Skip to content

Chemoprevention of Gastric Carcinogenesis

Targeted Chemoprevention of Gastric Carcinogenesis in High Risk Populations

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02794428
Enrollment
91
Registered
2016-06-09
Start date
2016-09-19
Completion date
2024-07-01
Last updated
2024-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric Cancer, Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia

Keywords

Gastric adenocarcinoma, Gastric intestinal metaplasia, Atrophic gastritis, Gastric premalignant lesion

Brief summary

A clinical study of the efficacy of oral alpha-difluoromethylornithine (eflornithine or DFMO) in male and female subjects ages 30-60 with gastric premalignant lesions in two high risk regions of Latin America.

Detailed description

Primary Objective \- The difference in cell DNA damage between patients treated with DFMO and patients treated with placebo at 6 months. The cell DNA damage is measured using the percent positive gastric epithelial cells assessed by IHC for gamma H2AX. The mean difference between the two groups at 6 months will be calculated, accounting for their baseline measurements. Secondary Objectives * The difference in cell DNA damage between patients treated with DFMO and patients treated with placebo for 18 months, and then followed for an additional 6 months. The cell DNA damage is measured using the percent positive gastric epithelial cells assessed by IHC for gamma H2AX. The mean difference between the two groups at 18 and 24 months will be calculated, accounting for their baseline measurements. * The differences in the gastritis histopathology score between patients treated with DFMO and patients treated with placebo for a total of 18 months, and followed for an additional 6 months. The gastritis histopathology score is measured with a quantitative scale 0.0-6.0, for atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and dysplasia. The mean differences between the two groups at 6, 18, and 24 months will be calculated using mixed models, accounting for their baseline measurements. * Number of patients with quantitative toxicities. Toxicities will be assessed per CTCAE criteria, and each toxicity will be assigned an adverse event (AE) term according to CTCAE definitions (each AE term = unique representation of a specific event used for medical documentation and scientific analyses), and graded as defined by CTCAE (grade 1 = mild; grade 2 = moderate; grade 3 = severe or significant but not immediately life-threatening; grade 4 = life-threatening; grade 5 = death). * To evaluate whether candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) relevant to eflornithine (DFMO) efficacy.

Interventions

Eflornithine\*, 2 tablets, Oral, Daily for 18 months

Eflornithine placebo, 2 tablets, Oral, Daily for 18 months

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Cancer Prevention Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must have a history of a premalignant lesion of the stomach, atrophic gastritis or intestinal metaplasia * Patients must have a pure tone audiometry evaluation to document air conduction within 60 days prior to randomization. * Patients must have adequate blood counts as evidenced by the following results (obtained within 60 days): * Blood counts: WBC ≥4.0 /mcL, platelets ≥100,000 /mcL and hemoglobin ≥11.0 g/dL * Kidney function: Creatinine \<1.6 x IULN (institutional upper limit of normal) * Liver function tests: Bilirubin ≤2.0 mg/dL and AST (SGOT) or ALT (SGPT) ≤2 x IULN

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with dysplasia (indeterminate, low grade, high grade) are not eligible for participation * Patients must not have a significant medical or psychiatric condition that would preclude study completion. * Patients with hearing loss ≥30 dB in any of the tested frequencies (250 Hz, 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, 2,000 Hz, 4,000 Hz, 8,000 Hz) are not eligible. * Patients must not have known hypersensitivity to eflornithine or the excipients. * Patients must not be receiving corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or anticoagulants on a regular or intermittent basis. * Patients must not have a significant cardiovascular disease history, including uncontrolled blood pressure (sBP \> 150 mmHg), myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, or heart failure (New York Heart Association Class III, or IV). * Patients must not have a history of gastric or esophageal cancer, gastric resection or surgery, peptic ulcer disease (within 6 months), H. pylori treatment (within 6 months), or inflammatory bowel disease. * No prior malignancy is allowed except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or other cancer for which the patient has been disease-free for \>5 years. * Patients must not be receiving corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or anticoagulants on a regular or intermittent basis. * Patients must not be pregnant or nursing (due to eflornithine pregnancy class C). Women and men of reproductive potential must have agreed to use an effective contraceptive method.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Difference in Cell DNA Damage, Based on Percent Positive Cells, Between Patients Treated With DFMO and Patients Treated With Placebo at 6 Months.at 6 monthsThe cell DNA damage is measured using the percent positive gastric epithelial cells assessed by IHC for gamma H2AX.The mean difference between the two groups at 6 months will be calculated, accounting for their baseline measurements.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Difference in Cell DNA Damage Between Patients Treated With DFMO and Patients Treated With Placebo for 18 Months, and Then Followed for an Additional 6 Months.at 18 and 24 monthsThe cell DNA damage is measured using the percent positive gastric epithelial cells assessed by IHC for gamma H2AX. The mean difference between the two groups at 18 and 24 months will be calculated, accounting for their baseline measurements.
The Differences in the Gastritis Histopathology Score Between Patients Treated With DFMO and Patients Treated With Placebo for a Total of 18 Months, and Followed for an Additional 6 Months.at 6, 18 and 24 monthsThe gastritis histopathology score is measured with a quantitative scale 0.0-6.0, for atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and dysplasia. The mean differences between the two groups at 6, 18, and 24 months will be calculated using mixed models, accounting for their baseline measurements.
Number of Patients With Quantitative Toxicities.at 6, 18, and 24 monthsToxicities will be assessed per CTCAE criteria, and each toxicity will be assigned an adverse event (AE) term according to CTCAE definitions (each AE term = unique representation of a specific event used for medical documentation and scientific analyses), and graded as defined by CTCAE (grade 1 = mild; grade 2 = moderate; grade 3 = severe or significant but not immediately life-threatening; grade 4 = life-threatening; grade 5 = death).

Countries

Honduras, Puerto Rico

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Eflornithine
Eflornithine: Eflornithine\*, 2 tablets, Oral, Daily for 18 months
45
Eflornithine Placebo
Eflornithine placebo: Eflornithine placebo, 2 tablets, Oral, Daily for 18 months
46
Total91

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEflornithineEflornithine PlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
45 Participants45 Participants90 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
45 Participants46 Participants91 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
45 Participants46 Participants91 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Honduras
43 participants43 participants86 participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants33 Participants67 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants13 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 450 / 46
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 453 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 452 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

The Difference in Cell DNA Damage, Based on Percent Positive Cells, Between Patients Treated With DFMO and Patients Treated With Placebo at 6 Months.

The cell DNA damage is measured using the percent positive gastric epithelial cells assessed by IHC for gamma H2AX.The mean difference between the two groups at 6 months will be calculated, accounting for their baseline measurements.

Time frame: at 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EflornithineThe Difference in Cell DNA Damage, Based on Percent Positive Cells, Between Patients Treated With DFMO and Patients Treated With Placebo at 6 Months.5.07 Percentage of positive cellsStandard Deviation 21.05
Eflornithine PlaceboThe Difference in Cell DNA Damage, Based on Percent Positive Cells, Between Patients Treated With DFMO and Patients Treated With Placebo at 6 Months.7.32 Percentage of positive cellsStandard Deviation 21.6
Secondary

Number of Patients With Quantitative Toxicities.

Toxicities will be assessed per CTCAE criteria, and each toxicity will be assigned an adverse event (AE) term according to CTCAE definitions (each AE term = unique representation of a specific event used for medical documentation and scientific analyses), and graded as defined by CTCAE (grade 1 = mild; grade 2 = moderate; grade 3 = severe or significant but not immediately life-threatening; grade 4 = life-threatening; grade 5 = death).

Time frame: at 6, 18, and 24 months

Secondary

The Difference in Cell DNA Damage Between Patients Treated With DFMO and Patients Treated With Placebo for 18 Months, and Then Followed for an Additional 6 Months.

The cell DNA damage is measured using the percent positive gastric epithelial cells assessed by IHC for gamma H2AX. The mean difference between the two groups at 18 and 24 months will be calculated, accounting for their baseline measurements.

Time frame: at 18 and 24 months

Secondary

The Differences in the Gastritis Histopathology Score Between Patients Treated With DFMO and Patients Treated With Placebo for a Total of 18 Months, and Followed for an Additional 6 Months.

The gastritis histopathology score is measured with a quantitative scale 0.0-6.0, for atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and dysplasia. The mean differences between the two groups at 6, 18, and 24 months will be calculated using mixed models, accounting for their baseline measurements.

Time frame: at 6, 18 and 24 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026