Inguinal Hernia
Conditions
Brief summary
To determine if there is a difference in the quality of life in between patients who undergoes laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) or modified Lichtenstein hernioplasty
Detailed description
Patients presenting with incarcerated inguinal hernias will be randomized between open or laparoscopic repair groups. The primary outcome will be the quality of life scores. Patients will be followed-up for 12 months.
Interventions
Open Lichtenstein Hernioplasty
Laparoscopic TAPP Hernioplasty
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 18 years of age and older * Both genders * Unilateral inguinal hernias * Incarcerated inguinal hernias * Elective setting
Exclusion criteria
* Anaesthesiologists) Grade \> 2 * Recurrence * Inguinal-scrotal hernias * Prostatectomy, Pfannenstiel incision, previous pre-peritoneal surgery * Pregnancy * Refusal for general anaesthesia
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of life scores as measured by Carolinas Comfort Scale | 12 months | Carolina Comfort Scale during the duration of follow-up |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Time in Minutes | 12 months | Comparing the duration of operation between open and laparoscopic surgeries. |
| Duration of Hospitalization in Days | 12 months | Comparing the duration of post operative stay between open and laparoscopic surgeries. |
| Recurrence of Hernia after Operation | 12 monthts | Comparing the recurrences between open and laparoscopic surgeries. |