Dysplasia, Lip and Oral Cavity Carcinoma, Oral Disorder, Premalignant Lesion
Conditions
Brief summary
This early phase I trial studies how well multimodal imaging works for surveillance in patients with oral potentially malignant disorders. New types of imaging devices may help doctors decide if a lesion in the mouth is pre-cancerous or cancerous.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare standard white light examination to multimodal imaging for detection of high grade dysplasia and carcinoma during follow-up examinations of patients with oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine qualitative and quantitative diagnostic assessment of patients who agree to undergo imaging and have images of sufficient quality. II. To compare expression of molecular biomarkers to results from white light examination, multimodal imaging and pathologic assessment in a subset of patients who have invasive biopsies or resection. III. To compare cytologic results from brush biopsy specimens to white light examination and multimodal imaging results. OUTLINE: Participants undergo PS2.1/PS3 imaging and high-resolution microendoscope imaging with proflavine hemisulfate applied to the mucosa. Patients also undergo brush biopsy and incisional biopsy. Procedures are repeated every 3-4 months for 2 years. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days.
Interventions
Undergo brush biopsy and incisional biopsy
Undergo PS2.1/PS3 imaging
Undergo HRME imaging
Applied on mucosa
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subjects who are willing to participate. * Adult subjects with: a. clinically evident oral premalignant lesion (OPL) or suspicious oral mucosal lesion. or b. pathologic diagnosis of dysplasia or c. history of resected oral cancer or d. oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD) or e. history of tobacco and/or alcohol exposure. * Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document (ICD).
Exclusion criteria
* Known allergy to proflavine or acriflavine. * Pregnant females.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Detection of high grade dysplasia and carcinoma | Up to 2 years | Will compare standard white light examination to multimodal imaging for detection of high grade dysplasia and carcinoma during follow-up examinations of patients with oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic assessment | Up to 2 years | Will determine qualitative and quantitative diagnostic assessment of patients who agree to undergo imaging and have images of sufficient quality. |
| Biomarker analysis | Up to 2 years | Will compare expression of molecular biomarkers to results from white light examination, multimodal imaging and pathologic assessment in a subset of patients who have invasive biopsies or resection. |
| Cytologic results | Up to 2 years | Will compare cytologic results from brush biopsy specimens to white light examination and multimodal imaging results. |
Countries
United States