Skip to content

Psychotherapy and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Depression

The Impact of Psychotherapy on Hemodynamic and Inflammatory Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Major Depression

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02787148
Enrollment
80
Registered
2016-06-01
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2019-10-31
Last updated
2021-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression

Keywords

cognitive behavioral therapy, psychotherapy, cardiovascular health, psychoneuroimmunology

Brief summary

Prospective studies indicate that patients with depression are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Depression is also associated with a number of hemodynamic features, which are known risk factors for cardiovascular morbidity such as increased heart rate, reduced heart rate variability and blood pressure alterations. These hemodynamic alterations may explain in part the increased cardiovascular risk associated with depression. The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment for depression with cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is effective in reducing hemodynamic cardiovascular risk factors. Hemodynamic assessments including heart rate, heart rate variability, continues blood pressure, blood pressure variability, baroreceptor sensitivity and peripheral vascular resistance will be conducted at baseline, after treatment and 2-month follow up. In addition, circadian hemodynamic variations such as 24-hour heart rate variability, nocturnal blood pressure dipping and immunological biomarkers will be assessed. Eighty patients with Major Depression will be randomly assigned to either a CBT treatment condition (14 hour-long, weekly sessions) or a waitlist condition, to control for potential changes in hemodynamic parameters without any intervention and the impact of repeated-measurement.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive behavioral therapy

Sponsors

Philipps University Marburg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with Major Depression (DSM IV), BDI \>=14 * age:18-65 years * patients without antidepressive medication (stable for at least 2 weeks) * comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders is permitted, as far as depressive symptoms are dominating

Exclusion criteria

* current psychotherapy * psychotic disorder * serious drug-addiction * drugs which seriously affect immune status (except contraceptives) or central * nervous system functions (except antidepressants) * infections during the last 2 weeks * injuries during the last 2 weeks * neurological disorders * diseases which affect immune status or central nervous system functions (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, CVD,etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in depressive symptoms (BDI-II)Change from baseline (beginning of therapy) to 3 month after baseline, to 2-month-follow up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in blood pressureChange from baseline (beginning of therapy) to 3 month after baseline, to 2-month-follow up
Change in baroreceptor sensitivity (ms/mmHg)Change from baseline (beginning of therapy) to 3 month after baseline, to 2-month-follow up
Change in peripheral vascular resistance (dyne*s/cm5)Change from baseline (beginning of therapy) to 3 month after baseline, to 2-month-follow up
Change in heart rate variabilityChange from baseline (beginning of therapy) to 3 month after baseline, to 2-month-follow up
Change in proinflammatory cytokinesChange from baseline (beginning of therapy) to 3 month after baseline, to 2-month-follow up
Change in anti-inflammatory interleukin-10Change from baseline (beginning of therapy) to 3 month after baseline, to 2-month-follow up
Change in Subjective social status (MacArthur scale)Change from baseline (beginning of therapy) to 3 month after baseline, to 2-month-follow up
Change in C-reactive proteinChange from baseline (beginning of therapy) to 3 month after baseline, to 2-month-follow up

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026