the Health Belief Model constructs that are most influential on use of long-acting reversible contraception methods. Future research would include testing the intervention in a larger scale trial and with other populations.

Detailed description

This study aims to develop a reproductive health intervention to prevent unintended pregnancy for women of child-bearing age in opioid medication-assisted treatment (OMAT). It will be conducted in two phases. The first formative phase will employ individual interviews and focus groups with women between the ages of 18 and 44 and in opioid medication-assisted treatment to better understand: pregnancy desires/motivation and perceived susceptibility and severity, contraceptive knowledge, perceived benefits/barriers, self-efficacy, social norms, behaviors, and access to contraception and family planning services, especially related to long-acting reversible contraception. This information, coupled with prior evidence and theory, will be used to develop a brief peer-led behavioral intervention. In the second phase, we will conduct a randomized controlled trial to assess the acceptability, feasibility and the initial efficacy of the developed intervention. Women will be recruited from two opioid medication-assisted treatment facilities and once they have consented and the baseline survey is completed they will be randomized to either the behavioral intervention or usual care. Participants will complete a baseline, three and six-month post-baseline follow up survey. For those randomized to the intervention arm, the first session will occur immediately post-consent and baseline, and the second will occur 2-4 weeks post-baseline. A trained peer-educator will deliver the behavioral intervention that will provide accurate, unbiased information about Long Acting Reversible Contraception (intrauterine devices and subdermal implants) and all other contraceptive methods (including effectiveness, advantages, and disadvantages), help women assess their needs (pregnancy desires compared to behavior), and utilize motivational interviewing to empower them to make an informed decision regarding their sexual health. For those that are interested, the peer-educator will connect women to a Denver Health Community Health Clinic or a clinic of their choosing to further explore appropriate birth control methods. The medical clinic will assess the woman and determine and dispense the most appropriate method.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSHINE intervention group

Includes all substance treatment services as well as the brief peer-led behavioral intervention focused on contraceptives, reproductive needs, and motivational interviewing: Sexual Health Initiative for Navigation and Empowerment (SHINE).

Sponsors

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
Denver Health and Hospital Authority
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 44 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Biologically female * 18-44 years of age * receiving medications for opioid use disorder at one of two clinic sites * not currently pregnant or trying to become pregnant and having no known medical reason that could prevent pregnancy * having sex or intending to have sex with a biological male * not currently using a LARC method.

Exclusion criteria

* Being too intoxicated at the time of the interview or impaired mentally due to physical or psychological problems to the point that they cannot voluntarily consent to participate in the study and/or respond to the interview * Have a known reason why they will not be available for the intervention or the follow-up interview.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Family Planning Visit and Long-acting Reversible Contraception Use at Three and Six Month Follow-up by Condition.3 and 6 monthsAssess initial efficacy (family planning/clinical visits and uptake of birth control, specifically long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) of the SHINE intervention, using baseline/follow up surveys and review of medical records at three and six months. Specifically, the number of participants that were using LARCs and the number of participants who had attended family visits at each time point.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sexual Health Knowledge at 3 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.3 monthsAssess the impact of the SHINE intervention on overall sexual and reproductive health knowledge at 3 month follow-up (based on participants who completed the 3 month follow-up survey). Reported as percentage of questions answered correctly by participants.
Sexual Health Knowledge at 6 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.6 monthsAssess the impact of the SHINE intervention on overall sexual and reproductive health knowledge at 6 month follow-up (based on participants who completed the 6 month follow-up survey). Reported as percentage of questions answered correctly by participants.
Health Belief Model Constructs (Perceived Threat of Pregnancy) at Baseline by Intervention Condition.BaselineAssess the impact of the SHINE intervention on perceived threat of pregnancy at baseline (based on participants who completed the baseline survey). Reported as number of participants who indicated agreement with the statement, If I do not use birth control and have unprotected sex, I could get pregnant.
Health Belief Model Constructs (Perceived Threat of Pregnancy) at 3 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.3 monthsAssess the impact of the SHINE intervention on perceived threat of pregnancy at 3 month follow-up (based on participants who completed the 3 month follow-up survey). Reported as number of participants who indicated agreement with the statement, If I do not use birth control and have unprotected sex, I could get pregnant.
Sexual Health Knowledge at Baseline by Intervention Condition.BaselineAssess the impact of the SHINE intervention on overall sexual and reproductive health knowledge at baseline (based on participants who completed the baseline survey). Reported as percentage of questions answered correctly by participants.
Health Belief Model Constructs (Contraceptive Cost-benefit) at Baseline by Intervention Condition.baselineAssess the impact of the SHINE intervention on contraceptive cost-benefit at baseline (based on participants who completed the baseline survey). Perceived contraceptive costs and benefits were assessed with 14 items on a five-point scale describing how strongly participants agreed to each statement. The response scale was coded so that a higher score reflected higher benefits and lower costs and was the desired direction over time. Reported as mean overall score (range 0-56).
Health Belief Model Constructs (Contraceptive Cost-benefit) at 3 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.3 monthsAssess the impact of the SHINE intervention on contraceptive cost-benefit at 3 month follow-up (based on participants who completed the 3 month follow-up survey). Perceived contraceptive costs and benefits were assessed with 14 items on a five-point scale describing how strongly participants agreed to each statement. The response scale was coded so that a higher score reflected higher benefits and lower costs and was the desired direction over time. Reported as mean overall score (range 0-56).
Health Belief Model Constructs (Contraceptive Cost-benefit) at 6 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.6 monthsAssess the impact of the SHINE intervention on contraceptive cost-benefit at 6 month follow-up (based on participants who completed the 6 month follow-up survey). Perceived contraceptive costs and benefits were assessed with 14 items on a five-point scale describing how strongly participants agreed to each statement. The response scale was coded so that a higher score reflected higher benefits and lower costs and was the desired direction over time. Reported as mean overall score (range 0-56).
Health Belief Model Constructs (Perceived Threat of Pregnancy) at 6 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.6 monthsAssess the impact of the SHINE intervention on perceived threat of pregnancy at 6 month follow-up (based on participants who completed the 6 month follow-up survey). Reported as the number of participants who indicated agreement with the statement, If I do not use birth control and have unprotected sex, I could get pregnant.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Usual Care - Opioid Medication Assisted Treatment
The current standard of care for patients at these clinics is to conduct point-of-care urine pregnancy testing at treatment intake and refer positives for follow-up and clinical care. At the time of the study, neither program had standard work in place to assess pregnancy desire or contraceptive use, nor to provide information on contraceptive methods or referral to FP services.
63
Intervention
Peer-led, behavioral sexual health intervention Intervention: a brief peer-led behavioral intervention focused on contraceptives, reproductive needs, and motivational interviewing.
56
Total119

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUsual Care - Opioid Medication Assisted TreatmentInterventionTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
63 Participants56 Participants119 Participants
Age, Continuous32.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
32.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
32.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants15 Participants31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
47 Participants41 Participants88 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants8 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
57 Participants42 Participants99 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
63 Participants56 Participants119 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
63 Participants56 Participants119 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 630 / 56
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 630 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 630 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

Family Planning Visit and Long-acting Reversible Contraception Use at Three and Six Month Follow-up by Condition.

Assess initial efficacy (family planning/clinical visits and uptake of birth control, specifically long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) of the SHINE intervention, using baseline/follow up surveys and review of medical records at three and six months. Specifically, the number of participants that were using LARCs and the number of participants who had attended family visits at each time point.

Time frame: 3 and 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual Care - Opioid Medication Assisted TreatmentFamily Planning Visit and Long-acting Reversible Contraception Use at Three and Six Month Follow-up by Condition.3 month LARC use (# of participants)2 Participants
Usual Care - Opioid Medication Assisted TreatmentFamily Planning Visit and Long-acting Reversible Contraception Use at Three and Six Month Follow-up by Condition.6 month LARC use (# of participants; inclusive of entire 6 month period)2 Participants
Usual Care - Opioid Medication Assisted TreatmentFamily Planning Visit and Long-acting Reversible Contraception Use at Three and Six Month Follow-up by Condition.Family planning visits at 3 months (# of participants who had a visit)8 Participants
Usual Care - Opioid Medication Assisted TreatmentFamily Planning Visit and Long-acting Reversible Contraception Use at Three and Six Month Follow-up by Condition.Family planning visits at 6 months (# who had a visit; inclusive of entire 6 month period)9 Participants
InterventionFamily Planning Visit and Long-acting Reversible Contraception Use at Three and Six Month Follow-up by Condition.Family planning visits at 6 months (# who had a visit; inclusive of entire 6 month period)20 Participants
InterventionFamily Planning Visit and Long-acting Reversible Contraception Use at Three and Six Month Follow-up by Condition.3 month LARC use (# of participants)7 Participants
InterventionFamily Planning Visit and Long-acting Reversible Contraception Use at Three and Six Month Follow-up by Condition.Family planning visits at 3 months (# of participants who had a visit)17 Participants
InterventionFamily Planning Visit and Long-acting Reversible Contraception Use at Three and Six Month Follow-up by Condition.6 month LARC use (# of participants; inclusive of entire 6 month period)7 Participants
Secondary

Health Belief Model Constructs (Contraceptive Cost-benefit) at 3 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.

Assess the impact of the SHINE intervention on contraceptive cost-benefit at 3 month follow-up (based on participants who completed the 3 month follow-up survey). Perceived contraceptive costs and benefits were assessed with 14 items on a five-point scale describing how strongly participants agreed to each statement. The response scale was coded so that a higher score reflected higher benefits and lower costs and was the desired direction over time. Reported as mean overall score (range 0-56).

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Participants who completed the 3 month follow-up survey

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care - Opioid Medication Assisted TreatmentHealth Belief Model Constructs (Contraceptive Cost-benefit) at 3 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.37.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
InterventionHealth Belief Model Constructs (Contraceptive Cost-benefit) at 3 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.40.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Secondary

Health Belief Model Constructs (Contraceptive Cost-benefit) at 6 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.

Assess the impact of the SHINE intervention on contraceptive cost-benefit at 6 month follow-up (based on participants who completed the 6 month follow-up survey). Perceived contraceptive costs and benefits were assessed with 14 items on a five-point scale describing how strongly participants agreed to each statement. The response scale was coded so that a higher score reflected higher benefits and lower costs and was the desired direction over time. Reported as mean overall score (range 0-56).

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Participants who completed the 6 month follow-up survey

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care - Opioid Medication Assisted TreatmentHealth Belief Model Constructs (Contraceptive Cost-benefit) at 6 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.38.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
InterventionHealth Belief Model Constructs (Contraceptive Cost-benefit) at 6 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.41.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Secondary

Health Belief Model Constructs (Contraceptive Cost-benefit) at Baseline by Intervention Condition.

Assess the impact of the SHINE intervention on contraceptive cost-benefit at baseline (based on participants who completed the baseline survey). Perceived contraceptive costs and benefits were assessed with 14 items on a five-point scale describing how strongly participants agreed to each statement. The response scale was coded so that a higher score reflected higher benefits and lower costs and was the desired direction over time. Reported as mean overall score (range 0-56).

Time frame: baseline

Population: Participants who completed the baseline survey

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care - Opioid Medication Assisted TreatmentHealth Belief Model Constructs (Contraceptive Cost-benefit) at Baseline by Intervention Condition.37.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
InterventionHealth Belief Model Constructs (Contraceptive Cost-benefit) at Baseline by Intervention Condition.35.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
Secondary

Health Belief Model Constructs (Perceived Threat of Pregnancy) at 3 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.

Assess the impact of the SHINE intervention on perceived threat of pregnancy at 3 month follow-up (based on participants who completed the 3 month follow-up survey). Reported as number of participants who indicated agreement with the statement, If I do not use birth control and have unprotected sex, I could get pregnant.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Participants who completed the 3 month follow-up survey

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual Care - Opioid Medication Assisted TreatmentHealth Belief Model Constructs (Perceived Threat of Pregnancy) at 3 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.42 Participants
InterventionHealth Belief Model Constructs (Perceived Threat of Pregnancy) at 3 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.34 Participants
Secondary

Health Belief Model Constructs (Perceived Threat of Pregnancy) at 6 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.

Assess the impact of the SHINE intervention on perceived threat of pregnancy at 6 month follow-up (based on participants who completed the 6 month follow-up survey). Reported as the number of participants who indicated agreement with the statement, If I do not use birth control and have unprotected sex, I could get pregnant.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Participants who completed the 6 month follow-up survey

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual Care - Opioid Medication Assisted TreatmentHealth Belief Model Constructs (Perceived Threat of Pregnancy) at 6 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.44 Participants
InterventionHealth Belief Model Constructs (Perceived Threat of Pregnancy) at 6 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.37 Participants
Secondary

Health Belief Model Constructs (Perceived Threat of Pregnancy) at Baseline by Intervention Condition.

Assess the impact of the SHINE intervention on perceived threat of pregnancy at baseline (based on participants who completed the baseline survey). Reported as number of participants who indicated agreement with the statement, If I do not use birth control and have unprotected sex, I could get pregnant.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Participants who completed the baseline survey

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual Care - Opioid Medication Assisted TreatmentHealth Belief Model Constructs (Perceived Threat of Pregnancy) at Baseline by Intervention Condition.59 Participants
InterventionHealth Belief Model Constructs (Perceived Threat of Pregnancy) at Baseline by Intervention Condition.52 Participants
Secondary

Sexual Health Knowledge at 3 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.

Assess the impact of the SHINE intervention on overall sexual and reproductive health knowledge at 3 month follow-up (based on participants who completed the 3 month follow-up survey). Reported as percentage of questions answered correctly by participants.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Participants who completed the 3 month follow-up survey

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Usual Care - Opioid Medication Assisted TreatmentSexual Health Knowledge at 3 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.81.6 percentage of correct responses
InterventionSexual Health Knowledge at 3 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.81.9 percentage of correct responses
Secondary

Sexual Health Knowledge at 6 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.

Assess the impact of the SHINE intervention on overall sexual and reproductive health knowledge at 6 month follow-up (based on participants who completed the 6 month follow-up survey). Reported as percentage of questions answered correctly by participants.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Participants who completed the 6 month follow-up survey

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Usual Care - Opioid Medication Assisted TreatmentSexual Health Knowledge at 6 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.81.8 percentage of correct responses
InterventionSexual Health Knowledge at 6 Month Follow-up by Intervention Condition.83.5 percentage of correct responses
Secondary

Sexual Health Knowledge at Baseline by Intervention Condition.

Assess the impact of the SHINE intervention on overall sexual and reproductive health knowledge at baseline (based on participants who completed the baseline survey). Reported as percentage of questions answered correctly by participants.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Participants who completed the baseline survey

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Usual Care - Opioid Medication Assisted TreatmentSexual Health Knowledge at Baseline by Intervention Condition.78.4 percentage of correct responses
InterventionSexual Health Knowledge at Baseline by Intervention Condition.76.2 percentage of correct responses

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026