Skip to content

HLA-Mismatched Unrelated Donor Bone Marrow Transplantation With Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide

A Multi-Center, Phase II Trial of HLA-Mismatched Unrelated Donor Bone Marrow Transplantation With Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02793544
Enrollment
80
Registered
2016-06-08
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2025-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia (ABL), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)/T Lymphoblastic Lymphoma, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML), Acute Undifferentiated Leukemia (AUL), Chemotherapy-sensitive Lymphoma, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Brief summary

This is a multi-center, single arm Phase II study of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched unrelated bone marrow transplantation donors and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Interventions

DRUGG-CSF

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF): filgrastim or a biosimilar begins on Day+5 at a dose of 5 mcg/kg/day (actual body weight) IV or subcutaneously (SC) (rounding to the nearest vial dose is allowed), until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) is ≥ 1,000/mm3 over the course of 3 consecutive days. Additional G-CSF may be administered as warranted.

DRUGPre-HCT Mesna on Days -6 and -5

Use of Mesna and dosing will be done according to institutional standards. A recommended approach is as follows: Mesna IV dose of ≥ 80% of the total daily dose of Cy and given in divided doses 30 minutes before and at 3, 6, and 8-9 hours after completion of Cy. Mesna is dosed according to adjusted IBW (Appendix K), unless the subject weighs less than IBW, in which case Mesna will be dosed according to actual weight.

DRUGPre-HCT Mesna on Days -2 and -1

Use of Mesna and dosing will be done according to institutional standards. A recommended approach is as follows: Mesna IV dose of ≥ 80% of the total daily dose of Cy and given in divided doses 30 minutes before and at 3, 6, and 8-9 hours after completion of Cy. Mesna is dosed according to adjusted IBW (Appendix K), unless the subject weighs less than IBW, in which case Mesna will be dosed according to actual weight.

DRUGPre-HCT Mesna on Days -5 and -4

Use of Mesna and dosing will be done according to institutional standards. A recommended approach is as follows: Mesna IV dose of ≥ 80% of the total daily dose of Cy and given in divided doses 30 minutes before and at 3, 6, and 8-9 hours after completion of Cy. Mesna is dosed according to adjusted IBW (Appendix K), unless the subject weighs less than IBW, in which case Mesna will be dosed according to actual weight.

DRUGPost-HCT Mesna

Mesna is required. Mesna IV dose must be ≥ 80% of the total daily dose of Cy and given in divided doses 30 minutes before and at 3, 6, and 8-9 hours after completion of Cy on Day+3 and Day+4. Mesna is dosed according to IBW, unless the subject weighs less than IBW, in which case Mesna will be dosed according to actual body weight.

DRUGFludarabine

* Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day (adjusted for renal function) is administered over a 30-60 minute IV infusion on Days -6 through -2 (maximum cumulative dose, 150 mg/m2). * The body surface area (BSA) for fludarabine dosing is based on adjusted ideal body weight (IBW) (Appendix K). * creatinine clearance may change during the days fludarabine is given. Adjustment in fludarabine dose due to creatinine changes during conditioning is permitted.

DRUGCyclophosphamide 14.5 mg/kg/day IV on Days -6, -5

* Cy 14.5 mg/kg/day is administered as a 1-2 hour IV infusion on Days -6 and -5 after hydration. * Use of Mesna and dosing will be done according to institutional standards. A recommended approach is as follows: Mesna IV dose of ≥ 80% of the total daily dose of Cy and given in divided doses 30 minutes before and at 3, 6, and 8-9 hours after completion of Cy. * Hydration prior to Cy may be given according to institutional guideline. * Cy and mesna are dosed according to adjusted IBW (Appendix K), unless the subject weighs less than IBW, in which case these drugs will be dosed according to actual weight.

RADIATIONTotal Body Irradiation (TBI) 200cGy on Day -1

* 200 cGy TBI is administered in a single fraction on Day -1. * Radiation sources, dose rates, and shielding follow institutional practice.

PROCEDUREInfusion of non-T-cell depleted bone marrow on Day 0

* On Day 0, the harvested bone marrow is infused. * Donor bone marrow will be harvested with a target yield of 4 x 108 nucleated cells/kg recipient weight. * The lowest acceptable nucleated cells yield is 1.5 x 108 cells/kg recipient weight.

DRUGBusulfan

* Busulfan ≥ 9mg/kg total dose (IV or PO) on Days -6, -5, -4, -3 (PK monitoring required to achieve a daily area under the curve (AUC) target of 4800-5300 μM\*min (Perkins et al., 2012)) * Busulfan dosing is based on adjusted IBW (Appendix K)

DRUGCyclophosphamide 50mg/kg/day IV on Days -2,-1

* Cy 50mg/kg/day is administered as a 1-2 hour IV infusion on Days -2 and -1 after hydration. * Use of Mesna and dosing will be done according to institutional standards. A recommended approach is as follows: Mesna IV dose of ≥ 80% of the total daily dose of Cy and given in divided doses 30 minutes before and at 3, 6, and 8-9 hours after completion of Cy. * Hydration prior to Cy may be given according to institutional guideline. * Cy and mesna are dosed according to adjusted IBW (Appendix K), unless the subject weighs less than IBW, in which case these drugs will be dosed according to actual weight.

DRUGCyclophosphamide 50mg/kg/day IV on Days -5,-4

* Cy 50mg/kg/day is administered as a 1-2 hour IV infusion on Days -5 and -4 after hydration. * Use of Mesna and dosing will be done according to institutional standards. A recommended approach is as follows: Mesna IV dose of ≥ 80% of the total daily dose of Cy and given in divided doses 30 minutes before and at 3, 6, and 8-9 hours after completion of Cy. * Hydration prior to Cy may be given according to institutional guideline. * Cy and mesna are dosed according to adjusted IBW (Appendix K), unless the subject weighs less than IBW, in which case these drugs will be dosed according to actual weight.

RADIATIONTotal Body Irradiation (TBI) 200cGy twice a day on Days -3, -2, -1

* 200cGy TBI is administered in twice daily on Days -3, -2, and -1. * Radiation sources, dose rates, and shielding follow institutional practice.

DRUGPost-HCT Cyclophosphamide 50mg/kg IV on Day+3, +4

* Cy 50mg/kg IV, over 1-2 hours (depending on volume), is given on Day+3 (ideally between 60 and 72 hours after bone marrow infusion) and on Day+4 (approximately 24 hours after Day+3 Cy). * Hydration with Cy, management of volume status, and monitoring for hemorrhagic cystitis will follow institutional standards. * Mesna is required. Mesna IV dose must be ≥ 80% of the total daily dose of Cy and given in divided doses 30 minutes before and at 3, 6, and 8-9 hours after completion of Cy. * Cy is dosed according to IBW, unless the subject weighs less than IBW, in which case these drugs will be dosed according to actual body weight.

DRUGSirolimus

* Sirolimus dosing is based on adjusted IBW (Appendix K). * Sirolimus prophylaxis is discontinued after the last dose on Day+180, or may be continued if there is GVHD. For subjects ≥ 18 years old: * A one-time sirolimus loading dose, 6 mg PO, is given on Day+5, at least 24 hours after Cy completion. * Sirolimus is then continued at a maintenance dose (starting dose 2 mg PO QD), with dose adjustments to maintain a trough of 5 - 15 ng/mL as measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or immunoassay. For subjects \< 18 years old: * A one-time sirolimus loading dose, 3 mg/m2 PO with the dose not to exceed 6 mg, is given on Day+5, at least 24 hours after Cy completion. * Sirolimus is then continued at a maintenance dose (starting dose 1 mg/m2 PO QD, maximum 2 mg PO QD), with dose adjustments to maintain a trough of 5 - 15 ng/mL as measured by HPLC or immunoassay.

DRUGMycophenolate mofetil

MMF begins on Day+5, at least 24 hours after completion of PTCy. MMF dose is 15 mg/kg PO TID (adjusted IBW (Appendix K)) with total daily dose not to exceed 3 grams (i.e. maximum 1 g PO TID). An equivalent IV dose (1:1 conversion) may instead be given. MMF prophylaxis is discontinued after the last dose on Day+35, or may be continued if there is GVHD.

Sponsors

National Marrow Donor Program
CollaboratorOTHER
Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 15 years and \< 71 years at the time of signing the informed consent form 2. Partially HLA-mismatched unrelated donor: HLA typing will be performed at high resolution (allele level) for the HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 loci; a minimum match of 4/8 at HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 is required 3. Product planned for infusion is bone marrow 4. Disease and disease status: 1. Acute Leukemias or T lymphoblastic lymphoma in 1st or subsequent complete remission (CR): Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)/T lymphoblastic lymphoma; acute myelogenous leukemia (AML); acute biphenotypic leukemia (ABL); acute undifferentiated leukemia (AUL) 2. Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), fulfilling the following criteria: Subjects with de novo MDS who have or have previously had Intermediate-2 or High risk disease as determined by the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). Current Intermediate-2 or High risk disease is not a requirement; Subjects must have \< 20% bone marrow blasts, assessed within 60 days of informed consent; Subjects may have received prior therapy for the treatment of MDS prior to enrollment 3. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) in CR if RIC is to be used; in CR or partial response (PR) if FIC is to be used 4. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in 1st or subsequent chronic phase characterized by \<10% blasts in the blood or bone marrow. 5. Chemotherapy-sensitive lymphoma in status other than 1st CR 5. Performance status: Karnofsky or Lansky score ≥ 60% (Appendix A) 6. Adequate organ function defined as: 1. Cardiac: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at rest ≥ 35% (RIC cohort) or LVEF at rest ≥ 40% (FIC cohort), or left ventricular shortening fraction (LVFS) ≥ 25% 2. Pulmonary: diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥ 50% predicted by pulmonary function tests (PFTs) 3. Hepatic: total bilirubin ≤ 2.5 mg/dL, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) \< 5 x upper limit of (ULN) (unless disease related) 4. Renal: serum creatinine (SCr) within normal range for age (see table 2.3). If SCr is outside normal range for age, creatinine clearance (CrCl) \> 40 mL/min/1.73m2 must be obtained (measured by 24-hour (hr) urine specimen or nuclear glomerular filtration rate (GFR), or calculated GFR (by Cockcroft-Gault formula for those aged ≥ 18 years; by Original Schwartz estimate for those \< 18 years)) 7. Subjects ≥ 18 years of age must have the ability to give informed consent according to applicable regulatory and local institutional requirements. Legal guardian permission must be obtained for subjects \< 18 years of age. Pediatric subjects will be included in age appropriate discussion in order to obtain assent. 8. Subjects with documentation of confirmed HIV-1 infection (i.e. HIV-positive), and a hematologic malignancy who meets all other eligibility requirements must: 1. Receive only RIC regimen (i.e. Regimen A) 2. Be willing to comply with effective antiretroviral therapy (ARV) 3. Have achieved a sustained virologic response for 12 weeks after cessation of hepatitis C antiviral treatment (in HIV-positive subjects with hepatitis C)

Exclusion criteria

1. HLA-matched related or 8/8 allele matched (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1) unrelated donor available. This exclusion does not apply to HIV-positive subjects who have a CCR5delta32 homozygous donor. 2. Autologous HCT \< 3 months prior to the time of signing the informed consent form 3. Females who are breast-feeding or pregnant 4. HIV-positive subjects: 1. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) related syndromes or symptoms that may pose an excessive risk for transplantation-related morbidity as determined by the Treatment Review Committee (see Appendix D). 2. Untreatable HIV infection due to multidrug ARV resistance. Subjects with a detectable or standard viral load \> 750 copies/mL should be evaluated with an HIV drug resistance test (HIV-1 genotype). The results should be included as part of the ARV review (described in Appendix D). 3. May not be currently prescribed ritonavir, cobacistat and/or zidovudine 5. Current uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection (currently taking medication with evidence of progression of clinical symptoms or radiologic findings) 6. Prior allogeneic HCT 7. History of primary idiopathic myelofibrosis 8. MDS subjects may not receive RIC and must be \< 50 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival365 days post transplantDeath from any cause. The time to this event is the time from HCT to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (whichever comes first). The overall survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival180 days and 365 days post-transplantTime from HCT until the documentation of disease progression / relapse or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Progression-free survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.
Cumulative Incidence of Neutrophil Recovery100 days and 365 days post transplantAchieving a donor derived ANC ≥ 500/mm3 for 3 consecutive laboratory values on different days. A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.
Cumulative Incidence of Platelet Recovery100 days and 365 days post transplantAchieving a platelet count ≥ 20,000/μL for 3 consecutive laboratory values on different days (with no platelet transfusions in the preceding seven days). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.
Cumulative Incidence of Acute GVHD100 days post-transplantAny skin, gastrointestinal or liver abnormalities fulfilling the BMT CTN Manual of Operations (2013) criteria of grades II-IV acute GVHD. A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. Any skin, gastrointestinal or liver abnormalities fulfilling the BMT CTN Manual of Operations (2013) criteria of grades III-IV acute GVHD. A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.
Grades II-IV Acute GVHD100 daysAny skin, gastrointestinal or liver abnormalities fulfilling the BMT CTN Manual of Operations (2013) criteria of grades II-IV acute GVHD. A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.
Grades III-IV Acute GVHD100 daysAny skin, gastrointestinal or liver abnormalities fulfilling the BMT CTN Manual of Operations (2013) criteria of grades III-IV acute GVHD. A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.
Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD180 days and 365 days post-transplantPer National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria and includes organ involvement and severity, and overall global composite score (mild/moderate/severe). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. Death from any cause. The time to this event is the time from HCT to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (whichever comes first). The overall survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.
Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 CMV Reactivation or Infection100 days, 180 days, and 365 daysGrade 2: Clinically active CMV infection (e.g. symptoms, cytopenias) or CMV Viremia not decreasing by at least 2/3 of the baseline value after 2 weeks of therapy; Grade 3: CMV end-organ involvement (pneumonitis, enteritis, retinitis). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. Death from any cause. The time to this event is the time from HCT to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (whichever comes first). The overall survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.
Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 3 CMV Infection100 days, 180 days, and 365 daysCMV end-organ involvement (pneumonitis, enteritis, retinitis) ). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. Death from any cause. The time to this event is the time from HCT to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (whichever comes first). The overall survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.
Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 EBV Infection100 days, 180 days, and 365 daysGrade 2: EBV reactivation requiring institution of therapy with rituximab; Grade 3: EBV post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. Death from any cause. The time to this event is the time from HCT to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (whichever comes first). The overall survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.
Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 BK Virus Infection100 days, 180 days, 365 daysBK viremia or viruria with clinical consequence requiring prolonged therapy and/or surgical intervention). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.
Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 Adenovirus Infection100 days, 180 days, and 365 daysGrade 2: Adenoviral URI, viremia, or symptomatic viruria requiring treatment; Grade 3: ADV with end-organ involvement (except conjunctivitis and upper respiratory tract) ). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. Death from any cause. The time to this event is the time from HCT to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (whichever comes first). The overall survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.
Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 HHV-6 Infection100 days, 180 days, 365 daysClinically active HHV-6 infection (e.g. symptoms, cytopenias) or HHV-6 viremia without viral load decline 0.5 log after 2 weeks of therapy). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.
Cumulative Incidence of Relapse/Progression180 days and 365 days post-transplantDefined by either morphological, cytogenetic/molecular or radiological evidence of disease consistent with pre-HCT features. A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. Death from any cause. The time to this event is the time from HCT to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (whichever comes first). The overall survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.
Cumulative Incidences of Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) and Hepatic Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (SOS)365 days post transplantTMA is defined as (Ho et al., 2005): 1. RBC fragmentation and \>2 schistocytes per high-power field on peripheral smear 2. Concurrent increased serum LDH above institutional baseline 3. Concurrent renal and/or neurologic dysfunction without other explanation 4. Negative direct and indirect Coombs test results A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. VOD/SOS is defined as: In the first 20 days after HCT, the presence of ≥2 of the following: 1. Bilirubin \>2 mg/Dl, 2. Hepatomegaly or pain in right upper quadrant, 3. Weight gain (\>2% basal weight). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.
Transplant-related Mortality100 days, 180 days, and 365 days post-transplantDeath without evidence of disease progression or recurrence. A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.
Donor Chimerism28 days, 56 days, 100 days, 180 days, and 365 days post-transplantPeripheral blood chimerism (% of donor chimerism) in whole blood (unsorted). The degree of donor chimerism will be summarized using descriptive statistics.
Peripheral Blood Chimerism56 days post-transplantThe frequency of subjects with Peripheral blood (unsorted) chimerism\>95% at 56 days will be described.
Proportion of Subjects Proceeding to TransplantPre-HCTThe proportion of subjects proceeding to HCT after informed consent.
Time From Search to Donor IdentificationPre-HCTTime from search to donor identification Time from preliminary search to formal donor activation.
Donor Selection Characteristics: HLA MatchPre-HCTNumber of matched donor and recipient HLA allele pairs. A matched donor would have 8/8 HLA allele pairs matching; mismatched donors listed below have one to four mismatched HLA allele pairs at HLA-A, -B, -C, or -DRB1.
Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor AgePre-HCTDonor age
Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age, CategoricalPre-HCTDonor age, categorical
Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor WeightPre-HCTDonor weight
Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor SexPre-HCTDonor sex
Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient SexPre-HCTDonor-recipient sex match
Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient CMV SerostatusPre-HCTDonor-recipient Cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus match
Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient ABO Blood MatchPre-HCTDonor-recipient ABO group match
Donor Clonal Hematopoiesis100 days and 365 days post-transplantThe proportion of subjects developing donor clonal hematopoiesis
Subgroup Analysis of HIV-positive Subjects365 days post transplantIf CCR5delta32 homozygous donors are successfully found and used for one or more HIV-positive subjects, a descriptive analysis of baseline characteristics and outcomes for those HIV-positive subjects will be conducted, including the viral load detected over time obtained from collected samples.
Cumulative Incidence of Primary Graft Failure56 days post-transplantLack of donor-derived neutrophil engraftment. The frequency of subjects experiencing primary graft failure by 56 days will be described.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)
Participants received one of three regimens: cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation; busulfan and cyclophosphamide; or fludarabine and busulfan
40
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)
Participants received one of two regimens: fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and low-dose total body irradiation
40
Total80

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath108
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalMyeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)
Age, Continuous51.5 years48.5 years59.5 years
CMV serostatus
Negative
34 Participants16 Participants18 Participants
CMV serostatus
Positive
46 Participants24 Participants22 Participants
Conditioning Regimen
Bu and Cy
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Conditioning Regimen
Bu and Flu
31 Participants31 Participants0 Participants
Conditioning Regimen
TBI and Cy
6 Participants6 Participants0 Participants
Conditioning Regimen
TBI, CY, and Flu
40 Participants0 Participants40 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
ALL (CR1)
13 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
ALL (CR2+)
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
AML (CR1)
32 Participants22 Participants10 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
AML (CR2+)
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
AML (PIF)
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
CLL (CR)
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
HL (CR1)
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
HL (PIF)
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
HL (Relapse)
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
MDS (CR)
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
MDS (HI)
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
NHL (CR1)
5 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
NHL (CR2+)
4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
NHL (PIF)
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
NHL (Relapse)
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
Other acute leukemia (CR1)
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Disease and disease status at HCT
Other acute leukemia (CR2+)
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Disease status pre-HCT
CR
4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Disease status pre-HCT
CR1
55 Participants32 Participants23 Participants
Disease status pre-HCT
CR2+
12 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Disease status pre-HCT
HI
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Disease status pre-HCT
PIF
5 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Disease status pre-HCT
Progression/Relapse
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Donor age
18-29 years of age
47 Participants24 Participants23 Participants
Donor age
30-39 years of age
20 Participants9 Participants11 Participants
Donor age
40-49 years of age
10 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Donor age
50-59 years of age
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Donor/recipient ABO match
Bi-directional
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Donor/recipient ABO match
Major mismatch
16 Participants8 Participants8 Participants
Donor/recipient ABO match
Matched
44 Participants20 Participants24 Participants
Donor/recipient ABO match
Minor mismatch
17 Participants12 Participants5 Participants
Donor/recipient CMV serostatus
-/-
19 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Donor/recipient CMV serostatus
-/+
19 Participants9 Participants10 Participants
Donor/recipient CMV serostatus
+/-
11 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Donor/recipient CMV serostatus
+/+
31 Participants18 Participants13 Participants
Donor/recipient sex
F-F
18 Participants9 Participants9 Participants
Donor/recipient sex
F-M
18 Participants11 Participants7 Participants
Donor/recipient sex
M-F
20 Participants8 Participants12 Participants
Donor/recipient sex
M-M
24 Participants12 Participants12 Participants
Donor Sex
Female
36 Participants20 Participants16 Participants
Donor Sex
Male
44 Participants20 Participants24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
19 Participants12 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
61 Participants28 Participants33 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
HCT Comorbidity Index score
0
13 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
HCT Comorbidity Index score
1
10 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
HCT Comorbidity Index score
2
14 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
HCT Comorbidity Index score
3+
43 Participants24 Participants19 Participants
HIV infection pre-HCT
No
76 Participants40 Participants36 Participants
HIV infection pre-HCT
Yes
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
HLA match, categorical
4/8
5 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
HLA match, categorical
5/8
7 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
HLA match, categorical
6/8
19 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
HLA match, categorical
7/8
49 Participants26 Participants23 Participants
Infused CD34 cells, x10^6/kg2.66 cells x10^6/kg2.72 cells x10^6/kg2.2 cells x10^6/kg
Infused total nucleated cells x10^8/kg2.8 cells x10^8/kg2.81 cells x10^8/kg2.8 cells x10^8/kg
Karnofsky/Lansky performance score
100
15 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Karnofsky/Lansky performance score
70
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Karnofsky/Lansky performance score
80
24 Participants12 Participants12 Participants
Karnofsky/Lansky performance score
90
38 Participants21 Participants17 Participants
Number of prior autoHCTs
0
75 Participants38 Participants37 Participants
Number of prior autoHCTs
1
5 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Primary Disease
Acute leukemia
60 Participants37 Participants23 Participants
Primary Disease
CLL
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Primary Disease
Lymphoma
15 Participants1 Participants14 Participants
Primary Disease
MDS
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants9 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
60 Participants29 Participants31 Participants
Refined disease risk index
High
10 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Refined disease risk index
Intermediate
50 Participants29 Participants21 Participants
Refined disease risk index
Low
9 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Refined disease risk index
N/A
8 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Refined disease risk index
Very high
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
80 Participants40 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
38 Participants17 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
42 Participants23 Participants19 Participants
Time between diagnosis to HCT
< 6 months
24 Participants14 Participants10 Participants
Time between diagnosis to HCT
≥ 6 months
56 Participants26 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
11 / 408 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 400 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 4013 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival

Death from any cause. The time to this event is the time from HCT to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (whichever comes first). The overall survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.

Time frame: 365 days post transplant

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Overall Survival72.3 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Overall Survival78.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidence of Acute GVHD

Any skin, gastrointestinal or liver abnormalities fulfilling the BMT CTN Manual of Operations (2013) criteria of grades II-IV acute GVHD. A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. Any skin, gastrointestinal or liver abnormalities fulfilling the BMT CTN Manual of Operations (2013) criteria of grades III-IV acute GVHD. A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.

Time frame: 100 days post-transplant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidence of Acute GVHDGrades II-IV acute GVHD42.5 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidence of Acute GVHDGrades III-IV acute GVHD17.5 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidence of Acute GVHDGrades II-IV acute GVHD32.5 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidence of Acute GVHDGrades III-IV acute GVHD0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD

Per National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria and includes organ involvement and severity, and overall global composite score (mild/moderate/severe). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. Death from any cause. The time to this event is the time from HCT to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (whichever comes first). The overall survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.

Time frame: 180 days and 365 days post-transplant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD180 days27.6 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD365 days35.5 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD180 days10 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD365 days17.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidence of Neutrophil Recovery

Achieving a donor derived ANC ≥ 500/mm3 for 3 consecutive laboratory values on different days. A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.

Time frame: 100 days and 365 days post transplant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidence of Neutrophil Recovery100 days97.5 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidence of Neutrophil Recovery365 days97.5 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidence of Neutrophil Recovery100 days97.5 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidence of Neutrophil Recovery365 days97.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidence of Platelet Recovery

Achieving a platelet count ≥ 20,000/μL for 3 consecutive laboratory values on different days (with no platelet transfusions in the preceding seven days). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.

Time frame: 100 days and 365 days post transplant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidence of Platelet Recovery100 days87.5 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidence of Platelet Recovery365 days90 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidence of Platelet Recovery100 days95 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidence of Platelet Recovery365 days95 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidence of Primary Graft Failure

Lack of donor-derived neutrophil engraftment. The frequency of subjects experiencing primary graft failure by 56 days will be described.

Time frame: 56 days post-transplant

Population: Primary graft failure Lack of donor-derived neutrophil engraftment. The frequency of subjects experiencing primary graft failure by 56 days will be described. Transplanted participants surviving a minimum of 14 days post HCT and have complete data for both event status and event date.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidence of Primary Graft Failure0 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidence of Primary Graft Failure3 Participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidence of Relapse/Progression

Defined by either morphological, cytogenetic/molecular or radiological evidence of disease consistent with pre-HCT features. A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. Death from any cause. The time to this event is the time from HCT to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (whichever comes first). The overall survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.

Time frame: 180 days and 365 days post-transplant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidence of Relapse/Progression180 days22.6 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidence of Relapse/Progression365 days30.4 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidence of Relapse/Progression365 days22.5 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidence of Relapse/Progression180 days20 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidences of Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) and Hepatic Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (SOS)

TMA is defined as (Ho et al., 2005): 1. RBC fragmentation and \>2 schistocytes per high-power field on peripheral smear 2. Concurrent increased serum LDH above institutional baseline 3. Concurrent renal and/or neurologic dysfunction without other explanation 4. Negative direct and indirect Coombs test results A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. VOD/SOS is defined as: In the first 20 days after HCT, the presence of ≥2 of the following: 1. Bilirubin \>2 mg/Dl, 2. Hepatomegaly or pain in right upper quadrant, 3. Weight gain (\>2% basal weight). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.

Time frame: 365 days post transplant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) and Hepatic Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (SOS)Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA)5 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) and Hepatic Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (SOS)Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD)/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS)10 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) and Hepatic Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (SOS)Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA)0 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) and Hepatic Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD)/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (SOS)Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD)/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS)2.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 Adenovirus Infection

Grade 2: Adenoviral URI, viremia, or symptomatic viruria requiring treatment; Grade 3: ADV with end-organ involvement (except conjunctivitis and upper respiratory tract) ). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. Death from any cause. The time to this event is the time from HCT to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (whichever comes first). The overall survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.

Time frame: 100 days, 180 days, and 365 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 Adenovirus Infection100 days2.6 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 Adenovirus Infection180 days9 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 Adenovirus Infection365 days9 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 Adenovirus Infection100 days0 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 Adenovirus Infection180 days9.4 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 Adenovirus Infection365 days12.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 CMV Reactivation or Infection

Grade 2: Clinically active CMV infection (e.g. symptoms, cytopenias) or CMV Viremia not decreasing by at least 2/3 of the baseline value after 2 weeks of therapy; Grade 3: CMV end-organ involvement (pneumonitis, enteritis, retinitis). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. Death from any cause. The time to this event is the time from HCT to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (whichever comes first). The overall survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.

Time frame: 100 days, 180 days, and 365 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 CMV Reactivation or Infection100 days10.4 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 CMV Reactivation or Infection180 days10.4 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 CMV Reactivation or Infection365 days10.4 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 CMV Reactivation or Infection100 days7.6 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 CMV Reactivation or Infection180 days7.6 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 CMV Reactivation or Infection365 days7.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 EBV Infection

Grade 2: EBV reactivation requiring institution of therapy with rituximab; Grade 3: EBV post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. Death from any cause. The time to this event is the time from HCT to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (whichever comes first). The overall survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.

Time frame: 100 days, 180 days, and 365 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 EBV Infection100 days0 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 EBV Infection180 days2.9 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 EBV Infection365 days2.9 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 EBV Infection100 days0 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 EBV Infection180 days0 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2-3 EBV Infection365 days0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 BK Virus Infection

BK viremia or viruria with clinical consequence requiring prolonged therapy and/or surgical intervention). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.

Time frame: 100 days, 180 days, 365 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 BK Virus Infection100 days26.7 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 BK Virus Infection180 days26.7 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 BK Virus Infection365 days26.7 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 BK Virus Infection100 days29.7 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 BK Virus Infection180 days29.7 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 BK Virus Infection365 days29.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 HHV-6 Infection

Clinically active HHV-6 infection (e.g. symptoms, cytopenias) or HHV-6 viremia without viral load decline 0.5 log after 2 weeks of therapy). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.

Time frame: 100 days, 180 days, 365 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 HHV-6 Infection100 days12.5 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 HHV-6 Infection180 days12.5 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 HHV-6 Infection365 days12.5 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 HHV-6 Infection100 days5.1 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 HHV-6 Infection180 days5.1 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 2 HHV-6 Infection365 days5.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 3 CMV Infection

CMV end-organ involvement (pneumonitis, enteritis, retinitis) ). A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI. Death from any cause. The time to this event is the time from HCT to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (whichever comes first). The overall survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.

Time frame: 100 days, 180 days, and 365 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 3 CMV Infection100 days0 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 3 CMV Infection180 days0 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 3 CMV Infection365 days0 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 3 CMV Infection100 days2.6 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 3 CMV Infection180 days2.6 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Cumulative Incidences of Viral Reactivations and Infections: Grade 3 CMV Infection365 days2.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Donor Chimerism

Peripheral blood chimerism (% of donor chimerism) in whole blood (unsorted). The degree of donor chimerism will be summarized using descriptive statistics.

Time frame: 28 days, 56 days, 100 days, 180 days, and 365 days post-transplant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Chimerism56 days100 percentage of donor chimerism
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Chimerism180 days100 percentage of donor chimerism
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Chimerism100 days100 percentage of donor chimerism
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Chimerism365 days100 percentage of donor chimerism
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Chimerism28 days100 percentage of donor chimerism
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Chimerism365 days100 percentage of donor chimerism
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Chimerism28 days99.1 percentage of donor chimerism
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Chimerism56 days100 percentage of donor chimerism
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Chimerism100 days100 percentage of donor chimerism
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Chimerism180 days100 percentage of donor chimerism
Secondary

Donor Clonal Hematopoiesis

The proportion of subjects developing donor clonal hematopoiesis

Time frame: 100 days and 365 days post-transplant

Population: All participants assessed for donor clonal hematopoiesis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Clonal Hematopoiesis0 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Clonal Hematopoiesis0 Participants
Secondary

Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age

Donor age

Time frame: Pre-HCT

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age27 years
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age29 years
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age29 years
Secondary

Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age, Categorical

Donor age, categorical

Time frame: Pre-HCT

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age, Categorical18-2924 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age, Categorical30-399 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age, Categorical40-494 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age, Categorical50-593 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age, Categorical50-590 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age, Categorical18-2923 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age, Categorical40-496 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age, Categorical30-3911 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age, Categorical50-593 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age, Categorical30-3920 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age, Categorical40-4910 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor Age, Categorical18-2947 Participants
Secondary

Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient ABO Blood Match

Donor-recipient ABO group match

Time frame: Pre-HCT

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient ABO Blood MatchMajor mismatch8 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient ABO Blood MatchMatched20 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient ABO Blood MatchBidirectional0 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient ABO Blood MatchMinor mismatch12 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient ABO Blood MatchMajor mismatch8 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient ABO Blood MatchMinor mismatch5 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient ABO Blood MatchBidirectional3 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient ABO Blood MatchMatched24 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient ABO Blood MatchBidirectional3 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient ABO Blood MatchMatched44 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient ABO Blood MatchMinor mismatch17 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient ABO Blood MatchMajor mismatch16 Participants
Secondary

Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient CMV Serostatus

Donor-recipient Cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus match

Time frame: Pre-HCT

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient CMV Serostatus+/+18 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient CMV Serostatus+/-6 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient CMV Serostatus-/+9 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient CMV Serostatus-/-7 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient CMV Serostatus-/-12 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient CMV Serostatus+/+13 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient CMV Serostatus-/+10 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient CMV Serostatus+/-5 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient CMV Serostatus-/-19 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient CMV Serostatus+/-11 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient CMV Serostatus-/+19 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient CMV Serostatus+/+31 Participants
Secondary

Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient Sex

Donor-recipient sex match

Time frame: Pre-HCT

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient SexMale and male12 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient SexMale and female8 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient SexFemale and male11 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient SexFemale and female9 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient SexFemale and female9 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient SexMale and male12 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient SexFemale and male7 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient SexMale and female12 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient SexFemale and female18 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient SexMale and female20 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient SexFemale and male18 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor and Recipient SexMale and male24 Participants
Secondary

Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Sex

Donor sex

Time frame: Pre-HCT

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor SexMale20 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor SexFemale20 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor SexMale24 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor SexFemale16 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor SexMale44 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor SexFemale36 Participants
Secondary

Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Weight

Donor weight

Time frame: Pre-HCT

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Weight77 kg
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: Donor Weight77 kg
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: Donor Weight77 kg
Secondary

Donor Selection Characteristics: HLA Match

Number of matched donor and recipient HLA allele pairs. A matched donor would have 8/8 HLA allele pairs matching; mismatched donors listed below have one to four mismatched HLA allele pairs at HLA-A, -B, -C, or -DRB1.

Time frame: Pre-HCT

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: HLA Match7 out of 8 matching HLA allele pairs26 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: HLA Match6 out of 8 matching HLA allele pairs8 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: HLA Match5 out of 8 matching HLA allele pairs5 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Donor Selection Characteristics: HLA Match4 out of 8 matching HLA allele pairs1 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: HLA Match4 out of 8 matching HLA allele pairs4 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: HLA Match7 out of 8 matching HLA allele pairs23 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: HLA Match5 out of 8 matching HLA allele pairs2 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Donor Selection Characteristics: HLA Match6 out of 8 matching HLA allele pairs11 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: HLA Match4 out of 8 matching HLA allele pairs5 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: HLA Match6 out of 8 matching HLA allele pairs19 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: HLA Match5 out of 8 matching HLA allele pairs7 Participants
TotalDonor Selection Characteristics: HLA Match7 out of 8 matching HLA allele pairs49 Participants
Secondary

Grades III-IV Acute GVHD

Any skin, gastrointestinal or liver abnormalities fulfilling the BMT CTN Manual of Operations (2013) criteria of grades III-IV acute GVHD. A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.

Time frame: 100 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Grades III-IV Acute GVHD17.5 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Grades III-IV Acute GVHD0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Grades II-IV Acute GVHD

Any skin, gastrointestinal or liver abnormalities fulfilling the BMT CTN Manual of Operations (2013) criteria of grades II-IV acute GVHD. A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.

Time frame: 100 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Grades II-IV Acute GVHD42.5 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Grades II-IV Acute GVHD32.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Peripheral Blood Chimerism

The frequency of subjects with Peripheral blood (unsorted) chimerism\>95% at 56 days will be described.

Time frame: 56 days post-transplant

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Peripheral Blood Chimerism24 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Peripheral Blood Chimerism27 Participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival

Time from HCT until the documentation of disease progression / relapse or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Progression-free survival probability and 90% CI will be calculated by the Kaplan Meier product limit estimator.

Time frame: 180 days and 365 days post-transplant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Progression-free Survival180 days69.9 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Progression-free Survival365 days62.1 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Progression-free Survival180 days72.5 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Progression-free Survival365 days67.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Proceeding to Transplant

The proportion of subjects proceeding to HCT after informed consent.

Time frame: Pre-HCT

Population: Participants who signed informed consent.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Proportion of Subjects Proceeding to Transplant80 Participants
Secondary

Subgroup Analysis of HIV-positive Subjects

If CCR5delta32 homozygous donors are successfully found and used for one or more HIV-positive subjects, a descriptive analysis of baseline characteristics and outcomes for those HIV-positive subjects will be conducted, including the viral load detected over time obtained from collected samples.

Time frame: 365 days post transplant

Population: Four subjects with HIV-positive, no statistical analysis for this outcome measure was completed due to limited HIV-positive rate. Descriptive analysis provided.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Subgroup Analysis of HIV-positive SubjectsSurvival Status: Alive0 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Subgroup Analysis of HIV-positive SubjectsSurvival Status: Deceased (relapse)0 Participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Subgroup Analysis of HIV-positive SubjectsSurvival Status: Deceased (fungal infection)0 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Subgroup Analysis of HIV-positive SubjectsSurvival Status: Alive1 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Subgroup Analysis of HIV-positive SubjectsSurvival Status: Deceased (relapse)2 Participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Subgroup Analysis of HIV-positive SubjectsSurvival Status: Deceased (fungal infection)1 Participants
Secondary

Time From Search to Donor Identification

Time from search to donor identification Time from preliminary search to formal donor activation.

Time frame: Pre-HCT

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Time From Search to Donor Identification77.5 days
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Time From Search to Donor Identification88.5 days
Secondary

Transplant-related Mortality

Death without evidence of disease progression or recurrence. A cumulative incidence will be computed along with a 90% CI.

Time frame: 100 days, 180 days, and 365 days post-transplant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Transplant-related Mortality100 days5 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Transplant-related Mortality180 days7.5 percentage of participants
Myeloablative Conditioning (MAC)Transplant-related Mortality365 days7.5 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Transplant-related Mortality100 days7.5 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Transplant-related Mortality180 days7.5 percentage of participants
Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC)Transplant-related Mortality365 days10 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026