Skip to content

A Clinical Effectiveness Trial in Post-Operative Pterional Craniotomy Drain Placement

A Randomized, Non-Blind, Clinical Effectiveness Trial in Post-Operative Pterional Craniotomy Drain Placement

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02792361
Acronym
EPOP
Enrollment
90
Registered
2016-06-07
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2016-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pterional Craniotomy

Keywords

Post-Operative Pterional Craniotomy, Suction Drain, Benefits

Brief summary

This is a clinical trial where patients who present to the neurosurgery service in need of a procedure that requires a pterional craniotomy will be screened, and if eligible, enrolled for the randomization in the placement of a drain at the surgical site. At present, there is not a protocol for whether or not to use a drain following this procedure. There is some debate on whether it serves any real benefit for the patient or if it may actually be detrimental in cases where infection occurs. This study aims to answer this question by randomizing patients to drain placement and then comparing patient outcomes between the two groups. These include the following: infection rate, length of hospital stay, self-reported patient pain and discomfort, the amount of time before patients are able to open their eye ipsilateral to the side of operation, change in forehead circumference post-op days 1-3, and any unforeseen post-operative complications. This will be accomplished through using a patient-administered survey, recording physical measurements, and a patient chart review. Statistical analysis will then be used to identify any differences that may exist.

Interventions

PROCEDUREStandard Suction Drain

The intervention of the experimental group will be a standard suction drain placed at the surgical site following a Pterional Craniotomy.

Sponsors

University of Arizona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients that have been scheduled for surgery requiring the use of a pterional craniotomy approach

Exclusion criteria

* Patients in need of a surgical intervention requiring a pterional craniotomy due to reasons of physical injury * Patients who need a pterional craniotomy with a orbitozygomatic approach * Patients who have noticeable physical injury to their skull * Patients with a prior surgical history of a craniotomy * Patients with a pathological condition deemed severe enough by the screening physician to possibly influence the healing process of the procedure (blood clot disorder, cirrhosis, severe nutrient depletion, congestive heart failure etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Length of Hospital StayFrom the date of surgery to the date of discharge from the hospital for up to 16 weeks following surgery, or until death, depending which comes first.Compare the length of hospital between the treatment groups and determine whether a significant difference exists.
Head Circumference DifferenceDay 1 through Day 3 following surgery.Compare the change in measured forehead circumference between treatment groups on post-operative days 1-3. Determine if a significant difference exists between the two.
Pain DifferenceAt the time of discharge from the hospital but no longer than up to 16 weeks from the date of surgery.Compare the reported pain/ discomfort between the patients who had drain placement from those who did not. This will be performed using a survey administered to patients upon removal of the drain
Ability to open ipsilateral eye to surgical site.Day 1 through Day 3 following surgery.Compare the number of subjects able to open and close their eye on the ipsilateral side of the surgical site between the study groups
Complication RateFrom the date of surgery to the date of discharge from the hospital for up to 16 weeks following surgery, or until death, depending which comes first.An overall assessment comparing complications between the two study groups will be performed. This will include looking things such as hospital acquired pneumonia, the development of any new neurological conditions or deficiencies, and other unforeseen complications that may arise which are not be directly related to the drain but may potentially still be influenced by it.
Surgical site infection rateFrom the date of surgery to the date of discharge from the hospital for up to 16 weeks following surgery, or until death, depending which comes first.Compare infections rates between patients with drains placement versus those who did not. Determine if there is any statistically significant difference in risk exists between the two study populations.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026