Skip to content

Exploring the Effects of Muse and Spire on Stress Management

Exploring the Effects of Muse and Spire on Stress Management

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02786771
Acronym
Stressless
Enrollment
126
Registered
2016-06-01
Start date
2016-07-31
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2020-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stress

Keywords

Stress Management, Mindfulness, Meditation, Stress Resilience

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Spire and Muse on stress management. The study will be implemented as a 2-arm randomized controlled pilot study to assess the effect of either device on stress management from the end of baseline to closeout.

Detailed description

Both Muse and Spire are recent technologies that could improve our understanding of stress management and enhance quality of healthcare. The goal of this study is to evaluate if Spire and Muse help individuals self-manage stress. Spire has been designed as a discrete clip-on tracker that monitors changes in respiration rate. With the companion app, this device displays breathing rates in real time and alerts the user through push notification in times of tension. Studies show that controlled breathing reduces stress. On the other hand, Muse is a headset device that uses EEG (electroencephalogram) sensors that measures electric brain frequencies. Muse guides the user in a form of simplified meditation by giving feedback in real time (i.e. calm, neutral, active) and audio clues to improve concentration. Previous studies have shown that engaging in meditation has the potential to reduce anxiety and stress.

Interventions

DEVICESpire

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Registered for Partners HealthCare Connected Health Symposium 2016 * Over 18 years old * Able to read and speak English * Own a smartphone and have internet connection * Willing to wear a Spire device during all hours (except sleep) * Willing to use the Muse device (Group 2 ONLY) * Willing to participate in a research study and sign the consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Not Registered for Partners HealthCare Connected Health Symposium 2016 * Under 18 years old * Not able to read and speak English * Do not own a smartphone and have internet connection * Not willing to wear a Spire device during all hours (except sleep) * Not willing to use the Muse device (Group 2 ONLY) * Not willing to sign the consent form

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Perceived Stress and Stress Resilience From Enrollment to Closeouttotal of 8 weeks (2 weeks of baseline + 6 weeks of intervention)The change of perceived stress and stress resilience within and between Group 1 and 2 from enrollment to closeout. The change of perceived stress is measured by the Perceived Stress Scale-14 (a validated psychological instrument of 14 items), each each rated on a 5 point scale(0-4) for measuring the respondent's perception of stress in the past month.The PSS-14 ranges from 0 to a high score of 56, with a higher score indicating more stress (worse outcome). The change of stress resilience is measured by the Connor-Davidson Stress Resilience Scale (25 items). It evaluates different aspects of stress coping ability that seeks to understand how well respondents would be able to buffer adverse conditions and cope with stress, each rated on a 5 point scale (0-4). The CD-RISC ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing better stress resilience (a better outcome).

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

In reference to comment \[2\] we had 126 participants that were enrolled in the study but only 125 that started the study. One participant that signed the consent form did not pass the eligibility criteria and therefore was not randomized into a study group and did not start the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Spire Device Without & With Feedback
Participants will receive a Spire device with user-feedback switched off within 4 days of enrollment in the study (shipped within 2 business days after they finish enrollment survey). Participants will be given 4 days, after enrollment, to set up their device before the 2 weeks of baseline. The 2 week baseline will start 4 days after enrollment. After two weeks of baseline with user-feedback off (and a 3 day transition period), participants will turn on the user-feedback for the Spire device which would provide a relaxation aid for the participant for the 6 remaining weeks. Spire
63
Muse Device & Spire Device no Feedback
Participants in this group will also receive Spire device to assess two weeks of baseline stress levels (with user-feedback off). Participants will be given 4 days, after enrollment, to set up their device before the 2 weeks of baseline. The 2 week baseline will start 4 days after enrollment. After these two weeks, participants will continue to use the Spire device with user feedback off for the remaining 6 weeks while they use the Muse device to manage stress through meditation. They will receive the Muse device 3 days before the end of baseline period with set up instructions and will utilize the three last days of baseline to set up their Muse device, Meditation will begin at the end of baseline (week three) and will continue for the remaining 6 weeks. Spire Muse headband
62
Total125

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMuse Device & Spire Device no FeedbackSpire Device Without & With FeedbackTotal
Age, Continuous37.46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.51
36.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.72
37.15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
Employment Status
Employed
52 Participants51 Participants103 Participants
Employment Status
Retired
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Employment Status
Student
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Employment Status
Unemployed
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Employment Status
Unknown
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
52 Participants49 Participants101 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
3 participants0 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
57 participants61 participants118 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants22 Participants44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants41 Participants81 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 630 / 62
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 630 / 62
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 630 / 62

Outcome results

Primary

Difference in Perceived Stress and Stress Resilience From Enrollment to Closeout

The change of perceived stress and stress resilience within and between Group 1 and 2 from enrollment to closeout. The change of perceived stress is measured by the Perceived Stress Scale-14 (a validated psychological instrument of 14 items), each each rated on a 5 point scale(0-4) for measuring the respondent's perception of stress in the past month.The PSS-14 ranges from 0 to a high score of 56, with a higher score indicating more stress (worse outcome). The change of stress resilience is measured by the Connor-Davidson Stress Resilience Scale (25 items). It evaluates different aspects of stress coping ability that seeks to understand how well respondents would be able to buffer adverse conditions and cope with stress, each rated on a 5 point scale (0-4). The CD-RISC ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing better stress resilience (a better outcome).

Time frame: total of 8 weeks (2 weeks of baseline + 6 weeks of intervention)

Population: Adults over 18 who responded to a online advertisement

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Spire Device Without & With FeedbackDifference in Perceived Stress and Stress Resilience From Enrollment to CloseoutPerceived Stress Scale at Enrollment23.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.83
Spire Device Without & With FeedbackDifference in Perceived Stress and Stress Resilience From Enrollment to CloseoutStress Resilience at Closeout69.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
Spire Device Without & With FeedbackDifference in Perceived Stress and Stress Resilience From Enrollment to CloseoutStress Resilience at Enrollment68.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.57
Spire Device Without & With FeedbackDifference in Perceived Stress and Stress Resilience From Enrollment to CloseoutPerceived Stress Scale at Closeout20.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.89
Muse Device & Spire Device no FeedbackDifference in Perceived Stress and Stress Resilience From Enrollment to CloseoutPerceived Stress Scale at Enrollment22.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.63
Muse Device & Spire Device no FeedbackDifference in Perceived Stress and Stress Resilience From Enrollment to CloseoutPerceived Stress Scale at Closeout19.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.92
Muse Device & Spire Device no FeedbackDifference in Perceived Stress and Stress Resilience From Enrollment to CloseoutStress Resilience at Enrollment70.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.39
Muse Device & Spire Device no FeedbackDifference in Perceived Stress and Stress Resilience From Enrollment to CloseoutStress Resilience at Closeout73.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.34

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026