Skip to content

Outcomes of Renal Function in Hepatorenal Syndrome (HRS) Determined By Comparison of Target Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) of 65 - 70 Mmhg Versus ≥ 85 Mmhg

Outcomes of Renal Function in Hepatorenal Syndrome (HRS) Determined By Comparison of Target Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) of 65 - 70 Mmhg Versus ≥ 85 Mmhg

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02789150
Enrollment
18
Registered
2016-06-02
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2018-01-11
Last updated
2018-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatorenal Syndrome

Brief summary

Comparing renal outcomes based on a Mean Arterail Pressure (MAP) of 65-7085mmhg versus a MAP of greater than or equal to 85mmhg

Detailed description

Main hypothesis: The investigators propose that there will be no difference clinical outcomes as evidenced by a significant difference in urine output or change in creatinine between the MAP target ≥ 85mmhg and the MAP target of 65-70 mmhg. Primary end point: To determine if High MAP or Low MAP will provide the most optimal renal function. The primary endpoints will be 96h UOP and change in creatinine levels. UOP will be calculated as cc/24 hours. The investigators will compare the change in urinary output of day 1 versus day 4. Creatinine will be measured daily and the change from initiation to completion of the study will be recorded. The mean values of these will be compared. Secondary end point: To determine if High MAP or Low MAP will decrease the occurrence of cardiac events (arrhythmias and myocardial infarctions) and vascular events (limb or intestinal ischemia). Study Design: This is a prospective, unblinded, randomized, Two-arm treatment, pilot study. Patients will undergo block randomization to receive either a MAP ≥ 85mmhg or a MAP 65-70mmhg.

Interventions

DRUGNorepinephrine (Levophed)

Titrate norepinephrine to MAP 65-70

Sponsors

University of Louisville
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 1\. Admission to intensive care unit (ICU) 2. Age \>18 years old 3. Able to obtain informed consent obtained from the patient, from the patient's power of attorney, or from the next of kin 4. Must meet all major criteria based on the International Ascites Club definition and diagnostic criteria for Hepatorenal Syndrome: 1. chronic or acute liver disease with advanced hepatic failure and portal hypertension; 2. the serum creatinine is greater than 1. 5 mg/dL or 24 hour creatinine clearance of less than 40 ml/min; 3. absence of shock, ongoing bacterial infection, and current or recent treatment with nephrotoxic drugs; 4. absence of gastrointestinal fluid losses (repeated vomiting or intense diarrhea) or renal fluid losses; 5. no sustained improvement in renal function defined as a decrease in serum creatinine to less than 1.5 mg/dL or increase in 24 hour creatinine clearance to 40 ml/min or more following diuretic withdrawal and expansion of plasma volume with 1.5 L of isotonic saline; 6. proteinuria less than 500 mg/dL; 7. no ultrasonic evidence of obstructive uropathy or parenchymal renal disease. 5. In addition, patients must meet the definition of HRS type I or HRS type I <!-- --> 1. -HRS I defined by a rapid deterioration in kidney function with the serum creatinine increasing by more than 100% from baseline to greater than 2.5mg/dl within a two week period. 2. -HRS II defined as: patients with refractory ascites with either a steady but moderate degree of functional renal failure (≥ 1.5mg/dl) or deterioration in kidney function that does not fulfill the criteria for HRS type I

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. pre-existing continuous renal replacement therapy cannot or those initiated on dialysis during their hospital stay. 2\. artificial liver support therapies 3. ongoing gastrointestinal bleeding 4. active surgical issues 5. pre-existing TIPS or TIPS placed during hospital stay 6. long standing hypertension 7. improvement in renal function after central blood volume expansion contraindications to norepinephrine (active myocardial event, ventricular arrhythmia, obstructive physiology, limb ischemia) 8. Pregnancy 9. Treating physicians refusing to enroll patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Urine output2 yearsTo determine if High MAP or Low MAP will provide the most optimal renal function. The primary endpoints will be 96h UOP and change in creatinine levels. UOP will be calculated as cc/24 hours. We will compare the change in urinary output of day 1 versus day 4. Creatinine will be measured daily and the change from initiation to completion of the study will be recorded. The mean values of these will be compared.
serum creatinine2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cardiac events2 yearsTo determine if High MAP or Low MAP will decrease the occurrence of cardiac events (arrhythmias and myocardial infarctions) and vascular events (limb or intestinal ischemia).
ischemic events2 yearsTo determine if High MAP or Low MAP will decrease the occurrence of cardiac events (arrhythmias and myocardial infarctions) and vascular events (limb or intestinal ischemia).

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026