Ovarian Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
This study evaluates the therapeutic response by modern FMRI and PET techniques with the perspective to exploit multimodal data (fusion MRI/PET). The Sponsor would like to optimize the respective performances and to define the early assessment criteria, at the first detox, of the treatment efficacy, with and without antiangiogenic agent.
Detailed description
This study evaluates the therapeutic response by modern FMRI and PET techniques with the perspective to exploit multimodal data (fusion MRI/PET). The Sponsor would like to optimize the respective performances and to define the early assessment criteria, at the first detox, of the treatment efficacy, with and without antiangiogenic agent. It is a single center evaluation of the study treatment.
Interventions
Functional Imaging before and after 1 cycle of chemotherapy treatment, in the previous 4 days before the second course: PET1 and MRI1
Functional Imaging after 4 cycles of chemotherapy treatment, in the 3 weeks after the chemotherapy, before the interval surgery: PET4 and MRI4 The RECIST evaluation will be done, usually, by scanner to 4 courses of chemotherapy before the surgery interval
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Epithelial ovarian carcinoma, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma FIGO IIIC-IV histologically confirmed by biopsy and documented stage and untreated * Pre-treatment abdominopelvic PET-CT and MRI within 4 weeks before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. * During laparoscopy performed by an experienced surgeon in the treatment of ovarian cancer, patient considered ineligible for tumor cell kill at the outset. * A life expectancy of greater than three months * An eligible patient for Paclitaxel and Carboplatine based chemotherapy. * Membership of a social security scheme * Patient information and signed, dated written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Pre-treated using chemotherapy, radiology, or surgery for an ovarian cancer. * Contraindication to MRI with the injection of contrast product, i.e, the first three months pregnancy, claustrophobia, major allergic antecedents, pacemaker, some surgery clips, some heart valves, cava filter, implanter pumps, cochlear implants, metallic extraneous malter. * Uncontrolled diabetes * Pregnancy and nursing * Other uncontrolled medical conditions as thyroid pathology, neuropsychiatric disease, infection, coronary insufficiency or grade 3 - 4 heart disease established by association New York Heart * Patient deprived of liberty and legally protect adult, or not in position to give consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Intra-rater Reliability of PET Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks | Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observers of quantization parameter ADC of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist. |
| Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pre-therapeutic | Individual intra-class correlation coefficients by location (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter SUVmax of functional imaging positron emission tomography. The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other. |
| Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pre-therapeutic | Average intra-class correlation coefficients(Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter SUVmax of functional imaging positron emission tomography. The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other. |
| Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pre-therapeutic | Individual intra-class correlation coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter MTV of functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography. The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other. |
| Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pre-therapeutic | Average intra-class correlation coefficients (Absolute agreement) arepresented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter MTV of functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography. The functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other. |
| Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pretherapeutic | Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter ADC of functional imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other. |
| Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pretherapeutic | Average intra-class correlation coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter ADC of functional imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other. |
| Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - AverageIntra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks | Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter MTV of functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography (PET). The functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other. |
| Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pre-therapeutic | Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameter ADC of functional imaging positron emission tomography (PET). The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist. |
| Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pre-therapeutic | Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameter SUVmax of functional imaging positron emission tomography (PET) . The imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist. |
| Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pre-therapeutic | Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameters functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography (MTV). The functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist. |
| Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pre-therapeutic | Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameters MTV of functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography. The functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist. |
| Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pretherapeutic | Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observers of quantization parameter ADC of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist. |
| Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pretherapeutic | Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observers of quantization parameter ADC of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) . The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist. |
| Individual Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | After four cycles of chemoterapy, 12 weeks | Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameter SUVmax of functional imaging positron emission tomography (PET). The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Marker CA125 and the Relative Variations (Between Pre-therapeutic and After Four Cycles of Chemotherapy) of the PET Parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL and TLG) | After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks | In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy). In other words, without paying attention to assessment times and the location of the lesion, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyse. The appearance of new lesions (not present at baseline) has not been taken into account in the calculation of relative variations. The disappearance of pre-existing lesions at baseline has been taken into account in the calculation of relative variations. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 4 cycles of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value divided by the pre-therapeutic value. |
| Spearman Correlation Test Between the Relative Variation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Marker CA125 | After one and four cycle(s) of chemotherapy (after 3 and 12 weeks) | In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. The appearance of new lesions (not present at baseline) has not been taken into account in the calculation of relative variations. The disappearance of pre-existing lesions at baseline has been taken into account in the calculation of relative variations. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value divided by the pre-therapeutic value. |
| Complete Surgery Resection | Interval surgery visit: up to 3 weeks after cycle 4 of chemotherapy and until the day before the surgery | — |
| Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUVmax by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks | In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0). |
| Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter MTV by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks | In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0). |
| Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUVN by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks | In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0). |
| Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter TLG by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks | In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0). |
| Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUL by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks | In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0). |
| Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of MRI Parameter ADC by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks | In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0). |
| Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of MRI Parameters ADC by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks | In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0). |
| Peritoneal Extent Assessed by Fagotti Score Using MRI Data | Pre-therapeutic | The Fagotti score ranges from 0 to 14 and is used to evaluate the peritoneal damage of patients. This score was collected during pretherapy and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. The higher the stage number is, the further the cancer has spread. The Fagotti questionnaire has 7 items. A subscale value of 0 or 2 is assigned depending on whether the disease is present in those specific sites : large omentum, peritoneal carcinosis , diaphragmatic carcinosis, mesenteric retraction, intestinal infiltration, stomach infiltration,liver metastases. The sum of subscale values corresponds to Fagotti score. |
| Overall Survival | 10 months | — |
| Progression-free Survival as Per RECIST v1.1 | 9, 13, 14 months | — |
| Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Marker CA125 and the Relative Variations (Between Pretherapeutic and After One Cycle of Chemotherapy) of the PET Parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL and TLG) | After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks | In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy). In other words, without paying attention to assessment times and the location of the lesion, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyse. The appearance of new lesions (not present at baseline) has not been taken into account in the calculation of relative variations. The disappearance of pre-existing lesions at baseline has been taken into account in the calculation of relative variations. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 cycle of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value divided by the pre-therapeutic value. |
Countries
France
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
The first steering committee (which met on 30th June, 2015) decided that one patient was not assessable for primary endpoint and had to be replaced. This patient deceased after the first line chemotherapy.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Functional Imaging A pilot study to evaluate the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer by multimodal functional imaging (Fusion MRI and FDG-PET-CT)
Functional Imaging previous the second course: Functional Imaging before and after 1 cycle of chemotherapy treatment, in the previous 4 days before the second course: PET1 and MRI1
Functional Imaging previous the surgery: Functional Imaging after 4 cycles of chemotherapy treatment, in the 3 weeks after the chemotherapy, before the interval surgery: PET4 and MRI4 The RECIST evaluation will be done, usually, by scanner to 4 courses of chemotherapy before the surgery interval | 11 |
| Total | 11 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Functional Imaging | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 67.0 years | — |
| Height | 164.0 cm | — |
| Histological type Other type | 0 Participants | — |
| Histological type Serous | 11 Participants | — |
| Location of the tumour Ovaries | 9 Participants | — |
| Location of the tumour Primitive peritoneal | 1 Participants | — |
| Location of the tumour Trunk | 1 Participants | — |
| Number of measurable initial lesions 1 | 2 Participants | — |
| Number of measurable initial lesions 2 | 2 Participants | — |
| Number of measurable initial lesions 3 | 1 Participants | — |
| Number of measurable initial lesions 4 | 3 Participants | — |
| Number of measurable initial lesions 5 | 3 Participants | — |
| Number of non-target lesions 2 | 3 Participants | — |
| Number of non-target lesions 3 | 5 Participants | — |
| Number of non-target lesions 4 | 1 Participants | — |
| Number of non-target lesions 5 | 2 Participants | — |
| Performance status ECOG 0 | 4 Participants | — |
| Performance status ECOG 1 | 6 Participants | — |
| Performance status ECOG Not available | 1 Participants | — |
| Proven epithelial carcinoma of gynaecological origin No | 0 Participants | — |
| Proven epithelial carcinoma of gynaecological origin Yes | 11 Participants | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 11 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | — |
| Stage of the tumour III-c | 5 Participants | — |
| Stage of the tumour IV | 6 Participants | — |
| Sum of the diameters | 176.0 diameters | — |
| Total Fagotti Score 10 | 3 Participants | — |
| Total Fagotti Score 12 | 1 Participants | — |
| Total Fagotti Score 4 | 2 Participants | — |
| Total Fagotti Score 8 | 4 Participants | — |
| Total Fagotti Score Not available | 1 Participants | — |
| Weight | 59.0 Kg | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 11 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 11 / 11 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 11 |
Outcome results
Individual Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameter SUVmax of functional imaging positron emission tomography (PET). The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: After four cycles of chemoterapy, 12 weeks
Population: For patients with lesions by location after one cycle of chemotherapy: only one patients had sus-mesocolic lesions, nine sub-mesocolic lesion, one ADP lesions and no patient had visceral lesion.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Individual Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Individual Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Individual Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Individual Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.971 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Individual Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter ADC of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks
Population: For patients with lesions by location after once cycle of chemotherapy: only eight patients had supra-diaphragmatic lesions and nine had ADP lesions.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.893 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.507 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.885 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.723 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.855 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.926 proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average intra-class correlation coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter ADC of functional imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: Pretherapeutic
Population: For patients with lesions by location at baseline: only eight patients had supra-diaphragmatic lesions and nine had ADP lesions.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.897 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.960 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.885 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.302 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.991 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.987 proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter of ADC functional imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks
Population: For patients with lesions by location after four cycles of chemotherapy: only eight patients had supra-diaphragmatic lesions (or ADP lesions).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.980 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.844 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.926 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.703 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.910 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter ADC of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks
Population: For patients with lesions by location after one cycle of chemotherapy : only eight patients had supra-diaphragmatic lesions and nine had ADP lesions.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.807 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.340 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | -0.080 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.566 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.747 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.863 proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter ADC of functional imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: Pretherapeutic
Population: For patients with lesions by location at baseline : only eight patients had supra-diaphragmatic lesions and nine had ADP lesions.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.813 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.922 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.794 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.178 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.983 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.974 proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter ADC of functional imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks
Population: For patients with lesions by location after four cycles of chemotherapy: only eight patients had supra-diaphragmatic lesions (or ADP lesions).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.961 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.730 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.862 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.543 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.834 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter SUVmax of functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography (PET) . The functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography (PET) will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks
Population: Eligible and evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.996 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.938 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.991 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.999 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.482 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.989 proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter SUVmax of functional imaging positron emission tomography (PET). The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks
Population: For patients with lesions by location after four cycles of chemotherapy: No patients with lesions in supra-diaphragmatic and viscera locations
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.960 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.976 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.981 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.970 proportion of agreement |
| Unknown | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | — proportion of agreement |
| Unknown | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | — proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average intra-class correlation coefficients(Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter SUVmax of functional imaging positron emission tomography. The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: Pre-therapeutic
Population: Eligible and evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.980 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.996 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.999 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.992 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.998 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.975 proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual intra-class correlation coefficients by location (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter SUVmax of functional imaging positron emission tomography. The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: Pre-therapeutic
Population: Eligible and evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.951 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.992 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.997 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.983 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.997 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.960 proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observers of quantization parameter SUVmax of functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography (PET). The functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography (PET) will be interpreted twice by radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks
Population: Eligible and evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.317 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.992 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.884 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.983 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.998 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.977 proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter SUVmax of functional imaging positron emission tomography (PET) . The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks
Population: For patients with lesions by location after four cycles of chemotherapy: No patients with lesions in supra-diaphragmatic and viscera locations
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.923 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.953 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.962 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.942 proportion of agreement |
| Unknown | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | — proportion of agreement |
| Unknown | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | — proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter MTV of functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography (PET). The functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography (PET) will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks
Population: Eligible and evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.670 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.937 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.347 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.823 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.654 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.997 proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average intra-class correlation coefficients (Absolute agreement) arepresented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter MTV of functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography. The functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: Pre-therapeutic
Population: Eligible and evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.650 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.621 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.241 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.855 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.044 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.937 proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - AverageIntra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter MTV of functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography (PET). The functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks
Population: For patients with lesions by location after four cycles of chemotherapy: No patients with lesions in supra-diaphragmatic and viscera locations
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - AverageIntra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.978 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - AverageIntra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.398 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - AverageIntra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.999 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - AverageIntra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.971 proportion of agreement |
| Unknown | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - AverageIntra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | — proportion of agreement |
| Unknown | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - AverageIntra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | — proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter MTV of functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography (MTV). The functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: After four cycles of chemoterapy, 12 weeks
Population: For patients with lesions by location after four cycles of chemotherapy: No patients with lesions in supra-diaphragmatic and viscera locations
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.957 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.248 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.998 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.943 proportion of agreement |
| Unknown | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | — proportion of agreement |
| Unknown | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | — proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual intra-class correlation coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter MTV of functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography (PET). The functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography (PET) will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: After one cycle of chemoterapy, 3 weeks
Population: Eligible and evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.504 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.882 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.210 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.699 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.486 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.994 proportion of agreement |
Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual intra-class correlation coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability between observers of quantization parameter MTV of functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography. The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently by 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine specialists, in blind to results found by the other.
Time frame: Pre-therapeutic
Population: Eligible and evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.482 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.450 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.137 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.747 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.023 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Inter-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.881 proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observers of quantization parameter ADC of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) . The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: Pretherapeutic
Population: For patients with lesions by location at baseline: only eight patients had supra-diaphragmatic lesions and nine had ADP lesions.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.855 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.944 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.623 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.356 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.780 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.980 proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observers of quantization parameter ADC of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks
Population: For patients with lesions by location after one cycle of chemotherapy: only eight patients had supra-diaphragmatic lesions and nine had ADP lesions.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.755 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.760 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | -0.091 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.622 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.884 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.998 proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observers of quantization parameter ADC of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks
Population: For patients with lesions by location after one cycle of chemotherapy: only eight patients had supra-diaphragmatic lesions and nine had ADP lesions.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.607 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.613 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | -0.043 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.451 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.792 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.996 proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observers of quantization parameter ADC of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: Pretherapeutic
Population: For patients with lesions by location at baseline: only eight patients had supra-diaphragmatic lesions and nine had ADP lesions.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.747 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.894 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.452 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.217 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.639 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.961 proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observers of quantization parameter ADC of functional imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks
Population: For patients with lesions (by location) after four cycles of chemotherapy: only eight patients had supra-diaphragmatic lesions (or ADP lesions) and nine had sus-mesocolic lesions.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.930 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.654 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.767 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.088 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.686 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.804 proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of PET Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observers of quantization parameter ADC of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks
Population: For patients with lesions (by location) after four cycles of chemotherapy: only eight patients had supra-diaphragmatic lesions (or ADP lesions) and nine had sus-mesocolic lesions.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of PET Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.868 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of PET Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.964 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of PET Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.791 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of PET Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.162 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of PET Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.814 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of PET Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.891 proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameter SUVmax of functional imaging positron emission tomography (PET). The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: After once cycle of chemoterapy, 3 weeks
Population: Eligible and evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.943 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.999 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.996 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.999 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.482 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.482 proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameter SUVmax of functional imaging positron emission tomography (PET). The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: After four cycles of chemoterapy, 12 weeks
Population: Eligible and evaluable population. Only one patient had sus-mesocolic lesions, one patient ADP lesions, nine patients sub-mesocolic lesions and no patient had supra-diaphragmatic or viscera lesions
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.944 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
| Unknown | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | — proportion of agreement |
| Unknown | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | — proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameter SUVmax of functional imaging positron emission tomography (PET) . The imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: Pre-therapeutic
Population: For patients with lesions by location at baseline: only one patients with lesions in viscera locations and nine patients with sus-mesocolic lesion
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.999 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.998 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.992 proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameter ADC of functional imaging positron emission tomography (PET). The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: Pre-therapeutic
Population: For patients with lesions by location at baseline: only one patient with lesions in viscera locations
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.998 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.997 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.985 proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameter SUV max of functional imaging positron emission tomography (PET). The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: After one cycle of chemoterapy, 3 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.893 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.998 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.993 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.997 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.317 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 1.000 proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameter MTV of functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography (PET). The functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: After once cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks
Population: Eligible and evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.882 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.946 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.983 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.495 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.323 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.999 proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameters MTV of functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography. The functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: Pre-therapeutic
Population: For patients with lesions by location at baseline : only nine patients with sub-mesocolic lesions.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.080 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.966 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.993 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.767 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.660 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.917 proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameter MTV functional imaging positron emission tomography (PET). The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks
Population: For patients with lesions by location after four cycles of chemotherapy: No patients with supra-diaphragmatic lesions or viscera lesions.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.885 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.885 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.987 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.993 proportion of agreement |
| Unknown | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | — proportion of agreement |
| Unknown | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Average Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | — proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameter MTV of functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography (PET). The functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: After one cycle of chemoterapy, 3 weeks
Population: Eligible and evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.789 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.898 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.967 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.329 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.193 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.997 proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameters functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography (MTV). The functional imaging Positron Emission Tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: Pre-therapeutic
Population: For patients with lesions by location at baseline : only nine patients with sub-mesocolic lesions.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | 0.987 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.622 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.493 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.847 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | 0.042 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.934 proportion of agreement |
Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location
Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (Absolute agreement) are presented by location to evaluate the reliability within observer of quantization parameter MTV functional imaging positron emission tomography (PET). The functional imaging positron emission tomography will be interpreted independently twice by the same radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist.
Time frame: After four cycle of chemoterapy, 12 weeks
Population: For patients with lesions by location after four cycles of chemotherapy: No patients with lesions in the location of supra-diaphragmatic and viscera
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Pelvis | 0.975 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sus-mesocolic | 0.794 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Sub-mesocolic | 0.794 proportion of agreement |
| Functional Imaging | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | ADP | 0.987 proportion of agreement |
| Unknown | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Supra-diaphragmatic | — proportion of agreement |
| Unknown | Intra-rater Reliability of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Metabolic Tumoral Volume (MTV) - Individual Intra-class Correlation Coefficients by Location | Viscera | — proportion of agreement |
Complete Surgery Resection
Time frame: Interval surgery visit: up to 3 weeks after cycle 4 of chemotherapy and until the day before the surgery
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Complete Surgery Resection | Yes | 10 Participants |
| Functional Imaging | Complete Surgery Resection | No | 0 Participants |
Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of MRI Parameter ADC by Response as Per RECIST V1.1
In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0).
Time frame: After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks
Population: Relative variations of ADC by response : 8 partial response and 2 stable disease
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of MRI Parameter ADC by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Partial response | 9.3 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 209.7 |
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of MRI Parameter ADC by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Stable disease | 4.3 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 25.1 |
Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of MRI Parameters ADC by Response as Per RECIST V1.1
In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0).
Time frame: After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks
Population: Relative variations of SUVmax by response : 8 partial response and 2 stable disease
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of MRI Parameters ADC by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Partial response | 38.6 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 274.5 |
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of MRI Parameters ADC by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Stable disease | -18.0 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 40.1 |
Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter MTV by Response as Per RECIST V1.1
In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0).
Time frame: After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter MTV by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Partial response | -94.7 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 11.4 |
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter MTV by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Stable disease | 12.9 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 52.9 |
Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter MTV by Response as Per RECIST V1.1
In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0).
Time frame: After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks
Population: Relative variations of MTV by response : 8 partial response and 2 stable disease
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter MTV by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Partial response | -38.5 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 47.6 |
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter MTV by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Stable disease | -3.3 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 5.4 |
Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUL by Response as Per RECIST V1.1
In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0).
Time frame: After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks
Population: Relative variations of TLG by response : 8 partial response and 2 stable disease
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUL by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Partial response | -66.9 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 29 |
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUL by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Stable disease | -14.7 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 33.8 |
Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUL by Response as Per RECIST V1.1
In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0).
Time frame: After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks
Population: Relative variations of TLG by response : 8 partial response and 2 stable disease
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUL by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Stable disease | -21.8 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 11.4 |
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUL by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Partial response | -24.9 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 31.9 |
Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUVmax by Response as Per RECIST V1.1
In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0).
Time frame: After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUVmax by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Partial response | -25.4 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 33.1 |
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUVmax by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Stable disease | -9.6 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 29.8 |
Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUVmax by Response as Per RECIST V1.1
In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. RRelative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0).
Time frame: After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks
Population: Relative variations of SUVmax by response : 8 partial response and 2 stable disease
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUVmax by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Partial response | -67.3 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 29.3 |
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUVmax by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Stable disease | -11.3 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 31.1 |
Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUVN by Response as Per RECIST V1.1
In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0).
Time frame: After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks
Population: Relative variations of SUVN by response : 8 partial response and 2 stable disease
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUVN by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Partial response | -65.2 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 29.4 |
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUVN by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Stable disease | -16.2 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 30.2 |
Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUVN by Response as Per RECIST V1.1
In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0).
Time frame: After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks
Population: Relative variations of SUVN by response : 8 partial response and 2 stable disease
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUVN by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Partial response | -21.8 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 28.8 |
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter SUVN by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Stable disease | -15.6 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 22.1 |
Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter TLG by Response as Per RECIST V1.1
In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0).
Time frame: After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks
Population: Relative variations of TLG by response : 8 partial response and 2 stable disease
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter TLG by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Partial response | -97.7 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 9.4 |
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter TLG by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Stable disease | -7.5 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 18.2 |
Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter TLG by Response as Per RECIST V1.1
In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles (C1 or C4) of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value (C0) divided by the pre-therapeutic value (C0).
Time frame: After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks
Population: Relative variations of TLG by response : 8 partial response and 2 stable disease
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter TLG by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Partial response | -63.5 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 52.4 |
| Functional Imaging | Descriptive Statistics of Relative Variations of PET Parameter TLG by Response as Per RECIST V1.1 | Stable disease | -15.2 change in relative variance | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
Overall Survival
Time frame: 10 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Overall Survival | 90 percentage of patients |
Peritoneal Extent Assessed by Fagotti Score Using MRI Data
The Fagotti score ranges from 0 to 14 and is used to evaluate the peritoneal damage of patients. This score was collected during pretherapy and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. The higher the stage number is, the further the cancer has spread. The Fagotti questionnaire has 7 items. A subscale value of 0 or 2 is assigned depending on whether the disease is present in those specific sites : large omentum, peritoneal carcinosis , diaphragmatic carcinosis, mesenteric retraction, intestinal infiltration, stomach infiltration,liver metastases. The sum of subscale values corresponds to Fagotti score.
Time frame: Pre-therapeutic
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Peritoneal Extent Assessed by Fagotti Score Using MRI Data | 12 | 1 Participants |
| Functional Imaging | Peritoneal Extent Assessed by Fagotti Score Using MRI Data | 4 | 2 Participants |
| Functional Imaging | Peritoneal Extent Assessed by Fagotti Score Using MRI Data | 8 | 4 Participants |
| Functional Imaging | Peritoneal Extent Assessed by Fagotti Score Using MRI Data | 10 | 2 Participants |
| Functional Imaging | Peritoneal Extent Assessed by Fagotti Score Using MRI Data | Missing | 1 Participants |
Peritoneal Extent Assessed by Fagotti Score Using MRI Data
TThe Fagotti score ranges from 0 to 14 and is used to evaluate the peritoneal damage of patients. This score was collected during pretherapy and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. The higher the stage number is, the further the cancer has spread. The Fagotti questionnaire has 7 items. A subscale value of 0 or 2 is assigned depending on whether the disease is present in those specific sites : large omentum, peritoneal carcinosis , diaphragmatic carcinosis, mesenteric retraction, intestinal infiltration, stomach infiltration,liver metastases. The sum of subscales corresponds to Fagotti score.
Time frame: Interval surgery visit: up to 3 weeks after cycle 4 of chemotherapy and until the day before the surgery
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Peritoneal Extent Assessed by Fagotti Score Using MRI Data | 0 | 1 Participants |
| Functional Imaging | Peritoneal Extent Assessed by Fagotti Score Using MRI Data | 2 | 1 Participants |
| Functional Imaging | Peritoneal Extent Assessed by Fagotti Score Using MRI Data | 4 | 2 Participants |
| Functional Imaging | Peritoneal Extent Assessed by Fagotti Score Using MRI Data | 6 | 2 Participants |
| Functional Imaging | Peritoneal Extent Assessed by Fagotti Score Using MRI Data | 8 | 3 Participants |
| Functional Imaging | Peritoneal Extent Assessed by Fagotti Score Using MRI Data | 10 | 1 Participants |
Progression-free Survival as Per RECIST v1.1
Time frame: 9, 13, 14 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Progression-free Survival as Per RECIST v1.1 | 9 months | 90.0 percentage of patients |
| Functional Imaging | Progression-free Survival as Per RECIST v1.1 | 13 months | 78.8 percentage of patients |
| Functional Imaging | Progression-free Survival as Per RECIST v1.1 | 14 months | 67.5 percentage of patients |
Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Marker CA125 and the Relative Variations (Between Pre-therapeutic and After Four Cycles of Chemotherapy) of the PET Parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL and TLG)
In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy). In other words, without paying attention to assessment times and the location of the lesion, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyse. The appearance of new lesions (not present at baseline) has not been taken into account in the calculation of relative variations. The disappearance of pre-existing lesions at baseline has been taken into account in the calculation of relative variations. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 4 cycles of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value divided by the pre-therapeutic value.
Time frame: After four cycles of chemotherapy, 12 weeks
Population: Eligible and evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Marker CA125 and the Relative Variations (Between Pre-therapeutic and After Four Cycles of Chemotherapy) of the PET Parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL and TLG) | Spearman correlation test statistics between CA125 and relative variation of PET parameter SUVmax | 0.811 Spearman's correlation coefficient |
| Functional Imaging | Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Marker CA125 and the Relative Variations (Between Pre-therapeutic and After Four Cycles of Chemotherapy) of the PET Parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL and TLG) | Spearman correlation test statistics between CA125 and relative variation of PET parameter MTV | 0.775 Spearman's correlation coefficient |
| Functional Imaging | Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Marker CA125 and the Relative Variations (Between Pre-therapeutic and After Four Cycles of Chemotherapy) of the PET Parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL and TLG) | Spearman correlation test statistics between CA125 and relative variation of PET parameter SUVN | 0.811 Spearman's correlation coefficient |
| Functional Imaging | Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Marker CA125 and the Relative Variations (Between Pre-therapeutic and After Four Cycles of Chemotherapy) of the PET Parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL and TLG) | Spearman correlation test statistics between CA125 and relative variation of PET parameter SUL | 0.811 Spearman's correlation coefficient |
| Functional Imaging | Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Marker CA125 and the Relative Variations (Between Pre-therapeutic and After Four Cycles of Chemotherapy) of the PET Parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL and TLG) | Spearman correlation test statistics between CA125 and relative variation of PET parameter TLG | 0.775 Spearman's correlation coefficient |
Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Marker CA125 and the Relative Variations (Between Pretherapeutic and After One Cycle of Chemotherapy) of the PET Parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL and TLG)
In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy). In other words, without paying attention to assessment times and the location of the lesion, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyse. The appearance of new lesions (not present at baseline) has not been taken into account in the calculation of relative variations. The disappearance of pre-existing lesions at baseline has been taken into account in the calculation of relative variations. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 cycle of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value divided by the pre-therapeutic value.
Time frame: After one cycle of chemotherapy, 3 weeks
Population: Eligible and evaluable population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Marker CA125 and the Relative Variations (Between Pretherapeutic and After One Cycle of Chemotherapy) of the PET Parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL and TLG) | Spearman correlation test statistics between CA125 and relative variation of PET parameter SUVmax | -0.091 Spearman's correlation coefficient |
| Functional Imaging | Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Marker CA125 and the Relative Variations (Between Pretherapeutic and After One Cycle of Chemotherapy) of the PET Parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL and TLG) | Spearman correlation test statistics between CA125 and relative variation of PET parameter MTV | -0.030 Spearman's correlation coefficient |
| Functional Imaging | Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Marker CA125 and the Relative Variations (Between Pretherapeutic and After One Cycle of Chemotherapy) of the PET Parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL and TLG) | Spearman correlation test statistics between CA125 and relative variation of PET parameter SUVN | -0.212 Spearman's correlation coefficient |
| Functional Imaging | Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Marker CA125 and the Relative Variations (Between Pretherapeutic and After One Cycle of Chemotherapy) of the PET Parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL and TLG) | Spearman correlation test statistics between CA125 and relative variation of PET parameter SUL | -0.212 Spearman's correlation coefficient |
| Functional Imaging | Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Marker CA125 and the Relative Variations (Between Pretherapeutic and After One Cycle of Chemotherapy) of the PET Parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL and TLG) | Spearman correlation test statistics between CA125 and relative variation of PET parameter TLG | -0.164 Spearman's correlation coefficient |
Spearman Correlation Test Between the Relative Variation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Marker CA125
In this section, only the maximum values of the PET parameters (SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG) and the minimum values of the MRI parameters (ADC) of each patient were taken into account for all lesions present at each evaluation time (pre-therapy, after 1 cycle of chemotherapy, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In other words, for each patient, the highest value of SUVmax, MTV, SUVN, SUL, TLG and the lowest ADC value was taken into account in the analyses. The appearance of new lesions (not present at baseline) has not been taken into account in the calculation of relative variations. The disappearance of pre-existing lesions at baseline has been taken into account in the calculation of relative variations. Relative variations has been calculated as the difference between the values collected after 1 or 4 cycles of chemotherapy and the pre-therapeutic value divided by the pre-therapeutic value.
Time frame: After one and four cycle(s) of chemotherapy (after 3 and 12 weeks)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Imaging | Spearman Correlation Test Between the Relative Variation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Marker CA125 | Relative variations between pre-therapeutic and after one cycle of chemotherapy | 0.103 Spearman's correlation coefficient |
| Functional Imaging | Spearman Correlation Test Between the Relative Variation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Marker CA125 | Relative variations between pre-therapeutic and after four cycles of chemotherapy | -0.571 Spearman's correlation coefficient |