Skip to content

Dose and Response of Intrathecal Hydromorphone in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section at Virginia Commonwealth University Health System

Dose and Response of Intrathecal Hydromorphone in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section at Virginia Commonwealth University Health System

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02787928
Enrollment
14
Registered
2016-06-01
Start date
2016-04-30
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2018-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cesarean Section, Obstetric Anesthesia

Brief summary

In the United States the incidence of cesarean deliveries have increased over the last several decades and is currently approximately 30% nationwide. The anesthesia and analgesia for elective c-sections vary between institutions. Parturients present a unique challenge for the anesthesiologist as the mother has to care not only for herself, but also for the newborn postpartum. While intrathecal opioids provide adequate pain relief, they do so at the cost of bothersome side effects for patients, such as pruritus and nausea/vomiting. Intrathecal hydromorphone has started to be explored as a new option for intrathecal analgesia. A study done by Beatty et al. showed in a retrospective review that 40 mcg of intrathecal dilaudid was safe and effective as compared to intrathecal morphine for analgesia after cesarean delivery. Additionally they showed no difference in side effect profiles of the two medications. Mhyre et al. investigated the use of 100 mcg of intrathecal dilaudid with hyperbaric bupivacaine in varying dosages for labor analgesia. The results were inconclusive, but the dosage of hydromorphone was reported to be without adverse effects. Virginia Commonwealth University Health Systems has successfully instituted the use of intrathecal morphine with superior analgesia but with undesired side effects, most notably pruritus. Recent drug shortages of duramorph have prompted investigators to seek alternative options for post cesarean section analgesia. The investigators are interested in determining the dose, efficacy, and side effect profile of intrathecal hydromorphone. Although our institution has never utilized intrathecal hydromorphone for our patient population, it has been studied at various other institutions where it has been found to be safe and efficacious with an acceptable side effect profile.

Interventions

Intrathecal hydromorphone will be administered in an up/down dosage fashion. A successful dose will be defined as a patient not requiring additional narcotic pain medication outside of the standard VCU order set, which includes PRN oxycodone 5 and 10 mg every 4 hours and a one time PRN 1 mg hydromorphone IV. Failure of a dose will be if patient requires additional narcotic pain medication outside of these parameters

Sponsors

Virginia Commonwealth University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification less than or equal to 3 Elective cesarean section Able to obtain a signed consent in English Patients who are 18 years or older

Exclusion criteria

* ASA greater than 3 or major medical comorbidities that are not optimized Patient refusal or contraindications to neuraxial/study drugs. Allergy to study drugs Conversion to general anesthesia Any patient who does not receive any multimodal regimen (PO acetaminophen, +/- PO ibuprofen/IV ketorolac) Any patient who is taking PO/IV opioids or buprenorphine during the current pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Narcotic Pain Medication12 hours post administration of intrathecal hydromorphoneDose failure defined as requiring more than oxycodone 5 or 10 mg q 4 hours and a 1x PRN of IV hydromorphone

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain4, 8, 12, 18 and 24 hours after placement of intrathecal hydromorphonePain score on numeric rating scale, 0 - 10 at above time points, total amount of narcotic pain medication required
Nausea4, 8, 12, 18 and 24 hours after placement of intrathecal hydromorphoneRated on Numerical rating scale 0 -10 and by amount of anti-emetic medication required (ondansetron)
Pruritus4, 8, 12, 18 and 24 hours after placement of intrathecal hydromorphoneRated on numerical rating scale 0 - 10, and by amount of anti-pruritic medication required (nalbuphine, benadryl)
Sedation4, 8, 12, 18 and 24 hours after placement of intrathecal hydromorphoneRichmond Agitation and Sedation Score at above time points
Infant Outcomeup to 10 minutesInfant APGAR scores at 1, 5 and 10 minutes post delivery

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026