Skip to content

Plerixafor in Diabetic Wound Healing

Effect of a Single Plerixafor Injection on Diabetic Wound Healing. A Pilot, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02790957
Acronym
MOZOBL07740
Enrollment
25
Registered
2016-06-06
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
2019-11-30
Last updated
2019-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Limb Ischemia, Diabetes, Wounds

Brief summary

Chronic non-healing wounds represent a major source of morbidity, disability, and mortality in diabetic patients. Diabetes is the leading cause of non-traumatic limb amputations worldwide. Many patients with ischemic or neuroischemic wounds are not candidate to surgical/endovascular revascularization, owing to anatomical vascular reasons or for the underlying conditions and co-morbidities. Therefore, identification of novel medical treatment strategies to improve wound healing in diabetic patients is a major challenge for clinicians, researchers, and health care systems. Defects in bone marrow (BM)-derive stem and progenitor cells, including EPCs (endothelial progenitor cells), contribute to diabetic complications. Stem cell mobilizing agents have been previously studied as an adjunctive therapy for critical limb ischemia and chronic non-healing wounds in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, as well as for the treatment of diabetic wound infections . Meta-analyses of such studies indicate that stem cell mobilization in these clinical conditions is safe and potentially effective in improving surrogate outcome measures and hard endpoints (such as rates of wound healing and amputation). This study plans to evaluate whether a single injection of Plerixafor improves wound healing in diabetic patients with stage III-IV (neuro)ischemic wounds.

Detailed description

Chronic non-healing wounds represent a major source of morbidity, disability, and mortality in diabetic patients. Diabetes is the leading cause of non-traumatic limb amputations worldwide. Many patients with ischemic or neuroischemic wounds are not candidate to surgical/endovascular revascularization, owing to anatomical vascular reasons or for the underlying conditions and co-morbidities. Therefore, identification of novel medical treatment strategies to improve wound healing in diabetic patients is a major challenge for clinicians, researchers, and health care systems. Defects in bone marrow (BM)-derive stem and progenitor cells, including EPCs, contribute to diabetic complications. Stem cell mobilizing agents have been previously studied as an adjunctive therapy for critical limb ischemia and chronic non-healing wounds in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, as well as for the treatment of diabetic wound infections . Meta-analyses of such studies indicate that stem cell mobilization in these clinical conditions is safe and potentially effective in improving surrogate outcome measures and hard endpoints (such as rates of wound healing and amputation). However, diabetes impairs the response to the most commonly agent used to mobilize stem cells, namely human recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor (hrG-CSF). This notion comes from extensive data in animal models, a retrospective case series in patients with hematological disorders, a meta-analysis of studies conducted in patients with cardiovascular disease, and our proof-of-concept prospective study in otherwise healthy outpatients. Vice versa, our data strongly indicate that diabetic patients adequately mobilize stem/progenitor cells (including vascular progenitors, like EPCs) in response to the CXCR4 antagonist Plerixafor. Plerixafor (Mozobil, Sanofi) is clinically available in Europe (including Italy) as a second-line regimen for stem cell mobilization in patients with myeloma or lymphoma scheduled for autotransplantation, only in combination with hrG-CSF, after failure of hrG-CSF alone, to mobilize a sufficient amount of CD34+ stem cells to start apheresis. Preclinical studies in animal models of delayed and diabetic wound healing support the idea that Plerixafor can be effective as an adjunct therapy to accelerate diabetic wound healing. This study plans to evaluate whether a single injection of Plerixafor improves wound healing in diabetic patients with stage III-IV (neuro)ischemic wounds.

Interventions

DRUGPlerixafor

Single injection of 0.24 mg/kg Plerixafor

DRUGPlacebo

Single injection of an equal volume of NaCl solution

Sponsors

University Hospital Padova
CollaboratorOTHER
Gian Paolo Fadini
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Type 1 or type 2 diabetes * Men of 18-85 years or post-menopausal women \<85 years of age * Presence of neuroischemic or ischemic diabetic wound(s) of the leg(s) / foot(s) Texas grade 3 or 4, with or without infection. * Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Sepsis * Dialysis or severe chronic kidney disease (eGFR \<20ml/min/1.73 mq) * Advanced liver disease (defined as cirrhosis or transaminases \>3 times ULN) * Clinically relevant abnormalities in white blood cell counts at baseline. * Hematologic disorders (lymphoma, myeloma, acute or chronic leukemia, chronic myeloproliferative disorders) * Known or highly suspected solid cancer * Women with childbearing potential * Known hypersensitivity to Mozobil (Plerixafor or its components) * Inability to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound healing rate6 monthsComparison of wound healing rates in the 2 groups, defined as the complete healing of wounds after 6 months from randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound size6 monthsComparison of changes in wound size over time (up to 6 months) in the 2 groups.
Oxygen tension6 monthsComparison of changes in TcO2 (transcutaneous oxygen tension) over time (up to 6 months) in the 2 groups.
Perfusion6 monthsComparison of changes in ankle/brachial index over time (up to 6 months) in the 2 groups.
Surgical intervention6 monthsComparison of the rates of surgical intervention (including debridement and amputations) at 6 months in the 2 groups.
Stem cell mobilization6 monthsComparison of CD34+ cell mobilization (ratio of cell level at 6 hour post-Plerixafor administration and baseline) in patients with good versus poor outcomes
Incidence of adverse events and reactions6 monthsComparison in the incidence of adverse events and reactions in the 2 groups

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026