Skip to content

TACE vs TACE+SBRT for Unresectable Hepatocellular Cancer

Integrated Phase II/III Randomized Control Trial of Transarterial Chemoembolisation Alone or in Combination With Stereotactic Body Radiation in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02794337
Acronym
TACE-SBRT
Enrollment
67
Registered
2016-06-09
Start date
2014-12-31
Completion date
2024-01-31
Last updated
2022-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Brief summary

Vast majority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) present with unresectable disease. In the last decade results of randomized trials and a subsequent metaanalyses established transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or systemic chemotherapy (sorafenib) as standard of care. However, TACE alone is not a curative approach. The two year survival following TACE ranges from 31-63% with almost 100% patients developing disease progression after treatment. There is need to investigate additional therapeutic options that would consolidate the initial response to TACE. A recent metaanalyses concluded that addition of high dose radiation to TACE results in 10-35% improvement in two year overall survival. However as results of metaanalyses were based on studies with small sample size, unclear randomization procedure and heterogenous dose of radiation, the need for conducting a high quality randomized study was highlighted The present study is designed to investigate the role of high dose conformal radiation as consolidation therapy after TACE in patients with nonmetastatic unresectable HCC.

Detailed description

Resection or liver transplant is the only curative treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) however a vast majority of patients present with unresectable disease. In the last decade results of randomized trials and a subsequent metaanalyses established transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as standard of care in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B. However, TACE alone is not a curative approach. The two year survival following TACE ranges from 31-63% with almost 100% patients developing disease progression after treatment. There is need to investigate additional therapeutic options that would consolidate the initial response to TACE. A recent metaanalyses including 17 trials (5 randomized and 12 non randomized studies) concluded that addition of high dose radiation to TACE results in upto 10-35% improvement in two year overall survival. However as results of metaanalyses were based on studies with small sample size, unclear randomization procedure and heterogenous dose of radiation, the need for conducting a high quality randomized study was highlighted. The present study is designed to investigate the role of high dose conformal radiation as consolidation therapy after TACE in patients with nonmetastatic unresectable HCC. With an integrated phase II/III design the study investigates the impact of local radiation therapy on infield progression free survival in patients with locally advanced unresectable HCC.

Interventions

RADIATIONSBRT

Intervention involves administering high precision radiation to the tumour in 6-8 fractions over 2-2.5 weeks

PROCEDURETACE

Involves catheterization of the tumour feeding vessels and injecting 100 mg of doxorubicin drug eluting beads. Maximum 3 TACE procedures are done

DRUGSorafenib

Sorafenib will be initiated 2 weeks before 1st TACE at a dose considered appropriate by the treating clinician. Though 400 mg bid is the recommended dose a lower dose may be used as per the judgement of treating clinician. It will be omitted on the days of TACE and SBRT. Sorafenib will be reinitiated 4 weeks after SBRT completion and will continue to be administered till progression or 12 months whichever is earlier. Sorafenib can however be stopped in patients who fail to tolerate sorafenib even after dose modifications.

Sponsors

Tata Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of HCC. Tissue diagnosis is not mandatory however desirable. In the absence of tissue diagnosis imaging findings characteristic of HCC will be used. i.e. in high risk population a nodule with arterial phase enhancement and wash out during portovenous phase will be considered as diagnostic of HCC. In patients where one imaging is not conclusive another imaging modality will be used. However if second imaging is also inconclusive and Alpha Feto Protein (AFP) is within the nondiagnostic or borderline range than tissue diagnosis will be deemed mandatory. * Barcelona Stage B/ Barcelona A not deemed suitable for Sx or refuse surgery. Child Pugh A/Select Child Pugh B (score7/10). * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-1. * Total number of measurable target lesions 2 or less than 2, can be encompassed within a single hepatic field or 2 different hepatic fields without exceeding safe dose limit constraints. * Optimal predicted liver volume reserve \>700 cc. No Contraindication for TACE. Tumor considered to be sufficiently away from GI structures to deliver safe radiation dose (\>1 cm). * Willing for molecular banking of tumour tissue (optional).

Exclusion criteria

* Metastatic or nodal disease on staging investigations. * Child C Cirrhosis or previous history of liver failure. Expected life span \<6 months. * Active variceal bleeding or other signs of hepatic decompensation. * Portal venous thrombosis rendering patients unsuitable for TACE. However if pt is suitable for superselective TACE then can be considered for trial inclusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In-field Progression Free SurvivalUpto 24 monthsThe trial is designed to assess a benefit in in-field progression free survival. The principal investigator would assess the study results 24 months after last accrual.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cause Specific SurvivalUpto 24 monthsWill compare the cause specific survival between both the arms
Response assessment after treatmentUpto 24 monthsUsing modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors scoring, radiological response to treatment will be assessed between both the arms.
Quality of Life Assessment of patients over a period of timeUpto 24 monthsEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Study Group on Quality of Life has developed the Quality of life questionaires (QLQ) which are EORTC QLQ-C30 and the hepatocellular carcinoma specific EORTC QLQ-HCC 18 consisting in a modular system for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients in clinical research. EORTC QLQ-HCC 18 is an 18-item questionnaire designed to be used along with the 30-item EORTC QLQ-C30 Each item will be scored according to the EORTC guidelines
Toxicity AssessmentUpto 24 monthsAssessment will be done according to CTCAE v4.0

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactSupriya Chopra, MD
supriyasastri@gmail.com09930958309
Backup ContactSupriya Chopra, MD
schopra@actrec.gov.in09930958309

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026